Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD experiment entry
Posted by
Ron Thompson
on 2010-12-15 04:40:51 UTC
I'll venture a guess and say because milling machines don't have
automatic bar feeders. I imagine the lathe can run unattended spitting
out finished parts until the bar is finished.
For profit methods are often very different than what you would do in a
home shop.
Labor costs more than chips.
--
Ron Thompson
On the Beautiful Florida Space Coast, right beside the Kennedy Space Center, USA
Aw, I ain't that smart. I just know how to Google...
http://www.ourcadguy.com/
http://www.plansandprojects.com My hobby pages are here:
http://www.plansandprojects.com/My%20Machines/
Visit the castinghobby FAQ:
http://castinghobbyfaq.bareboogerhost.com/
automatic bar feeders. I imagine the lathe can run unattended spitting
out finished parts until the bar is finished.
For profit methods are often very different than what you would do in a
home shop.
Labor costs more than chips.
--
Ron Thompson
On the Beautiful Florida Space Coast, right beside the Kennedy Space Center, USA
Aw, I ain't that smart. I just know how to Google...
http://www.ourcadguy.com/
http://www.plansandprojects.com My hobby pages are here:
http://www.plansandprojects.com/My%20Machines/
Visit the castinghobby FAQ:
http://castinghobbyfaq.bareboogerhost.com/
On 12/15/2010 7:27 AM, William Thomas wrote:
>
> Hi Tim and All:
> THANKS FOR THE IMPUT OF THE CAD EXPERIMENT
> Tim, why don't you use a set of custom soft jaws and machine the
> nuts out of rectangle bars? This would eliminate the scrap from round
> to rectangle and half your milling with the live tools. Just a little
> harder on the start of cutoff.
> Note: I recently did this to taper turn some octagon gun barrels and
> it works!!!
>
> GOD'S BLESSINGS
>
>
> Bill Thomas
>
>
> On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 06:46:01 -0000, timgoldstein wrote
> >
> >
> > --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO%40yahoogroups.com>, "Peter Homann"
> <groups@...> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Brian,
> > >
> > > I think that this is why it is good to have a discussion here.
> There are
> > > all sorts of CAD/CAM users here so hopefully we will get some
> really good
> > > and honest reviews of various option.
> > > I've only progressed to creating 2d dxf files and feeding them through
> > > sheetcam to produce the separate processes.
> > >
> > > That's how I'd do the T-nuts. A separate layer for;
> > > 1. milling the height
> > > 2. drilling the hole
> > > 3. milling the relief
> > > 4. milling the outside rectangle
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Peter
> >
> > When I moved from using a 2D approach to using 3D models and CAM
> that uses solid models it was a revolution in productivity.
> >
> > This would be my approach if I had to do a t-nut in the mill.
> Obviously this is machinging technique and not CAD.
> >
> > 1 - Start with a piece of stock that is at least 1/8" taller than
> the finished nut.
> > 2 - Clamp in the vise on parallels with 1/8" being held.
> > 3 - Face off about .010" to give a clean and true surface.
> > 4 - Profile the entire part neck first and then the flange.
> > 5 - Spot drill with a 90 deg spot to a depth that will also create
> the chamfer in the hole.
> > 6 - Dill the hole.
> > 7 - Tap the hole. (OK so I am using a Haas with rigid tapping)
> > 8 - flip over and clamp on the neck with what will be the top
> surface of the flange on the top of the vise jaws.
> > 9 - Face off the top hat left from OP10 until the face intersects
> the already profiled flange walls.
> > 10 - Debur and tumble
> >
> > I reality we do it in the lathe with live tooling from a round bar.
> All the steps up through 8 are the same. Step 9 would be part off at
> the proper flange thickness and step 10 would be automatic bar pull
> and repeat. For the small sized Tuff nuts we make it is 75 - 140 nuts
> per 4 ft bar and 2 - 4 hours a bar. Far more efficient than using the
> mill and doing only a couple at a time.
> >
> > In the mill the top hat work holding approach is a valuable
> techinque. I was taught this by the first real machinist I hired.
> While never heard of it as a hobbyist, it is pretty much the standard
> approach in machine shops. A very useful technique regardless of what
> size machine you use.
> >
> > Tim Goldstein
> > A2Z Corp
> > A2Z CNC division
> > 3955 S Mariposa St
> > Englewood CO 80110
> > 720 833-9300
> > Toll Free 877 754-7465
> >
> > www.A2ZCorp.us/store
> > USA made accessories for desktop mills & lathes.
> > Specialized tools for the jewelry industry.
