Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: water jet
Posted by
Bob McKnight
on 2004-10-18 17:55:20 UTC
Basically, Liquids are considereed incompressable. There is some
change in volume with temperature change, but to get a significant
change in volume, you have to have a change of state. If my memory
serves me correctly, when water changes to vapor, it expands about
a thousand times. When water changes to a solid, it expands enough
to float. It seems that under extreme pressure, it will shrink a very
small amount. Not enough that a two stage pump would be required.
bob mcknight
Im not sure what you mean by "clipping" the message. Explain and I
will do it. I havent seen any flowrates for the jet calculated which
would give a rough idea of the cut duration. I'm thinking it would be
less than a minute. A one minute cut cycle would be hardly enough
time
to do anything. Imagine trying to cut a large radius and having
program interupts . The programming would be unorthodox to say the
least. Another thing that would have to be taken into consideration is
the volume of the cylinder. When the water is compressed within and
reaches a pressure suitable to perform a task I would think the volume
would be considerable less. A portion of the stroke and internal
volume would be lost compressing the water. Seems the need for a
multistage series of cylinders would be required to over come this.
Starting with a large cylinder then tranferring to a smaller diameter
cylinder progressively until the desired pressure is attained. Now I'm
talking about a pump.
Hey, why doesnt someone just do that? Design and build a multi-stage
pump. Use a block of stainless and incorporate shelf items common
with
pressure sprayers, ceramic pistons etc. Have the intake fed with a
pressure sprayer pump, getting a 1500 psi gain right from the start.
Could be 4 single acting cylinders machined from one block and leave
it massive, with one way checks in between. Crankshaft and
connecting rods could be replaced by linear bearing supported
plungers
attached to ceramic pistons and a camshaft to actuate 0-180-0-180. A
stroke of 1" or less would be sufficient. The last cylinder could
probably be as small is 1/2" in diameter. Still need a bunch of
horsepower.
This would be alot smoother operating than trying to attain all the
pressure in one stroke. This might be the principle already in use for
waterjets. This might even reduce the required horsepower.
Ron
raig <docsys@...> wrote:
A better alternative to your design would be: Two water cylinders in
parallel that work in opposite of one another to supply a constant
flow to the jet and switched/valved at the nozzle.
This then becomes way too complicated, it needs to be simple to
reduce
the cost. Think real simple terms here, like a super-soaker water play
toy gun. You have a set pressure for s set time limit.
energy?
Bruce
PS:
Could you clip your message next time?
Addresses:
FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com,
wanliker@...,
timg@... Moderator: pentam@...
indigo_red@... davemucha@... [Moderators] URL to this
group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach
it if you have trouble. http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be
a
sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are
there,
for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC
DOMAIN BY POSTING
THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO
EXCEPTIONS........
bill List Mom List Owner
Yahoo! Groups Links
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Express yourself with Y! Messenger! Free. Download now.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Addresses:
FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com,
wanliker@...,
timg@... Moderator: pentam@...
indigo_red@... davemucha@... [Moderators] URL to
this
group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach
it if you have trouble. http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be
a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are
there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC
DOMAIN BY POSTING
THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO
EXCEPTIONS........
bill List Mom List Owner
Yahoo! Groups Links
change in volume with temperature change, but to get a significant
change in volume, you have to have a change of state. If my memory
serves me correctly, when water changes to vapor, it expands about
a thousand times. When water changes to a solid, it expands enough
to float. It seems that under extreme pressure, it will shrink a very
small amount. Not enough that a two stage pump would be required.
bob mcknight
Im not sure what you mean by "clipping" the message. Explain and I
will do it. I havent seen any flowrates for the jet calculated which
would give a rough idea of the cut duration. I'm thinking it would be
less than a minute. A one minute cut cycle would be hardly enough
time
to do anything. Imagine trying to cut a large radius and having
program interupts . The programming would be unorthodox to say the
least. Another thing that would have to be taken into consideration is
the volume of the cylinder. When the water is compressed within and
reaches a pressure suitable to perform a task I would think the volume
would be considerable less. A portion of the stroke and internal
volume would be lost compressing the water. Seems the need for a
multistage series of cylinders would be required to over come this.
Starting with a large cylinder then tranferring to a smaller diameter
cylinder progressively until the desired pressure is attained. Now I'm
talking about a pump.
Hey, why doesnt someone just do that? Design and build a multi-stage
pump. Use a block of stainless and incorporate shelf items common
with
pressure sprayers, ceramic pistons etc. Have the intake fed with a
pressure sprayer pump, getting a 1500 psi gain right from the start.
