Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: water jet

A better alternative to your design would be: Two water cylinders in
parallel that work in opposite of one another to supply a constant flow
to the jet and switched/valved at the nozzle.

This then becomes way too complicated, it needs to be simple to reduce
the cost. Think real simple terms here, like a super-soaker water play
toy gun. You have
a set pressure for s set time limit.

>
>
>Developing and storing dangerous levels of pressure/energy in a large vessel was largely the death of the steam engine on a widescale. Expensive, Inefficient and unsafe.
>
>

Doesn't the internal combustion engine develop dangerous levels of energy?

Bruce

PS:
Could you clip your message next time?