Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question_2
Posted by
Danny Miller
on 2009-12-04 23:53:13 UTC
All that info should be loaded when you run the Mach3 Loader and select
the new XML file.
As far as inches/mm goes, that depends entirely on your leadscrew. The
Taig is 20 turns/in for example, which works out nicely, but if we were
to state it in mm, it would be an irrational number. I don't know Sieg
myself, but Google'd this: looks like the Sieg comes with a metric
leadscrew- whole-number ratio of turns/mm- but some people converted it
to a turns/in leadscrew. If it's metric, you'd... I guess you'd have it
in Metric mode when you define the leadscrew, then you should be ok to
change Mach3 to inch mode if you want to define the max feedrates,
acceleration, and so on. It's gonna go into Inch mode when it runs a
file which declares units to be inches anyways.
Danny
Chuck Merja wrote:
the new XML file.
As far as inches/mm goes, that depends entirely on your leadscrew. The
Taig is 20 turns/in for example, which works out nicely, but if we were
to state it in mm, it would be an irrational number. I don't know Sieg
myself, but Google'd this: looks like the Sieg comes with a metric
leadscrew- whole-number ratio of turns/mm- but some people converted it
to a turns/in leadscrew. If it's metric, you'd... I guess you'd have it
in Metric mode when you define the leadscrew, then you should be ok to
change Mach3 to inch mode if you want to define the max feedrates,
acceleration, and so on. It's gonna go into Inch mode when it runs a
file which declares units to be inches anyways.
Danny
Chuck Merja wrote:
> More newbie questions. We did a new install of MACH3 when we got the
> machine, but the previous owner sent a config file (xml) that he thought
> would allow us to not have to reconfig MACH3 to the mill. When we installed
> M3, we were asked to name the mill config, which we did - seigx3. We later
> renamed the seigx3.xml file to "old" and copied the file supplied by
> previous owner into the c:\MACH3 (default) subdirectory and renamed it to
> seigx3. Shouldn't this mean that MACH3 should be configured to the mill?
> It appears that such isn't the case, in that the parallel port had to be
> configured by hand (none of the pins were turned on or identified), and the
> motor tuning number is set at 2000. So we had to set up the parallel port
> pins and our XY travel on the DRO is way off. It appears the extents of
> travel are 0 to 118ish in X and 0 to 40 in Y, instead of 0 to 7 inches in X
> and 0 to 4 in Y. Is this adjusted in the motor tuning tab or elsewhere?
> Initial set up was in mm - we'll probably use inches, should we change that
> and recalibrate the motors? Thanks Chuck
>
>
>
>
Discussion Thread
ebiz_59
2009-12-04 08:11:58 UTC
mach3 question
Jack McKie
2009-12-04 08:21:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question
Dan Mauch
2009-12-04 08:23:09 UTC
mach3 question
Leslie Newell
2009-12-04 08:39:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question
Art Eckstein
2009-12-04 08:48:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question
Chuck Merja
2009-12-04 09:33:30 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question
Chuck Merja
2009-12-04 09:33:44 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question
Chuck Merja
2009-12-04 22:23:46 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question_2
Dave Halliday
2009-12-04 23:43:36 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question
Danny Miller
2009-12-04 23:53:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question_2
Dan Mauch
2009-12-05 12:21:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question_2
Roland Jollivet
2009-12-05 12:22:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question_2
Alfredo Sola
2009-12-05 12:22:11 UTC
Hello
imserv1
2009-12-06 08:23:05 UTC
Re: Hello
johann_ohnesorg
2009-12-07 15:32:04 UTC
Re: Hello
Chuck Merja
2009-12-10 04:03:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question_2
Alfredo Sola
2009-12-10 19:20:57 UTC
Couplings
johann_ohnesorg
2009-12-11 09:39:05 UTC
Re: Couplings
Andrew Werby
2009-12-11 11:18:18 UTC
Re: Couplings
556RECON
2009-12-11 15:49:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Couplings
Will Holding
2009-12-11 21:13:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Couplings
cncnovice
2009-12-12 10:55:49 UTC
Re: Couplings
cncnovice
2009-12-12 11:00:31 UTC
Re: Couplings
Andrew Werby
2009-12-13 12:22:16 UTC
Couplings
Peter Homann
2009-12-13 14:48:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Couplings
david@f...
2009-12-13 23:09:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Couplings
tjwal
2009-12-14 09:12:38 UTC
Re: Couplings
Alfredo Sola
2009-12-14 21:26:47 UTC
Couplings
diazden
2009-12-14 23:01:47 UTC
Re: Couplings
rhaag71
2009-12-30 15:59:44 UTC
Re: Couplings
Randall Wink
2009-12-31 12:41:56 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Couplings