> >
> >
>
> --
> Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
timgoldstein
2010-12-12 22:14:31 UTC
CAD experiment idea
Roland Jollivet
2010-12-13 03:34:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CAD experiment idea
Jamie Cunningham
2010-12-13 03:56:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CAD experiment idea
Ron Thompson
2010-12-13 05:24:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CAD experiment idea
Tim Goldstein
2010-12-13 05:42:10 UTC
Re: CAD experiment idea
Ron Thompson
2010-12-13 06:09:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD experiment idea
Kevin Martin
2010-12-13 07:04:00 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CAD experiment idea
Stephen Wille Padnos
2010-12-13 07:06:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CAD experiment idea
Roland Jollivet
2010-12-13 07:46:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CAD experiment idea
R.L. Wurdack
2010-12-13 07:54:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CAD experiment idea
Tim Goldstein
2010-12-13 08:17:23 UTC
Re: CAD experiment idea
Tim Goldstein
2010-12-13 08:53:42 UTC
Re: CAD experiment idea
Tim Goldstein
2010-12-13 09:00:17 UTC
Re: CAD experiment idea
Tim Goldstein
2010-12-13 09:02:56 UTC
Re: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CAD experiment idea
Roland Jollivet
2010-12-13 09:06:29 UTC
[CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CAD experiment idea
timgoldstein
2010-12-13 09:17:38 UTC
Re: CAD experiment idea
Ron Thompson
2010-12-13 12:45:45 UTC
CAD experiment entry
timgoldstein
2010-12-13 12:49:59 UTC
Re: CAD experiment entry
Ron Thompson
2010-12-13 13:29:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD experiment entry
H & J Johnson
2010-12-13 15:16:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD experiment entry
Ron Thompson
2010-12-13 15:34:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD experiment entry
timgoldstein
2010-12-13 15:39:54 UTC
Re: CAD experiment entry
Ron Thompson
2010-12-13 16:00:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD experiment entry
H & J Johnson
2010-12-13 16:02:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD experiment entry
H & J Johnson
2010-12-13 16:06:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD experiment entry
timgoldstein
2010-12-13 16:25:27 UTC
Re: CAD experiment entry
Michael Fagan
2010-12-13 17:05:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CAD experiment entry
Andy Wander
2010-12-13 17:11:24 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD experiment entry
R.L. Wurdack
2010-12-13 17:24:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD experiment entry
H & J Johnson
2010-12-13 17:29:58 UTC
Re: RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD experiment entry
Andy Wander
2010-12-13 18:17:03 UTC
RE: RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD experiment entry
Peter Homann
2010-12-13 18:48:08 UTC
RE: RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD experiment entry
Andy Wander
2010-12-13 18:50:57 UTC
RE: RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD experiment entry
timgoldstein
2010-12-13 23:23:56 UTC
[CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD experiment entry
Ron Thompson
2010-12-14 05:00:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD experiment entry
Ron Thompson
2010-12-14 05:17:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD experiment entry
Ron Thompson
2010-12-14 05:43:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CAD experiment entry
Ron Thompson
2010-12-14 05:57:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CAD experiment entry
timgoldstein
2010-12-14 08:44:40 UTC
Re: CAD experiment entry
timgoldstein
2010-12-14 09:25:58 UTC
Re: CAD experiment entry
H & J Johnson
2010-12-14 09:27:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD experiment entry
Ron Thompson
2010-12-14 10:12:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD experiment entry
timgoldstein
2010-12-14 12:45:23 UTC
Re: CAD experiment entry
Ron Thompson
2010-12-14 13:39:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD experiment entry
timgoldstein
2010-12-14 15:08:47 UTC
Re: CAD experiment entry
Peter Reilley
2010-12-14 15:25:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD experiment entry
timgoldstein
2010-12-14 16:57:56 UTC
Re: CAD experiment entry
Brian Worth
2010-12-14 21:49:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD experiment entry
Peter Homann
2010-12-14 22:03:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD experiment entry
timgoldstein
2010-12-14 22:46:21 UTC
Re: CAD experiment entry
William Thomas
2010-12-15 04:27:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD experiment entry
Ron Thompson
2010-12-15 04:40:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD experiment entry
Kevin Martin
2010-12-15 05:20:51 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD experiment entry
timgoldstein
2010-12-15 06:23:27 UTC
Re: CAD experiment entry
timgoldstein
2010-12-15 06:33:51 UTC
Re: CAD experiment entry
Mike Payson
2010-12-15 06:54:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD experiment entry
timgoldstein
2010-12-15 07:00:39 UTC
Re: CAD experiment entry
Kevin Martin
2010-12-15 07:38:42 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD experiment entry
Swiss
2010-12-15 08:26:31 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD experiment entry
CNC 6-axis Designs
2010-12-15 08:29:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD experiment entry
Jon Elson
2010-12-15 10:45:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD experiment entry
timgoldstein
2010-12-15 17:05:59 UTC
Re: CAD experiment entry
Kevin Martin
2010-12-15 20:24:24 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD experiment entry
timgoldstein
2010-12-15 21:16:03 UTC
Re: CAD experiment entry
timgoldstein
2010-12-15 21:17:14 UTC
Re: CAD experiment entry
timgoldstein
2010-12-16 08:37:58 UTC
Re: CAD experiment entry
Ron Thompson
2010-12-16 09:07:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD experiment entry
Jon Elson
2010-12-16 10:08:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD experiment entry
timgoldstein
2010-12-16 14:34:40 UTC
Re: CAD experiment entry
timgoldstein
2010-12-16 15:17:46 UTC
Re: CAD experiment entry
timgoldstein
2010-12-16 16:28:39 UTC
Re: CAD experiment entry
Ron Thompson
2010-12-16 16:52:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD experiment entry
Ron Thompson
2010-12-16 16:57:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD experiment entry
timgoldstein
2010-12-16 20:45:14 UTC
Re: CAD experiment entry
William Thomas
2010-12-16 21:23:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD experiment entry
timgoldstein
2010-12-16 22:13:34 UTC
EMC, Was Re: CAD experiment entry
Stephen Wille Padnos
2010-12-17 05:28:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC, Was Re: CAD experiment entry
Jon Elson
2010-12-17 09:24:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC, Was Re: CAD experiment entry
Jon Elson
2010-12-17 09:31:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC, Was Re: CAD experiment entry
Jon Elson
2010-12-17 10:06:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC, Was Re: CAD experiment entry
Jeffrey T. Birt
2010-12-17 10:28:06 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC, Was Re: CAD experiment entry
samcoinc2001
2010-12-17 11:05:31 UTC
EMC, Was Re: CAD experiment entry
Jon Elson
2010-12-17 19:57:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC, Was Re: CAD experiment entry