Irrelevant Gcode?!? wasRe: Interface. Gauging interest.

Phil,

You're off the mark on this one IMO.

Those "irrelevant" items you mention are QUITE relevant in today's
modern machine shop. Even one with 50 thousand buck CADCAM...

AND, also in a one man shop with cheap or NO cadcam. In fact
those "irrelevant things like alternate COsys's are what allow that
one man shop to compete with the big guys...

Grab Peter Smid's book on Gcode programming, and anything by Mike
Lynch. CNCconcepts.com

Ballendo


--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Phil Mattison"
<mattison20@...> wrote:

>
> Hi Chris,
>
> I think I said I didn't expect it change any time soon. I said the

RS274NGC

> spec is a piece of crap. It is obviously from a time when most CNC

code was

> written by hand, like the days when my dad wrote financial

programs in

> assembly language. It is full of constructs supporting things that

are

> largely irrelevant now, like alternate coordinate systems for array
> machining, automatic tool radius compensation, etc. G-Code as a

convention

> (i.e. G0 G1, etc.) is as good as any equivalent, but the

collection of

> capabilities is mostly obsolete because most of what was created

to simplify

> manual G-Code writing is no longer necessary with all the

automatic code

> generators already available. Whoever produces the desired results

in the

> cheapest, easiest manner will ultimately win, tradition

notwithstanding.

> --
> Phil Mattison
> http://www.ohmikron.com/
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: lcdpublishing <lcdpublishing@...>
> To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 5:31 AM
> Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
>
>
> > Hi Phil,
> >
> > Not sure what you are basing this opinion on, but, don't expect

RS274

> > (or simply put, G-Code programming) to go away. The most complex
> > shapes that are machined today are done with G-codes on ordinary

CNC

> > machines all over the world.
> >
> > The G-Code method of programming has been around since the

beginning

> > of CNC, and will remain there, probably forever. There really

isn't

> > anything lacking with it, nor is there anything that can't be

machined

> > with it.
> >
> > There have been a number of attempts over the years to "change

the

> > world", most have failed, some have done okay. For example, at

one

> > point in time, it was thought that programming on the shop floor

was

> > the best way to get things done. During that phase, control

mfgs. came

> > out with various "Conversational" controls which were somewhat

of a

> > CAM system on top of the basic G-Code interpreting control.
> >
> > While this method of programming is still around and still

applicable

> > in short-run shops, production shops frown on it as being very
> > inefficient. I mean really, you have a $150,000.00+ machine tool
> > being used as a $5,000.00 CAM system.
> >
> > As to the various flavors of G-Code programming, there have been

many

> > attempts to change and it seems as though every control mfg puts

their

> > own little spin on it. But it's still the basic G-Code and

cartesian

> > coordinate system that gets the work done on machine tools.
> >
> > So, while you may think it is "Crap", the leaders in the machine

tool

> > industry put their money on G-Code programming as THE method of
> > programming CNC machines.
> >
> > Don't expect it to change anytime soon.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > After a careful reading of the various flavors of RS274 it

looks to

> > me like
> > > RS274NGC is pretty much an outdated piece of crap when it

comes to

> > machine
> > > control, surviving only by virtue of familiarity and inertia.

Not

> > that I
> > > think it is going away any time soon, but it certainly doesn't

look

> > like
> > > golden handcuffs if you're interested in the general motion-

control

> > market.
> > > I suspect it may not really have much of a strangle-hold on the
> > hobby CNC
> > > market either, since that will have many new-comers if it is

in fact

> > growing
> > > rapidly.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Addresses:
> > FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> > FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> > Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com,

wanliker@...,

> timg@...
> > Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... davemucha@...
> [Moderators]
> > URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> >
> > OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> > If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
> aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to

reach it if

> you have trouble.
> > http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this

to be a

> sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are

there, for OT

> subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
> >
> > NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY

POSTING THEM.

> DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> > bill
> > List Mom
> > List Owner
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>