Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Couplings
Posted by
Will Holding
on 2009-12-11 21:13:37 UTC
It's not so easy for some of us to make those work- a coupling with a little
compliance is easier to set up. I found the helical ones typically don't
have very high torque ratings (the ones I found) before they aren't really
backlash free (they distort under torsion).
I have become very fond of the somewhat pricy RW stainless steel bellows
couplings. No backlash, high torgue, axial and longitudinal compliant. I
know the OP was looking for cheap couplings and the RW for 640oz-in with
clamping hubs is about sixty bucks, but they are really sweet. They also
can't get jammed up with chips like a helical.
-Will
compliance is easier to set up. I found the helical ones typically don't
have very high torque ratings (the ones I found) before they aren't really
backlash free (they distort under torsion).
I have become very fond of the somewhat pricy RW stainless steel bellows
couplings. No backlash, high torgue, axial and longitudinal compliant. I
know the OP was looking for cheap couplings and the RW for 640oz-in with
clamping hubs is about sixty bucks, but they are really sweet. They also
can't get jammed up with chips like a helical.
-Will
----- Original Message -----
From: "556RECON" <556recon@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 5:09 PM
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Couplings
>I would tend to dis-agree here. There are a vast number of units out
> here that use the type pictured in the auction. mine ( a FIREBALL V90
> router) uses brass ones.
> It seems to me that if there is a danger of the lead screw mis-aligned
> so much that it might break the stepper motor shaft, then something is
> very wrong and should be fixed. My unit has worked 100's of hours with
> out a problem.
>
> OLD BOB
>
> Andrew Werby wrote:
>>
>> "Alfredo Sola" alfredo@... <mailto:alfredo%40sola.es> alfredosola
>> wrote: Good day Johann et
>> al, Following your advice on couplings, I found this. It's Chinese but
>> looks pretty decent:
>> <http://cgi.ebay.de/3x-Kupplung-Drehstarre-fuer-Schrittmotor-1-4-NEU_W0QQitemZ160382401978QQcmdZViewItemQQptZMotoren_Getriebe?hash=item2557893dba#ht_3281wt_912
>> <http://cgi.ebay.de/3x-Kupplung-Drehstarre-fuer-Schrittmotor-1-4-NEU_W0QQitemZ160382401978QQcmdZViewItemQQptZMotoren_Getriebe?hash=item2557893dba#ht_3281wt_912>>
>>
>> Also the price can't be beaten at 9,90 euros for 3 units! what do you
>> think?
>>
>> Hi Alfredo;
>>
>> If those are meant to couple a motor to a leadscrew, I don't think much
>> of them. Unless your alignment is absolutely perfect, a solid coupling
>> like that can break the end off your motor, or the stem off your
>> leadscrew. What you want for a situation like that is some kind of
>> flexible coupling, which will allow for some imprecision in the
>> positioning of the two shafts being joined. There are several basic
>> designs for this sort of thing; such as the "Lovejoy" type, which has a
>> pronged head for each shaft and a rubber "spider" that fits in between
>> them, or one that has a helical slot cut in the middle, which acts like
>> a spring, or one that has metal ends but a solid rubber center portion.
>> The Taig mills I sell have metal cylinders on the end of the motors and
>> leadscrews, which are bored with four facing holes with stiff nylon
>> tubes making the connection. Any of these solutions would be better
>> than what you're looking at on Ebay.
>>
>> Also, the simple set-screw attachment will tend to give you problems
>> over time. A better design is the clamp-type connection, which uses a
>> screw to compress the split end of the coupling over the shaft. This is
>> less likely to loosen, and if it does, it won't make a gouge in your
>> shaft that makes the coupling very difficult to remove. Yes, you can
>> save some money going with those cheap solid couplings, but you'd be
>> setting yourself up for losing a lot more down the line, not to mention
>> the frustration factor of ruining parts and having to tear your machine
>> apart to repair it and wait for parts to arrive before you can get back
>> to work. I'm not sure who sells couplings in Europe, but I'm sure you
>> can find some like this:
>>
>> http://www.anaheimautomation.com/products/coupling/flexible-coupling.php?tID=114&pt=t&cID=32
>> <http://www.anaheimautomation.com/products/coupling/flexible-coupling.php?tID=114&pt=t&cID=32>
>>
>> Good luck;
>>
>> Andrew Werby
>> www.computersculpture.com
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...,
> timg@...
> Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... davemucha@...
> [Moderators]
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
> aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it
> if you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a
> sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for
> OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM.
> DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> bill
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
Discussion Thread
ebiz_59
2009-12-04 08:11:58 UTC
mach3 question
Jack McKie
2009-12-04 08:21:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question
Dan Mauch
2009-12-04 08:23:09 UTC
mach3 question
Leslie Newell
2009-12-04 08:39:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question
Art Eckstein
2009-12-04 08:48:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question
Chuck Merja
2009-12-04 09:33:30 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question
Chuck Merja
2009-12-04 09:33:44 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question
Chuck Merja
2009-12-04 22:23:46 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question_2
Dave Halliday
2009-12-04 23:43:36 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question
Danny Miller
2009-12-04 23:53:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question_2
Dan Mauch
2009-12-05 12:21:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question_2
Roland Jollivet
2009-12-05 12:22:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question_2
Alfredo Sola
2009-12-05 12:22:11 UTC
Hello
imserv1
2009-12-06 08:23:05 UTC
Re: Hello
johann_ohnesorg
2009-12-07 15:32:04 UTC
Re: Hello
Chuck Merja
2009-12-10 04:03:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question_2
Alfredo Sola
2009-12-10 19:20:57 UTC
Couplings
johann_ohnesorg
2009-12-11 09:39:05 UTC
Re: Couplings
Andrew Werby
2009-12-11 11:18:18 UTC
Re: Couplings
556RECON
2009-12-11 15:49:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Couplings
Will Holding
2009-12-11 21:13:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Couplings
cncnovice
2009-12-12 10:55:49 UTC
Re: Couplings
cncnovice
2009-12-12 11:00:31 UTC
Re: Couplings
Andrew Werby
2009-12-13 12:22:16 UTC
Couplings
Peter Homann
2009-12-13 14:48:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Couplings
david@f...
2009-12-13 23:09:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Couplings
tjwal
2009-12-14 09:12:38 UTC
Re: Couplings
Alfredo Sola
2009-12-14 21:26:47 UTC
Couplings
diazden
2009-12-14 23:01:47 UTC
Re: Couplings
rhaag71
2009-12-30 15:59:44 UTC
Re: Couplings
Randall Wink
2009-12-31 12:41:56 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Couplings