Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport Series I verse Series II CNC Refit Candidates

Bridgeport called those "duplicating mills". Typical gang configuration.

I'm a little confused on the Series 1 or 2 issue. I've ran and repaired both over the years, seen them sitting side by side and the only difference was the Series2 has a 48" table instead of 42" and the motor is 3hp instead of 2 or 1-1/2 hp. All other parts,castings,etc are identical. There must be two different mills that are referred to as a "Series 2". Or alot of different variants of it. All the CNC's were either Boss or Interact's. Pre-Series machines we always referred to as "J-heads".

Ron
Jon Elson <elson@...> wrote:
jacoby01 wrote:

>I'm looking at both a Bridgeport Series I and a Series II 3-axis CNC
>machines as candidates for refitting with most probably Mach2 software
>and Gecko servo drivers.
>
>The Series I machine looks very similar to those that Roland Friestad
>has featured in the Home Shop Machinist series - except the electronic
>display is enclosed in a fiberglass housing and mounted on the front of
>the head.
>
>The Series II machine, again it is already a 3-axis CNC machine -
>original from the factory, but with "roached" electronics - looks like
>a normal Series II, but with one major exception - it has dual heads
>and the heads are mounted on a vertical T-slot table. This particular
>machine looks like it was set up for production, before the days of
>automatic tool changers (the machine is approximately 1980 vintage).
>I've got a picture of this machine, but can't figure out how to post it.
>
>Now the question: Any thoughts on which of these two machines is a
>better candidate for conversion? The Series II is actually cheaper and
>looks to be more machine for the money. But, I'm afraid that I don't
>know enough about converting Bridgeports and I don't want to later find
>out that, "Nobody refits the Series II machines because ...!"
>
>

If you have the room, and the condition of the ways and ballscrews are
similar,
then go for the big one. The X travel on the series I BOSS machines is
quite
a bit shorter than on the manual machines, about 18". If either machine has
badly worn ways, I would advise against that one. You have to consider the
work you are likely to do, though. You may never plan to work on pieces
bigger than a 6" cube, so maybe the smaller is just a better fit to your
work. if you plan to make large panels, then maybe the larger is very much
in order. Also, the Series II has a much beefier spindle and more powerful
motor (except that some Series-II bases with multiple spindles use Series-I
heads. So, check if the head is a 2J or 3J.)

>
>

There is no reason one would choose one over the other related to the
"retrofit-
ability." Many people don't have the floor space, or the ceiling
height, or the
lifting capacity for the Series-II. I think that's the main reason the
Series-I is
more popular for the home shop. I wish *I* had the headroom for a
Series-II,
myself.

Jon



Addresses:
FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com

Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@..., timg@...
Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... davemucha@... [Moderators]
URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO

OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto: aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if you have trouble.
http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.

NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
bill
List Mom
List Owner


Yahoo! Groups Links








[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]