Re: Holding thin sheet
Posted by
Tony Jeffree
on 2001-02-23 07:46:35 UTC
At 00:22 20/02/2001 +0000, you wrote:
1) If the thin sheet is heated appreciably by the machining operation, the
tape loses its adhesive properties (the glue melts).
2) You can get problems with thin sheet that has been rolled & not been
stress-relieved if the machining operation removes significant areas of the
surface skin - the sheet bends & the tape won't hold it. I have had this
problem with engraving operations on thin brass sheet (1/16" or so).
Hot-melt glue can be used also, but similar caveats apply.
The double-sided tape that is used for carpet-laying is pretty good - have
to watch how you remove the part after machining to avoid distortion. The
loss of "stick" with rising temperature can be used to advantage in
removing parts from the tape.
For machining brass/copper etc. sheet, it can be worth considering
attaching the sheet to a thicker mounting plate with soft solder if the
heating/distorting effects mentioned above are likely to be a problem.
Regards,
Tony
>You will be surprised what you can do with double sided tape.Two hazards to watch with this technique:
1) If the thin sheet is heated appreciably by the machining operation, the
tape loses its adhesive properties (the glue melts).
2) You can get problems with thin sheet that has been rolled & not been
stress-relieved if the machining operation removes significant areas of the
surface skin - the sheet bends & the tape won't hold it. I have had this
problem with engraving operations on thin brass sheet (1/16" or so).
Hot-melt glue can be used also, but similar caveats apply.
The double-sided tape that is used for carpet-laying is pretty good - have
to watch how you remove the part after machining to avoid distortion. The
loss of "stick" with rising temperature can be used to advantage in
removing parts from the tape.
For machining brass/copper etc. sheet, it can be worth considering
attaching the sheet to a thicker mounting plate with soft solder if the
heating/distorting effects mentioned above are likely to be a problem.
Regards,
Tony
Discussion Thread
Joe Vicars
2001-02-19 06:36:24 UTC
Holding thin sheet
Jon Anderson
2001-02-19 07:36:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Holding thin sheet
Joe Vicars
2001-02-19 09:15:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Holding thin sheet
Jon Anderson
2001-02-19 10:22:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Holding thin sheet
William Scalione
2001-02-19 10:46:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Holding thin sheet
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-02-19 10:51:02 UTC
Re: Holding thin sheet
indigo_red@q...
2001-02-19 11:37:38 UTC
Re: Holding thin sheet
Brian Pitt
2001-02-19 13:52:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Holding thin sheet
A. G. Eckstein
2001-02-19 14:37:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Holding thin sheet
Doug Harrison
2001-02-19 16:22:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Holding thin sheet
Hugh Currin
2001-02-19 16:51:53 UTC
Re: Holding thin sheet
tauseef
2001-02-19 17:32:36 UTC
Re: Holding thin sheet
Rich D.
2001-02-19 18:38:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Holding thin sheet
Rich D.
2001-02-19 18:39:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Holding thin sheet
Marcus & Eva
2001-02-19 20:07:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Holding thin sheet
Smoke
2001-02-19 20:55:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Holding thin sheet
ptengin@a...
2001-02-20 02:20:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Holding thin sheet
Dan Mauch
2001-02-20 07:14:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Holding thin sheet
dan.eaton@c...
2001-02-20 07:19:06 UTC
Re: Holding thin sheet
Joe Vicars
2001-02-20 07:31:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Holding thin sheet
ballendo@y...
2001-02-20 20:42:53 UTC
Re: Holding thin sheet
ballendo@y...
2001-02-20 21:00:04 UTC
Re: Holding thin sheet
Jon Anderson
2001-02-20 21:47:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Holding thin sheet
Joe Vicars
2001-02-21 08:54:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Holding thin sheet
Sven Peter, TAD S.A.
2001-02-22 15:10:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Holding thin sheet
Tony Jeffree
2001-02-23 07:46:35 UTC
Re: Holding thin sheet