CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: Re: Re: emc

Posted by Ray Henry
on 2002-07-17 12:40:06 UTC
Hoyt

I was surprised that you fiddled with EMC at all when you have put so
much effort into your own system. What was it you expected to get from
the EMC?

>    From: bjammin@...
> Subject: Re: Re: emc
<s>
> There can never be any real and lasting consistency in open source
> code, unless you have a deity to manage the individual programmers.

What! You telling me that Torvalds isn't a Norse god.

Tom Yager wrote an interesting comment in InfoWorld July 15 02 in a
sidebar to an article titled, "Intel touts RISC alternative."

"There are two wild cards in this game: Linux and AMD. Intel wisely
courted Linux as an early software partner. Whereas Windows ISVs balk at
reworking their 32-bit code for Itanium, most Linux applications need
little tuning to run on the new hardware. Linux is already established
on 64-bit platforms, and developers have long avoided the pitfalls that
cause ported applications to break. The respectability of a commercial
Unix, coupled with Linux's vast software library and brilliant developer
community, gives Itanium 2 a strong software presence out of the gate."

I guess one advantage of the EMC is the fact that it has been ported to a
number of machines and is available for anyone to modify by porting to
new machines as they come along.

Ray

Discussion Thread

batwings@x... 1999-10-10 21:39:43 UTC emc TheDragonPit 1999-10-11 08:03:15 UTC Re: emc Terry L. Ridder 1999-10-11 08:15:31 UTC Re: emc Steve Carlisle 1999-10-11 09:47:45 UTC Re: emc Darrell Gehlsen 1999-10-11 09:54:32 UTC Re: emc Carlos Guillermo 1999-10-11 11:26:20 UTC RE: emc Carlos Guillermo 1999-10-11 11:39:59 UTC RE: emc Carlos Guillermo 1999-10-11 11:44:23 UTC RE: emc Paul Corner 1999-10-11 12:39:37 UTC Re: emc Terry L. Ridder 1999-10-11 12:41:40 UTC Re: emc Terry L. Ridder 1999-10-11 13:05:07 UTC RE: emc Steve Carlisle 1999-10-11 14:27:59 UTC Re: emc Steve Carlisle 1999-10-11 14:30:47 UTC Re: emc Jon Elson 1999-10-11 13:48:46 UTC Re: emc Matt Shaver 1999-10-11 15:57:50 UTC Re: emc Ian Wright 1999-10-11 12:29:06 UTC Re: emc Carlos Guillermo 1999-10-12 04:19:28 UTC RE: emc batwings@x... 1999-10-11 20:53:46 UTC Re: emc batwings@x... 1999-10-11 10:04:00 UTC Re: emc Darrell Gehlsen 1999-10-12 10:15:37 UTC Re: emc Roger Brower 1999-10-13 13:51:58 UTC emc Les Watts 2002-07-17 06:24:11 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: emc Ian W. Wright 2002-07-17 06:56:24 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc bjammin@i... 2002-07-17 08:02:23 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: emc bjammin@i... 2002-07-17 08:03:41 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc William Scalione 2002-07-17 09:20:11 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc Keith Bowers 2002-07-17 11:16:04 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc Ray Henry 2002-07-17 12:40:06 UTC Re: Re: Re: emc Keith Rumley 2002-07-17 14:30:42 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc dakota8833 2002-07-17 15:05:13 UTC Re: emc Marshall Pharoah 2002-07-17 19:30:31 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc Carol & Jerry Jankura 2002-07-17 20:17:09 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc Les Newell 2002-07-17 23:59:54 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc Ray Henry 2002-07-18 06:46:26 UTC Re: Re: emc Joll503@A... 2002-07-19 02:20:58 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: emc Jon Elson 2002-07-19 09:11:58 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: emc bjammin@i... 2002-07-22 06:59:02 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc bjammin@i... 2002-07-25 06:59:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: emc bjammin@i... 2002-07-25 06:59:09 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: emc edward c heil 2003-06-11 16:21:50 UTC emc Jon Elson 2003-06-11 21:40:21 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc