Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2005-11-05 09:58:07 UTC
R Rogers wrote:
the only interchangable
parts might be the hand cranks. I have a book with the dimensions of
the Ser-I and
Ser-I, and it is quite clear the Ser-II is a much bigger frame,
overall. Note that standard
Y travel on the Ser-I is 12", on the Ser-II it is 15". So, obviously,
the knee is much
larger. The weight is vastly greater on Ser-II, about 4750 Lbs. The
table surface is
58 x 11", and it stands 92 3/4" tall. The head listed in that book is
the 4J.
from the
manual Ser-II. That is the same on the Series-I BOSS vs. manual
machine, too.
There are 3 table lengths available on the manual Ser-I, 36, 42 (most
common) and 48".
These machines run around 2100 Lbs.
Jon
>Bridgeport called those "duplicating mills". Typical gang configuration.No, this is wrong. The Series-II is a totally different machine, and
>
>I'm a little confused on the Series 1 or 2 issue. I've ran and repaired both over the years, seen them sitting side by side and the only difference was the Series2 has a 48" table instead of 42" and the motor is 3hp instead of 2 or 1-1/2 hp. All other parts,castings,etc are identical.
>
the only interchangable
parts might be the hand cranks. I have a book with the dimensions of
the Ser-I and
Ser-I, and it is quite clear the Ser-II is a much bigger frame,
overall. Note that standard
Y travel on the Ser-I is 12", on the Ser-II it is 15". So, obviously,
the knee is much
larger. The weight is vastly greater on Ser-II, about 4750 Lbs. The
table surface is
58 x 11", and it stands 92 3/4" tall. The head listed in that book is
the 4J.
> There must be two different mills that are referred to as a "Series 2". Or alot of different variants of it. All the CNC's were either Boss or Interact's. Pre-Series machines we always referred to as "J-heads".There are variations. The BOSS Ser-II has a different saddle and table
>
>
from the
manual Ser-II. That is the same on the Series-I BOSS vs. manual
machine, too.
There are 3 table lengths available on the manual Ser-I, 36, 42 (most
common) and 48".
These machines run around 2100 Lbs.
Jon
Discussion Thread
jacoby01
2005-11-04 04:00:26 UTC
Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
turbulatordude
2005-11-04 04:47:05 UTC
Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
jacoby01
2005-11-04 05:03:06 UTC
Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates - Picture
turbulatordude
2005-11-04 05:21:12 UTC
Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates - Picture
Les Newell
2005-11-04 05:59:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
turbulatordude
2005-11-04 07:15:57 UTC
Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Les Newell
2005-11-04 07:44:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
R Rogers
2005-11-04 08:17:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Craig Stevens
2005-11-04 09:15:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Jon Elson
2005-11-04 10:01:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Jon Elson
2005-11-04 10:05:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates - Picture
Jon Elson
2005-11-04 10:07:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
R Rogers
2005-11-04 11:05:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
turbulatordude
2005-11-04 14:34:00 UTC
Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Jeff Goldberg
2005-11-04 14:44:50 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
R Rogers
2005-11-04 16:13:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Polaraligned
2005-11-04 17:14:45 UTC
Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Les Newell
2005-11-04 17:50:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
R Rogers
2005-11-04 17:52:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Peter Reilley
2005-11-04 17:55:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Les Newell
2005-11-04 18:13:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
caedave
2005-11-05 01:59:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
JCullins
2005-11-05 05:37:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
vavaroutsos
2005-11-05 09:28:18 UTC
Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Jon Elson
2005-11-05 09:58:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Jon Elson
2005-11-05 10:05:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Jon Elson
2005-11-05 10:07:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Jon Elson
2005-11-05 10:10:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Jon Elson
2005-11-05 10:13:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Les Newell
2005-11-05 13:48:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
ddfalck2002
2005-11-05 14:17:14 UTC
Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
caedave
2005-11-05 15:51:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Polaraligned
2005-11-05 16:58:19 UTC
Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Mike Delany
2005-11-05 19:32:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Jon Elson
2005-11-05 20:08:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Les Newell
2005-11-06 03:00:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Steve Haushahn
2005-11-06 08:34:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Les Newell
2005-11-06 12:13:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
deepcavity@h...
2005-11-06 18:11:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
Stephen Wille Padnos
2005-11-06 18:54:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
vavaroutsos
2005-11-06 19:28:20 UTC
Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates
vavaroutsos
2005-11-06 19:38:55 UTC
Re: Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates