Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Couplings
Posted by
david@f...
on 2009-12-13 23:09:39 UTC
as andrew mentioned, it's probably a good idea to get a flexible
zero-backlash coupling. we prefer the helical type or the type with the
wavy spring in between both halves. either way, the point is to allow
you to have some error in your positioning of the motor/shaft.
--
--
Spindle Lock for your Rong-Fu 45, Lathemaster, Sieg X3 <http://www.spindle-lock.com>
CNC, Plans/Kits, 8x12 Lathe, Mini-Mill, How-Tos <http://www.fignoggle.com>
Sieg X3/Super X3 Mill Information, HF/Enco Coupons <http://www.superx3.com>
Andrew Werby wrote:
zero-backlash coupling. we prefer the helical type or the type with the
wavy spring in between both halves. either way, the point is to allow
you to have some error in your positioning of the motor/shaft.
--
--
Spindle Lock for your Rong-Fu 45, Lathemaster, Sieg X3 <http://www.spindle-lock.com>
CNC, Plans/Kits, 8x12 Lathe, Mini-Mill, How-Tos <http://www.fignoggle.com>
Sieg X3/Super X3 Mill Information, HF/Enco Coupons <http://www.superx3.com>
Andrew Werby wrote:
>
> "Alfredo Sola" alfredo@... <mailto:alfredo%40sola.es> alfredosola
> wrote: Good day Johann et
> al, Following your advice on couplings, I found this. It's Chinese but
> looks pretty decent:
> <http://cgi.ebay.de/3x-Kupplung-Drehstarre-fuer-Schrittmotor-1-4-NEU_W0QQitemZ160382401978QQcmdZViewItemQQptZMotoren_Getriebe?hash=item2557893dba#ht_3281wt_912
> <http://cgi.ebay.de/3x-Kupplung-Drehstarre-fuer-Schrittmotor-1-4-NEU_W0QQitemZ160382401978QQcmdZViewItemQQptZMotoren_Getriebe?hash=item2557893dba#ht_3281wt_912>>
>
> Also the price can't be beaten at 9,90 euros for 3 units! what do you
> think?
>
> Hi Alfredo;
>
> If those are meant to couple a motor to a leadscrew, I don't think much
> of them. Unless your alignment is absolutely perfect, a solid coupling
> like that can break the end off your motor, or the stem off your
> leadscrew. What you want for a situation like that is some kind of
> flexible coupling, which will allow for some imprecision in the
> positioning of the two shafts being joined. There are several basic
> designs for this sort of thing; such as the "Lovejoy" type, which has a
> pronged head for each shaft and a rubber "spider" that fits in between
> them, or one that has a helical slot cut in the middle, which acts like
> a spring, or one that has metal ends but a solid rubber center portion.
> The Taig mills I sell have metal cylinders on the end of the motors and
> leadscrews, which are bored with four facing holes with stiff nylon
> tubes making the connection. Any of these solutions would be better
> than what you're looking at on Ebay.
>
> Also, the simple set-screw attachment will tend to give you problems
> over time. A better design is the clamp-type connection, which uses a
> screw to compress the split end of the coupling over the shaft. This is
> less likely to loosen, and if it does, it won't make a gouge in your
> shaft that makes the coupling very difficult to remove. Yes, you can
> save some money going with those cheap solid couplings, but you'd be
> setting yourself up for losing a lot more down the line, not to mention
> the frustration factor of ruining parts and having to tear your machine
> apart to repair it and wait for parts to arrive before you can get back
> to work. I'm not sure who sells couplings in Europe, but I'm sure you
> can find some like this:
>
> http://www.anaheimautomation.com/products/coupling/flexible-coupling.php?tID=114&pt=t&cID=32
> <http://www.anaheimautomation.com/products/coupling/flexible-coupling.php?tID=114&pt=t&cID=32>
>
> Good luck;
>
> Andrew Werby
> www.computersculpture.com
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.
Discussion Thread
ebiz_59
2009-12-04 08:11:58 UTC
mach3 question
Jack McKie
2009-12-04 08:21:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question
Dan Mauch
2009-12-04 08:23:09 UTC
mach3 question
Leslie Newell
2009-12-04 08:39:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question
Art Eckstein
2009-12-04 08:48:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question
Chuck Merja
2009-12-04 09:33:30 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question
Chuck Merja
2009-12-04 09:33:44 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question
Chuck Merja
2009-12-04 22:23:46 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question_2
Dave Halliday
2009-12-04 23:43:36 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question
Danny Miller
2009-12-04 23:53:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question_2
Dan Mauch
2009-12-05 12:21:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question_2
Roland Jollivet
2009-12-05 12:22:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question_2
Alfredo Sola
2009-12-05 12:22:11 UTC
Hello
imserv1
2009-12-06 08:23:05 UTC
Re: Hello
johann_ohnesorg
2009-12-07 15:32:04 UTC
Re: Hello
Chuck Merja
2009-12-10 04:03:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question_2
Alfredo Sola
2009-12-10 19:20:57 UTC
Couplings
johann_ohnesorg
2009-12-11 09:39:05 UTC
Re: Couplings
Andrew Werby
2009-12-11 11:18:18 UTC
Re: Couplings
556RECON
2009-12-11 15:49:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Couplings
Will Holding
2009-12-11 21:13:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Couplings
cncnovice
2009-12-12 10:55:49 UTC
Re: Couplings
cncnovice
2009-12-12 11:00:31 UTC
Re: Couplings
Andrew Werby
2009-12-13 12:22:16 UTC
Couplings
Peter Homann
2009-12-13 14:48:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Couplings
david@f...
2009-12-13 23:09:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Couplings
tjwal
2009-12-14 09:12:38 UTC
Re: Couplings
Alfredo Sola
2009-12-14 21:26:47 UTC
Couplings
diazden
2009-12-14 23:01:47 UTC
Re: Couplings
rhaag71
2009-12-30 15:59:44 UTC
Re: Couplings
Randall Wink
2009-12-31 12:41:56 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Couplings