Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2005-11-04 10:01:35 UTC
jacoby01 wrote:
similar,
then go for the big one. The X travel on the series I BOSS machines is
quite
a bit shorter than on the manual machines, about 18". If either machine has
badly worn ways, I would advise against that one. You have to consider the
work you are likely to do, though. You may never plan to work on pieces
bigger than a 6" cube, so maybe the smaller is just a better fit to your
work. if you plan to make large panels, then maybe the larger is very much
in order. Also, the Series II has a much beefier spindle and more powerful
motor (except that some Series-II bases with multiple spindles use Series-I
heads. So, check if the head is a 2J or 3J.)
"retrofit-
ability." Many people don't have the floor space, or the ceiling
height, or the
lifting capacity for the Series-II. I think that's the main reason the
Series-I is
more popular for the home shop. I wish *I* had the headroom for a
Series-II,
myself.
Jon
>I'm looking at both a Bridgeport Series I and a Series II 3-axis CNCIf you have the room, and the condition of the ways and ballscrews are
>machines as candidates for refitting with most probably Mach2 software
>and Gecko servo drivers.
>
>The Series I machine looks very similar to those that Roland Friestad
>has featured in the Home Shop Machinist series - except the electronic
>display is enclosed in a fiberglass housing and mounted on the front of
>the head.
>
>The Series II machine, again it is already a 3-axis CNC machine -
>original from the factory, but with "roached" electronics - looks like
>a normal Series II, but with one major exception - it has dual heads
>and the heads are mounted on a vertical T-slot table. This particular
>machine looks like it was set up for production, before the days of
>automatic tool changers (the machine is approximately 1980 vintage).
>I've got a picture of this machine, but can't figure out how to post it.
>
>Now the question: Any thoughts on which of these two machines is a
>better candidate for conversion? The Series II is actually cheaper and
>looks to be more machine for the money. But, I'm afraid that I don't
>know enough about converting Bridgeports and I don't want to later find
>out that, "Nobody refits the Series II machines because ...!"
>
>
similar,
then go for the big one. The X travel on the series I BOSS machines is
quite
a bit shorter than on the manual machines, about 18". If either machine has
badly worn ways, I would advise against that one. You have to consider the
work you are likely to do, though. You may never plan to work on pieces
bigger than a 6" cube, so maybe the smaller is just a better fit to your
work. if you plan to make large panels, then maybe the larger is very much
in order. Also, the Series II has a much beefier spindle and more powerful
motor (except that some Series-II bases with multiple spindles use Series-I
heads. So, check if the head is a 2J or 3J.)
>There is no reason one would choose one over the other related to the
>
"retrofit-
ability." Many people don't have the floor space, or the ceiling
height, or the
lifting capacity for the Series-II. I think that's the main reason the
Series-I is
more popular for the home shop. I wish *I* had the headroom for a
Series-II,
myself.
Jon
Discussion Thread
jacoby01
2005-11-04 04:00:26 UTC
Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
turbulatordude
2005-11-04 04:47:05 UTC
Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
jacoby01
2005-11-04 05:03:06 UTC
Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates - Picture
turbulatordude
2005-11-04 05:21:12 UTC
Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates - Picture
Les Newell
2005-11-04 05:59:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
turbulatordude
2005-11-04 07:15:57 UTC
Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Les Newell
2005-11-04 07:44:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
R Rogers
2005-11-04 08:17:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Craig Stevens
2005-11-04 09:15:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Jon Elson
2005-11-04 10:01:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Jon Elson
2005-11-04 10:05:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates - Picture
Jon Elson
2005-11-04 10:07:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
R Rogers
2005-11-04 11:05:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
turbulatordude
2005-11-04 14:34:00 UTC
Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Jeff Goldberg
2005-11-04 14:44:50 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
R Rogers
2005-11-04 16:13:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Polaraligned
2005-11-04 17:14:45 UTC
Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Les Newell
2005-11-04 17:50:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
R Rogers
2005-11-04 17:52:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Peter Reilley
2005-11-04 17:55:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Les Newell
2005-11-04 18:13:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
caedave
2005-11-05 01:59:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
JCullins
2005-11-05 05:37:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
vavaroutsos
2005-11-05 09:28:18 UTC
Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Jon Elson
2005-11-05 09:58:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Jon Elson
2005-11-05 10:05:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Jon Elson
2005-11-05 10:07:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Jon Elson
2005-11-05 10:10:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Jon Elson
2005-11-05 10:13:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Les Newell
2005-11-05 13:48:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
ddfalck2002
2005-11-05 14:17:14 UTC
Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
caedave
2005-11-05 15:51:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Polaraligned
2005-11-05 16:58:19 UTC
Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Mike Delany
2005-11-05 19:32:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Jon Elson
2005-11-05 20:08:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Les Newell
2005-11-06 03:00:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Steve Haushahn
2005-11-06 08:34:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Les Newell
2005-11-06 12:13:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
deepcavity@h...
2005-11-06 18:11:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Stephen Wille Padnos
2005-11-06 18:54:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
vavaroutsos
2005-11-06 19:28:20 UTC
Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
vavaroutsos
2005-11-06 19:38:55 UTC
Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates