Re: Couplings
    Posted by
    
      johann_ohnesorg
    
  
  
    on 2009-12-11 09:39:05 UTC
  
  ...price can't be beaten at 9,90 euros for 3 units! what do you 
this would be waste 10 euros. There is no flex in the coupling because there is no plastic or rubber anywhere between the two drilled holes, it´s a stiff piece of metal with two holes and a few grub screws.
The job of a coupling is to mitigate small angular and parallel misalignment that would lead to stiffness in your drivetrain and to add a little bit of dampening by taking out the stiffness from the drive. In case you don´t use these couplers, you may experience resonances from the motor and also you may have a stiff position (even if it´s only slightly) in the spindles rotation thay may lead to step loss at higher speeds. It also contributes to noise and will eat up power that would otherwise enable you to use higher feeds and cost you drive torque.
The right way to go is via couplings or to use a toothbelt plus two wheels and offset the motor from the axis. This is not necessary on your smalll machine. You need something that will eliminate or soften misalignment but keep your drivetrain as stiff as possible. If the couplings are to expensive go via a the tube routine. If you want to simulate bigger couplings and you don´t want to rework the standoffs of your motor carrier plates in case you switch to couplings (which are huge compared to the tube solution) then cut two pieces of aluminum to size and attach a rubber hose with say 20mm ID on the larger chunks of aluminum. It´s not a shame to do it this way. Being tight on the money with the couplings will lead to problems further down the road.
In case you need someone to convey information to a german seller after you bought the couplings, feel free to email me in English, I´ll translate it.
Cheers,
Johann
> think?Hola Alfredo,
this would be waste 10 euros. There is no flex in the coupling because there is no plastic or rubber anywhere between the two drilled holes, it´s a stiff piece of metal with two holes and a few grub screws.
The job of a coupling is to mitigate small angular and parallel misalignment that would lead to stiffness in your drivetrain and to add a little bit of dampening by taking out the stiffness from the drive. In case you don´t use these couplers, you may experience resonances from the motor and also you may have a stiff position (even if it´s only slightly) in the spindles rotation thay may lead to step loss at higher speeds. It also contributes to noise and will eat up power that would otherwise enable you to use higher feeds and cost you drive torque.
The right way to go is via couplings or to use a toothbelt plus two wheels and offset the motor from the axis. This is not necessary on your smalll machine. You need something that will eliminate or soften misalignment but keep your drivetrain as stiff as possible. If the couplings are to expensive go via a the tube routine. If you want to simulate bigger couplings and you don´t want to rework the standoffs of your motor carrier plates in case you switch to couplings (which are huge compared to the tube solution) then cut two pieces of aluminum to size and attach a rubber hose with say 20mm ID on the larger chunks of aluminum. It´s not a shame to do it this way. Being tight on the money with the couplings will lead to problems further down the road.
In case you need someone to convey information to a german seller after you bought the couplings, feel free to email me in English, I´ll translate it.
Cheers,
Johann
Discussion Thread
  
    ebiz_59
  
2009-12-04 08:11:58 UTC
  mach3 question
  
    Jack McKie
  
2009-12-04 08:21:33 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question
  
    Dan Mauch
  
2009-12-04 08:23:09 UTC
  mach3 question
  
    Leslie Newell
  
2009-12-04 08:39:42 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question
  
    Art Eckstein
  
2009-12-04 08:48:50 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question
  
    Chuck Merja
  
2009-12-04 09:33:30 UTC
  RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question
  
    Chuck Merja
  
2009-12-04 09:33:44 UTC
  RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question
  
    Chuck Merja
  
2009-12-04 22:23:46 UTC
  RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question_2
  
    Dave Halliday
  
2009-12-04 23:43:36 UTC
  RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question
  
    Danny Miller
  
2009-12-04 23:53:13 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question_2
  
    Dan Mauch
  
2009-12-05 12:21:53 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question_2
  
    Roland Jollivet
  
2009-12-05 12:22:07 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question_2
  
    Alfredo Sola
  
2009-12-05 12:22:11 UTC
  Hello
  
    imserv1
  
2009-12-06 08:23:05 UTC
  Re: Hello
  
    johann_ohnesorg
  
2009-12-07 15:32:04 UTC
  Re: Hello
  
    Chuck Merja
  
2009-12-10 04:03:11 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question_2
  
    Alfredo Sola
  
2009-12-10 19:20:57 UTC
  Couplings
  
    johann_ohnesorg
  
2009-12-11 09:39:05 UTC
  Re: Couplings
  
    Andrew Werby
  
2009-12-11 11:18:18 UTC
  Re: Couplings
  
    556RECON
  
2009-12-11 15:49:54 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Couplings
  
    Will Holding
  
2009-12-11 21:13:37 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Couplings
  
    cncnovice
  
2009-12-12 10:55:49 UTC
  Re: Couplings
  
    cncnovice
  
2009-12-12 11:00:31 UTC
  Re: Couplings
  
    Andrew Werby
  
2009-12-13 12:22:16 UTC
  Couplings
  
    Peter Homann
  
2009-12-13 14:48:02 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Couplings
  
    david@f...
  
2009-12-13 23:09:39 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Couplings
  
    tjwal
  
2009-12-14 09:12:38 UTC
  Re: Couplings
  
    Alfredo Sola
  
2009-12-14 21:26:47 UTC
  Couplings
  
    diazden
  
2009-12-14 23:01:47 UTC
  Re: Couplings
  
    rhaag71
  
2009-12-30 15:59:44 UTC
  Re: Couplings
  
    Randall Wink
  
2009-12-31 12:41:56 UTC
  RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Couplings