Could be 4 single acting cylinders machined from one block and leave
it massive, with one way checks in between. Crankshaft and
connecting rods could be replaced by linear bearing supported
plungers
attached to ceramic pistons and a camshaft to actuate 0-180-0-180. A
stroke of 1" or less would be sufficient. The last cylinder could
probably be as small is 1/2" in diameter. Still need a bunch of
horsepower.
This would be alot smoother operating than trying to attain all the
pressure in one stroke. This might be the principle already in use for
waterjets. This might even reduce the required horsepower.
Ron
raig <docsys@...> wrote:
A better alternative to your design would be: Two water cylinders in
parallel that work in opposite of one another to supply a constant
flow to the jet and switched/valved at the nozzle.
This then becomes way too complicated, it needs to be simple to
reduce
the cost. Think real simple terms here, like a super-soaker water play
toy gun. You have a set pressure for s set time limit.
>large
>
>Developing and storing dangerous levels of pressure/energy in a
>vessel was largely the death of the steam engine on a widescale.Doesn't the internal combustion engine develop dangerous levels of
>Expensive, Inefficient and unsafe.
>
>
energy?
Bruce
PS:
Could you clip your message next time?
Addresses:
FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com,
wanliker@...,
timg@... Moderator: pentam@...
indigo_red@... davemucha@... [Moderators] URL to this
group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach
it if you have trouble. http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be
a
sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are
there,
for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC
DOMAIN BY POSTING
THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO
EXCEPTIONS........
bill List Mom List Owner
Yahoo! Groups Links
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Express yourself with Y! Messenger! Free. Download now.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Addresses:
FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com,
wanliker@...,
timg@... Moderator: pentam@...
indigo_red@... davemucha@... [Moderators] URL to
this
group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach
it if you have trouble. http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be
a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are
there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC
DOMAIN BY POSTING
THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO
EXCEPTIONS........
bill List Mom List Owner
Yahoo! Groups Links
Discussion Thread
Bill Robertson
2004-09-26 21:47:18 UTC
Air blower?
josef wagner
2004-09-26 23:02:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Air blower?
R Rogers
2004-09-26 23:03:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Air blower?
Tony Jeffree
2004-09-26 23:28:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Air blower?
Bill Robertson
2004-09-27 06:26:33 UTC
Re: Air blower?
turbulatordude
2004-09-27 06:37:48 UTC
Re: Air blower?
R Rogers
2004-09-27 06:56:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Air blower?
R Rogers
2004-09-27 06:59:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Air blower?
Bill Robertson
2004-09-27 07:05:25 UTC
Re: Air blower?
R Rogers
2004-09-27 07:30:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Air blower?
Jon Elson
2004-09-27 17:16:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Air blower?
alex
2004-10-17 14:44:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: water jet
Bruce Craig
2004-10-17 17:40:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: water jet
R Rogers
2004-10-17 17:49:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: water jet
alex
2004-10-18 07:30:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: water jet
alex
2004-10-18 07:38:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: water jet
turbulatordude
2004-10-18 09:06:04 UTC
Re: water jet
alex
2004-10-18 09:26:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: water jet
Bruce Craig
2004-10-18 09:28:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: water jet
R Rogers
2004-10-18 09:51:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: water jet
John Cox
2004-10-18 10:16:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: water jet
alex
2004-10-18 10:21:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: water jet
caudlet
2004-10-18 10:33:07 UTC
Re: water jet
ftomazz
2004-10-18 10:56:55 UTC
Re: water jet
R Rogers
2004-10-18 11:52:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: water jet
Bruce Craig
2004-10-18 14:38:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: water jet
R Rogers
2004-10-18 15:44:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: water jet
R Rogers
2004-10-18 16:27:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: water jet
Bruce Craig
2004-10-18 16:44:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: water jet
Bob McKnight
2004-10-18 17:55:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: water jet
R Rogers
2004-10-18 18:02:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: water jet
Jon Elson
2004-10-18 18:38:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: water jet
metlmunchr
2004-10-18 19:13:51 UTC
Re: water jet
josef wagner
2004-10-19 01:36:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: water jet
alex
2004-10-19 07:04:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: water jet
turbulatordude
2004-10-19 09:08:16 UTC
Re: water jet
josef wagner
2004-10-19 09:08:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: water jet
alex
2004-10-19 09:16:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: water jet
R Rogers
2004-10-19 10:28:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: water jet
Mark Stacey
2004-10-19 14:21:12 UTC
Re: water jet
alex
2004-10-19 14:42:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: water jet
R Rogers
2004-10-19 16:22:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: water jet