Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question_2
Posted by
Roland Jollivet
on 2009-12-05 12:22:07 UTC
For CNC, it really does not matter what the leadscrew pitch is. It could be
17.357 turns/inch. The floating point math works it out to a precision far
beyond the mechanical tolerances. It's only humans that like 'nice' round
numbers.
Roland
2009/12/5 Danny Miller <dannym@...>
17.357 turns/inch. The floating point math works it out to a precision far
beyond the mechanical tolerances. It's only humans that like 'nice' round
numbers.
Roland
2009/12/5 Danny Miller <dannym@...>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> All that info should be loaded when you run the Mach3 Loader and select
> the new XML file.
>
> As far as inches/mm goes, that depends entirely on your leadscrew. The
> Taig is 20 turns/in for example, which works out nicely, but if we were
> to state it in mm, it would be an irrational number. I don't know Sieg
> myself, but Google'd this: looks like the Sieg comes with a metric
> leadscrew- whole-number ratio of turns/mm- but some people converted it
> to a turns/in leadscrew. If it's metric, you'd... I guess you'd have it
> in Metric mode when you define the leadscrew, then you should be ok to
> change Mach3 to inch mode if you want to define the max feedrates,
> acceleration, and so on. It's gonna go into Inch mode when it runs a
> file which declares units to be inches anyways.
>
> Danny
>
>
> Chuck Merja wrote:
> > More newbie questions. We did a new install of MACH3 when we got the
> > machine, but the previous owner sent a config file (xml) that he thought
> > would allow us to not have to reconfig MACH3 to the mill. When we
> installed
> > M3, we were asked to name the mill config, which we did - seigx3. We
> later
> > renamed the seigx3.xml file to "old" and copied the file supplied by
> > previous owner into the c:\MACH3 (default) subdirectory and renamed it to
> > seigx3. Shouldn't this mean that MACH3 should be configured to the mill?
> > It appears that such isn't the case, in that the parallel port had to be
> > configured by hand (none of the pins were turned on or identified), and
> the
> > motor tuning number is set at 2000. So we had to set up the parallel port
> > pins and our XY travel on the DRO is way off. It appears the extents of
> > travel are 0 to 118ish in X and 0 to 40 in Y, instead of 0 to 7 inches in
> X
> > and 0 to 4 in Y. Is this adjusted in the motor tuning tab or elsewhere?
> > Initial set up was in mm - we'll probably use inches, should we change
> that
> > and recalibrate the motors? Thanks Chuck
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
Discussion Thread
ebiz_59
2009-12-04 08:11:58 UTC
mach3 question
Jack McKie
2009-12-04 08:21:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question
Dan Mauch
2009-12-04 08:23:09 UTC
mach3 question
Leslie Newell
2009-12-04 08:39:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question
Art Eckstein
2009-12-04 08:48:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question
Chuck Merja
2009-12-04 09:33:30 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question
Chuck Merja
2009-12-04 09:33:44 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question
Chuck Merja
2009-12-04 22:23:46 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question_2
Dave Halliday
2009-12-04 23:43:36 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question
Danny Miller
2009-12-04 23:53:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question_2
Dan Mauch
2009-12-05 12:21:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question_2
Roland Jollivet
2009-12-05 12:22:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question_2
Alfredo Sola
2009-12-05 12:22:11 UTC
Hello
imserv1
2009-12-06 08:23:05 UTC
Re: Hello
johann_ohnesorg
2009-12-07 15:32:04 UTC
Re: Hello
Chuck Merja
2009-12-10 04:03:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question_2
Alfredo Sola
2009-12-10 19:20:57 UTC
Couplings
johann_ohnesorg
2009-12-11 09:39:05 UTC
Re: Couplings
Andrew Werby
2009-12-11 11:18:18 UTC
Re: Couplings
556RECON
2009-12-11 15:49:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Couplings
Will Holding
2009-12-11 21:13:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Couplings
cncnovice
2009-12-12 10:55:49 UTC
Re: Couplings
cncnovice
2009-12-12 11:00:31 UTC
Re: Couplings
Andrew Werby
2009-12-13 12:22:16 UTC
Couplings
Peter Homann
2009-12-13 14:48:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Couplings
david@f...
2009-12-13 23:09:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Couplings
tjwal
2009-12-14 09:12:38 UTC
Re: Couplings
Alfredo Sola
2009-12-14 21:26:47 UTC
Couplings
diazden
2009-12-14 23:01:47 UTC
Re: Couplings
rhaag71
2009-12-30 15:59:44 UTC
Re: Couplings
Randall Wink
2009-12-31 12:41:56 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Couplings