Re: G201-IP
Posted by
jmkasunich
on 2002-11-25 07:02:22 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "mariss92705" <mariss92705@y...> wrote:
functions (throw a short across the output while it's connected
to the 100V supply)? Or would the protection circuit just be
tested during development and pilot runs? I mentioned UL before,
we are required to test the short circuit protection when we UL
test a pilot drive to get our UL rating, but are not required
to (and do not) short circuit test every drive we make. Short
circuit is stressfull, and we don't do it to a drive we intend to
ship. Life test drives, on the other hand, see 1000's of shorts
on their outputs.
John Kasunich
> I personally test each and every drive that goes out the door.If you build an IP version, would you 100% test the protective
>
> Once a drive passes the 24VDC, 2A test, a switch is thrown that
> changes everything. Now the test drive is hit with a 100VDC power
> supply while connected to a 7A PacSci NEMA 42 motor. Here one
> out of 50 surviving drives tested smokes. Sometimes bigtime.
> The 100VDC supply (a Sorensen 120VDC, 25A 19" rack-mount lab
> supply) literally kills the failures. The dead ones never ship.
>
functions (throw a short across the output while it's connected
to the 100V supply)? Or would the protection circuit just be
tested during development and pilot runs? I mentioned UL before,
we are required to test the short circuit protection when we UL
test a pilot drive to get our UL rating, but are not required
to (and do not) short circuit test every drive we make. Short
circuit is stressfull, and we don't do it to a drive we intend to
ship. Life test drives, on the other hand, see 1000's of shorts
on their outputs.
John Kasunich
Discussion Thread
mariss92705
2002-11-23 13:41:41 UTC
G201-IP
Jim Brown
2002-11-23 14:38:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP
Keith Bowers
2002-11-23 14:47:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP
mariss92705
2002-11-23 15:16:28 UTC
Re: G201-IP
Kory Hamzeh
2002-11-23 15:34:13 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP
James Cullins
2002-11-23 16:10:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP
turbulatordude
2002-11-23 16:39:34 UTC
Re: G201-IP
Ron Kline
2002-11-23 18:55:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP
Peter
2002-11-23 19:15:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP
kdoney_63021
2002-11-23 20:14:53 UTC
Re: G201-IP
Tony Jeffree
2002-11-23 22:02:41 UTC
Re: G201-IP
deanc500
2002-11-23 23:24:17 UTC
Re: G201-IP
galt1x
2002-11-24 03:25:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP
Thomas E. Jones
2002-11-24 10:00:20 UTC
Re: G201-IP
JanRwl@A...
2002-11-24 12:37:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP
JanRwl@A...
2002-11-24 12:46:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G201-IP
John Johnson
2002-11-24 13:50:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G201-IP
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2002-11-24 14:43:10 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G201-IP
turbulatordude
2002-11-24 20:01:56 UTC
Re: G201-IP
turbulatordude
2002-11-24 20:03:58 UTC
Re: G201-IP
turbulatordude
2002-11-24 20:06:17 UTC
Re: G201-IP
mariss92705
2002-11-24 22:51:31 UTC
Re: G201-IP
jmkasunich
2002-11-25 06:39:20 UTC
Re: G201-IP
jmkasunich
2002-11-25 07:02:22 UTC
Re: G201-IP
n4onl
2002-11-25 08:02:51 UTC
Re: G201-IP
pt_green
2002-11-25 21:58:41 UTC
Re: G201-IP
mayfieldtm
2002-11-26 12:58:24 UTC
Re: G201-IP
mariss92705
2002-11-26 17:46:31 UTC
Re: G201-IP
Marv Frankel
2002-11-26 18:21:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G201-IP
Jon Elson
2002-11-26 23:42:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G201-IP
Nicolas Benezan
2002-11-27 02:39:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP