Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Posted by
lcdpublishing
on 2006-05-17 09:22:57 UTC
Uh oh, Phil you are treading in very DEEP waters :-)
If you don't think tool radius compensation is needed (especially on
a mill), you apparently never ran a machine which make precision
parts. TRC and TNRC are both very useful functions in precision
machining regardless of CAM side programming, Conversational, or
straight G-Code programming.
Even canned cycles for drilling are still very functional and
useful. Many steels for instance, such as the 10 series, can
exhibit varying degrees of machinability. With a canned cycle for
peck drilling, it only takes a couple seconds to adjust for the
problems with stingy chips. If you have to go back to the CAM
software to make the changes in all the individual moves, it would
certainly take much more time. Make changes, re-post program,
transfer to DNC system, download program versus, change one address
in the program and run the next part.
Fixture offsets are a wonderful feature, even with CAM systems.
Remember, CNC controls do not have an infinite amount of memory.
So, without using fixture offsets and sub-programs, many programs
would simply be too big to fit in the control's memory. Many of the
PC based controls have fairly large memories, but it is still not
infinite.
Chris
-- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Phil Mattison"
<mattison20@...> wrote:
If you don't think tool radius compensation is needed (especially on
a mill), you apparently never ran a machine which make precision
parts. TRC and TNRC are both very useful functions in precision
machining regardless of CAM side programming, Conversational, or
straight G-Code programming.
Even canned cycles for drilling are still very functional and
useful. Many steels for instance, such as the 10 series, can
exhibit varying degrees of machinability. With a canned cycle for
peck drilling, it only takes a couple seconds to adjust for the
problems with stingy chips. If you have to go back to the CAM
software to make the changes in all the individual moves, it would
certainly take much more time. Make changes, re-post program,
transfer to DNC system, download program versus, change one address
in the program and run the next part.
Fixture offsets are a wonderful feature, even with CAM systems.
Remember, CNC controls do not have an infinite amount of memory.
So, without using fixture offsets and sub-programs, many programs
would simply be too big to fit in the control's memory. Many of the
PC based controls have fairly large memories, but it is still not
infinite.
Chris
-- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Phil Mattison"
<mattison20@...> wrote:
>RS274NGC
> Hi Chris,
>
> I think I said I didn't expect it change any time soon. I said the
> spec is a piece of crap. It is obviously from a time when most CNCcode was
> written by hand, like the days when my dad wrote financialprograms in
> assembly language. It is full of constructs supporting things thatare
> largely irrelevant now, like alternate coordinate systems for arrayconvention
> machining, automatic tool radius compensation, etc. G-Code as a
> (i.e. G0 G1, etc.) is as good as any equivalent, but thecollection of
> capabilities is mostly obsolete because most of what was createdto simplify
> manual G-Code writing is no longer necessary with all theautomatic code
> generators already available. Whoever produces the desired resultsin the
> cheapest, easiest manner will ultimately win, traditionnotwithstanding.
> --RS274
> Phil Mattison
> http://www.ohmikron.com/
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: lcdpublishing <lcdpublishing@...>
> To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 5:31 AM
> Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
>
>
> > Hi Phil,
> >
> > Not sure what you are basing this opinion on, but, don't expect
> > (or simply put, G-Code programming) to go away. The most complexCNC
> > shapes that are machined today are done with G-codes on ordinary
> > machines all over the world.beginning
> >
> > The G-Code method of programming has been around since the
> > of CNC, and will remain there, probably forever. There reallyisn't
> > anything lacking with it, nor is there anything that can't bemachined
> > with it.the
> >
> > There have been a number of attempts over the years to "change
> > world", most have failed, some have done okay. For example, atone
> > point in time, it was thought that programming on the shop floorwas
> > the best way to get things done. During that phase, controlmfgs. came
> > out with various "Conversational" controls which were somewhatof a
> > CAM system on top of the basic G-Code interpreting control.applicable
> >
> > While this method of programming is still around and still
> > in short-run shops, production shops frown on it as being verymany
> > inefficient. I mean really, you have a $150,000.00+ machine tool
> > being used as a $5,000.00 CAM system.
> >
> > As to the various flavors of G-Code programming, there have been
> > attempts to change and it seems as though every control mfg putstheir
> > own little spin on it. But it's still the basic G-Code andcartesian
> > coordinate system that gets the work done on machine tools.tool
> >
> > So, while you may think it is "Crap", the leaders in the machine
> > industry put their money on G-Code programming as THE method oflooks to
> > programming CNC machines.
> >
> > Don't expect it to change anytime soon.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > After a careful reading of the various flavors of RS274 it
> > me likecomes to
> > > RS274NGC is pretty much an outdated piece of crap when it
> > machineNot
> > > control, surviving only by virtue of familiarity and inertia.
> > that Ilook
> > > think it is going away any time soon, but it certainly doesn't
> > likecontrol
> > > golden handcuffs if you're interested in the general motion-
> > market.in fact
> > > I suspect it may not really have much of a strangle-hold on the
> > hobby CNC
> > > market either, since that will have many new-comers if it is
> > growingwanliker@...,
> > > rapidly.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Addresses:
> > FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> > FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> > Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com,
> timg@...reach it if
> > Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... davemucha@...
> [Moderators]
> > URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> >
> > OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> > If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
> aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to
> you have trouble.to be a
> > http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this
> sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members arethere, for OT
> subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.POSTING THEM.
> >
> > NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY
> DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> > bill
> > List Mom
> > List Owner
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Discussion Thread
Dennis Schmitz
2006-05-12 00:26:44 UTC
Interface. Gauging interest.
ballendo
2006-05-12 02:33:46 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
lcdpublishing
2006-05-12 04:34:40 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Fred Smith
2006-05-13 09:29:18 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Codesuidae
2006-05-13 17:57:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
turbulatordude
2006-05-13 18:34:05 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Codesuidae
2006-05-15 10:03:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Mariss Freimanis
2006-05-15 10:31:40 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Jack Hudler
2006-05-15 10:57:21 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Mariss Freimanis
2006-05-15 11:21:49 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Codesuidae
2006-05-15 12:23:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Roy J. Tellason
2006-05-15 12:58:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Mariss Freimanis
2006-05-15 13:09:24 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Mike Pogue
2006-05-15 13:39:03 UTC
USB-to-step/direction (was Interface. Gauging interest.)
Codesuidae
2006-05-15 13:51:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
ballendo
2006-05-15 14:41:53 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Jack Hudler
2006-05-15 14:47:30 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Mike
2006-05-15 14:53:37 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
ballendo
2006-05-15 14:54:07 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
ballendo
2006-05-15 15:07:28 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
ballendo
2006-05-15 15:08:32 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Roy J. Tellason
2006-05-15 15:24:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Roy J. Tellason
2006-05-15 15:28:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
lcdpublishing
2006-05-15 16:25:26 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Graham Stabler
2006-05-15 17:26:42 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Mariss Freimanis
2006-05-15 17:36:42 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Mariss Freimanis
2006-05-15 18:10:03 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Codesuidae
2006-05-15 18:32:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Codesuidae
2006-05-15 18:37:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] USB-to-step/direction (was Interface. Gauging interest.)
ballendo
2006-05-15 20:35:11 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Jack Hudler
2006-05-15 21:38:44 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
JanRwl@A...
2006-05-15 22:07:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Mike Pogue
2006-05-15 22:11:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] USB-to-step/direction (was Interface. Gauging interest.)
JanRwl@A...
2006-05-15 22:19:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
ballendo
2006-05-15 22:24:36 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Tony Jeffree
2006-05-15 22:32:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Dave Halliday
2006-05-15 23:01:44 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Mike Pogue
2006-05-16 00:08:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Mike Pogue
2006-05-16 00:13:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Jack Hudler
2006-05-16 00:17:01 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Mike Pogue
2006-05-16 00:18:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Lester Caine
2006-05-16 00:24:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Jack Hudler
2006-05-16 00:30:57 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
ballendo
2006-05-16 01:08:35 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
ballendo
2006-05-16 01:16:52 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
ballendo
2006-05-16 01:19:38 UTC
OT Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
ballendo
2006-05-16 01:25:07 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
ballendo
2006-05-16 01:32:25 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Graham Stabler
2006-05-16 02:07:21 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Lester Caine
2006-05-16 04:23:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
lcdpublishing
2006-05-16 06:03:14 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Alan Marconett
2006-05-16 07:49:54 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Roy J. Tellason
2006-05-16 08:04:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Alan Marconett
2006-05-16 08:23:35 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Mariss Freimanis
2006-05-16 09:11:32 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Codesuidae
2006-05-16 09:14:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Codesuidae
2006-05-16 09:23:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
gort38
2006-05-16 09:36:00 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
ballendo
2006-05-16 09:42:33 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
ballendo
2006-05-16 09:49:07 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
ballendo
2006-05-16 09:55:54 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
ballendo
2006-05-16 10:03:37 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Alan Marconett
2006-05-16 10:05:29 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Alan Marconett
2006-05-16 10:19:18 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Mariss Freimanis
2006-05-16 10:39:14 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Dan Mauch
2006-05-16 11:05:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
gort38
2006-05-16 11:32:18 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Dave Halliday
2006-05-16 11:32:57 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Mike Pogue
2006-05-16 11:51:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
wanliker@a...
2006-05-16 12:18:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Codesuidae
2006-05-16 12:35:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Alan Marconett
2006-05-16 12:36:26 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Lester Caine
2006-05-16 12:46:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Alan Marconett
2006-05-16 12:53:45 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
ballendo
2006-05-16 13:03:38 UTC
OT Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
wanliker@a...
2006-05-16 13:05:51 UTC
Interface. Gauging interest.
Codesuidae
2006-05-16 14:41:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Alan Marconett
2006-05-16 14:43:54 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Phil Mattison
2006-05-16 15:23:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Codesuidae
2006-05-16 15:40:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
ballendo
2006-05-16 15:53:31 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Steve Blackmore
2006-05-16 17:22:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Phil Mattison
2006-05-16 17:29:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Mariss Freimanis
2006-05-16 18:47:10 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Jon Elson
2006-05-16 21:44:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Lester Caine
2006-05-16 22:42:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Steve Blackmore
2006-05-17 00:05:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
lcdpublishing
2006-05-17 05:32:10 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
ballendo
2006-05-17 07:06:18 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Phil Mattison
2006-05-17 08:51:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Roy J. Tellason
2006-05-17 08:55:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
lcdpublishing
2006-05-17 09:22:57 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Phil Mattison
2006-05-17 09:47:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
ballendo
2006-05-17 09:58:14 UTC
Irrelevant Gcode?!? wasRe: Interface. Gauging interest.
ballendo
2006-05-17 10:00:45 UTC
irrelevnat Gcodes was Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
ballendo
2006-05-17 10:02:38 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
lcdpublishing
2006-05-17 10:13:56 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
ballendo
2006-05-17 10:17:41 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Fred Smith
2006-05-17 11:13:43 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Lester Caine
2006-05-17 11:40:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Alan Marconett
2006-05-17 11:57:03 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Dennis Schmitz
2006-05-17 20:30:08 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Jack Hudler
2006-05-17 21:04:17 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Jack Hudler
2006-05-17 21:04:53 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Dennis Schmitz
2006-05-17 22:01:51 UTC
Re: Irrelevant Gcode?!? wasRe: Interface. Gauging interest.
lcdpublishing
2006-05-18 04:58:52 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
ballendo
2006-05-18 05:11:22 UTC
OT Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Graham Stabler
2006-05-18 05:29:38 UTC
OT Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Steve Blackmore
2006-05-18 16:31:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
yracg
2006-05-18 20:53:29 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
JanRwl@A...
2006-05-18 21:53:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Dennis Schmitz
2006-05-18 23:18:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Mike Pogue
2006-05-19 00:51:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
yracg
2006-05-19 05:49:15 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Peter Reilley
2006-05-19 05:59:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
yracg
2006-05-19 06:22:16 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Mariss Freimanis
2006-05-19 06:58:38 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Codesuidae
2006-05-19 07:24:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Dennis Schmitz
2006-05-19 07:26:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Dennis Schmitz
2006-05-19 07:28:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Phil Mattison
2006-05-19 07:49:51 UTC
[CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Mariss Freimanis
2006-05-19 08:29:00 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
yracg
2006-05-19 08:31:36 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Wayne Weedon
2006-05-19 08:40:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Wayne C. Gramlich
2006-05-19 08:51:48 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Dennis Schmitz
2006-05-19 08:55:11 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
wanliker@a...
2006-05-19 09:11:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Lester Caine
2006-05-19 09:37:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Dennis Schmitz
2006-05-19 09:41:18 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Dennis Schmitz
2006-05-19 09:47:00 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Codesuidae
2006-05-19 09:48:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Dennis Schmitz
2006-05-19 09:53:38 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
John Dammeyer
2006-05-19 09:54:19 UTC
USB CNC (was Interface. Gauging interest.)
Jack Hudler
2006-05-19 09:57:07 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Alan Marconett
2006-05-19 10:40:21 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Alan Marconett
2006-05-19 10:56:20 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] USB CNC (was Interface. Gauging interest.)
John Dammeyer
2006-05-19 11:23:37 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] USB CNC (was Interface. Gauging interest.)
Mike Pogue
2006-05-19 11:59:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Lester Caine
2006-05-19 12:05:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Alan Marconett
2006-05-19 12:07:56 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] USB CNC (was Interface. Gauging interest.)
Mariss Freimanis
2006-05-19 12:27:31 UTC
Re: USB CNC (was Interface. Gauging interest.)
Alan Marconett
2006-05-19 12:48:01 UTC
RE: USB DLP2232M CNC, Was Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Alan Marconett
2006-05-19 12:56:08 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Wayne C. Gramlich
2006-05-19 13:33:20 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Wayne C. Gramlich
2006-05-19 13:36:36 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Wayne C. Gramlich
2006-05-19 14:00:01 UTC
Re: USB CNC (was Interface. Gauging interest.)
ballendo
2006-05-19 14:06:06 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Alan Marconett
2006-05-19 14:16:09 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: USB CNC (was Interface. Gauging interest.)
lcdpublishing
2006-05-19 14:28:40 UTC
Re: PCI interface was ....Interface. Gauging interest.
Alan Marconett
2006-05-19 14:42:25 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PCI interface was ....Interface. Gauging interest.
delmar williams
2006-05-19 14:45:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PCI interface was ....Interface. Gauging interest.
Lester Caine
2006-05-19 15:06:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PCI interface was ....Interface. Gauging interest.
Wayne C. Gramlich
2006-05-19 15:34:56 UTC
Re: USB CNC (was Interface. Gauging interest.)
Codesuidae
2006-05-19 15:48:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Wayne Weedon
2006-05-19 15:54:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
John Dammeyer
2006-05-19 17:13:01 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PCI interface was ....Interface. Gauging interest.
Paul Kelly
2006-05-19 17:19:27 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PCI interface was ....Interface. Gauging interest.
Mike Pogue
2006-05-19 17:54:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: USB DLP2232M CNC, Was Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Alan Marconett
2006-05-19 17:59:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: USB CNC (was Interface. Gauging interest.)
Anders Wallin
2006-05-19 21:49:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PCI interface was ....Interface. Gauging interest.
Wayne C. Gramlich
2006-05-20 00:00:48 UTC
Re: USB CNC (was Interface. Gauging interest.)
bob_kellock
2006-05-20 03:18:22 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Les Newell
2006-05-20 05:06:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Alan Marconett
2006-05-20 10:59:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: USB CNC (was Interface. Gauging interest.)
Wayne C. Gramlich
2006-05-20 11:58:09 UTC
Re: USB CNC (was Interface. Gauging interest.)
Mariss Freimanis
2006-05-20 13:37:35 UTC
Re: USB CNC (was Interface. Gauging interest.)
Alan Marconett
2006-05-20 14:14:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: USB CNC (was Interface. Gauging interest.)
Hugh Prescott
2006-05-20 15:13:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: USB CNC (was Interface. Gauging interest.)
Graham Stabler
2006-05-20 15:57:23 UTC
Re: USB CNC (was Interface. Gauging interest.)
Alan Marconett
2006-05-20 16:00:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: USB CNC
Dennis Schmitz
2006-05-20 16:48:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
ronginger@a...
2006-05-20 17:53:16 UTC
Re: USB CNC (was Interface. Gauging interest.)
Jack Hudler
2006-05-20 19:23:01 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PCI interface was ....Interface. Gauging interest.
Jack Hudler
2006-05-20 19:28:08 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
ballendo
2006-05-20 22:05:57 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
ballendo
2006-05-20 22:26:51 UTC
Re: USB CNC (was Interface. Gauging interest.)
Mike Pogue
2006-05-21 01:49:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: USB CNC (was Interface. Gauging interest.)
Alan Marconett
2006-05-21 10:26:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: USB CNC (was Interface. Gauging interest.)
Alan Marconett
2006-05-21 16:54:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: USB DLP2232M CNC, Was Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Mariss Freimanis
2006-06-06 19:39:41 UTC
Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Fred Smith
2006-06-06 20:44:50 UTC
ncPOD update, was Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
John Stevenson
2006-06-06 22:55:16 UTC
ncPOD update, was Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Tony Jeffree
2006-06-07 00:20:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] ncPOD update, was Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
Tony Jeffree
2006-06-07 00:30:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] ncPOD update, was Re: Interface. Gauging interest.
turbulatordude
2006-06-07 08:34:04 UTC
ncPOD update,
Fred Smith
2006-06-07 11:00:14 UTC
Re: ncPOD update,
Tony Jeffree
2006-06-07 13:19:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: ncPOD update,