Re: Couplings
Posted by
johann_ohnesorg
on 2009-12-11 09:39:05 UTC
...price can't be beaten at 9,90 euros for 3 units! what do you
this would be waste 10 euros. There is no flex in the coupling because there is no plastic or rubber anywhere between the two drilled holes, it´s a stiff piece of metal with two holes and a few grub screws.
The job of a coupling is to mitigate small angular and parallel misalignment that would lead to stiffness in your drivetrain and to add a little bit of dampening by taking out the stiffness from the drive. In case you don´t use these couplers, you may experience resonances from the motor and also you may have a stiff position (even if it´s only slightly) in the spindles rotation thay may lead to step loss at higher speeds. It also contributes to noise and will eat up power that would otherwise enable you to use higher feeds and cost you drive torque.
The right way to go is via couplings or to use a toothbelt plus two wheels and offset the motor from the axis. This is not necessary on your smalll machine. You need something that will eliminate or soften misalignment but keep your drivetrain as stiff as possible. If the couplings are to expensive go via a the tube routine. If you want to simulate bigger couplings and you don´t want to rework the standoffs of your motor carrier plates in case you switch to couplings (which are huge compared to the tube solution) then cut two pieces of aluminum to size and attach a rubber hose with say 20mm ID on the larger chunks of aluminum. It´s not a shame to do it this way. Being tight on the money with the couplings will lead to problems further down the road.
In case you need someone to convey information to a german seller after you bought the couplings, feel free to email me in English, I´ll translate it.
Cheers,
Johann
> think?Hola Alfredo,
this would be waste 10 euros. There is no flex in the coupling because there is no plastic or rubber anywhere between the two drilled holes, it´s a stiff piece of metal with two holes and a few grub screws.
The job of a coupling is to mitigate small angular and parallel misalignment that would lead to stiffness in your drivetrain and to add a little bit of dampening by taking out the stiffness from the drive. In case you don´t use these couplers, you may experience resonances from the motor and also you may have a stiff position (even if it´s only slightly) in the spindles rotation thay may lead to step loss at higher speeds. It also contributes to noise and will eat up power that would otherwise enable you to use higher feeds and cost you drive torque.
The right way to go is via couplings or to use a toothbelt plus two wheels and offset the motor from the axis. This is not necessary on your smalll machine. You need something that will eliminate or soften misalignment but keep your drivetrain as stiff as possible. If the couplings are to expensive go via a the tube routine. If you want to simulate bigger couplings and you don´t want to rework the standoffs of your motor carrier plates in case you switch to couplings (which are huge compared to the tube solution) then cut two pieces of aluminum to size and attach a rubber hose with say 20mm ID on the larger chunks of aluminum. It´s not a shame to do it this way. Being tight on the money with the couplings will lead to problems further down the road.
In case you need someone to convey information to a german seller after you bought the couplings, feel free to email me in English, I´ll translate it.
Cheers,
Johann
Discussion Thread
ebiz_59
2009-12-04 08:11:58 UTC
mach3 question
Jack McKie
2009-12-04 08:21:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question
Dan Mauch
2009-12-04 08:23:09 UTC
mach3 question
Leslie Newell
2009-12-04 08:39:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question
Art Eckstein
2009-12-04 08:48:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question
Chuck Merja
2009-12-04 09:33:30 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question
Chuck Merja
2009-12-04 09:33:44 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question
Chuck Merja
2009-12-04 22:23:46 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question_2
Dave Halliday
2009-12-04 23:43:36 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question
Danny Miller
2009-12-04 23:53:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question_2
Dan Mauch
2009-12-05 12:21:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question_2
Roland Jollivet
2009-12-05 12:22:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question_2
Alfredo Sola
2009-12-05 12:22:11 UTC
Hello
imserv1
2009-12-06 08:23:05 UTC
Re: Hello
johann_ohnesorg
2009-12-07 15:32:04 UTC
Re: Hello
Chuck Merja
2009-12-10 04:03:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach3 question_2
Alfredo Sola
2009-12-10 19:20:57 UTC
Couplings
johann_ohnesorg
2009-12-11 09:39:05 UTC
Re: Couplings
Andrew Werby
2009-12-11 11:18:18 UTC
Re: Couplings
556RECON
2009-12-11 15:49:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Couplings
Will Holding
2009-12-11 21:13:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Couplings
cncnovice
2009-12-12 10:55:49 UTC
Re: Couplings
cncnovice
2009-12-12 11:00:31 UTC
Re: Couplings
Andrew Werby
2009-12-13 12:22:16 UTC
Couplings
Peter Homann
2009-12-13 14:48:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Couplings
david@f...
2009-12-13 23:09:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Couplings
tjwal
2009-12-14 09:12:38 UTC
Re: Couplings
Alfredo Sola
2009-12-14 21:26:47 UTC
Couplings
diazden
2009-12-14 23:01:47 UTC
Re: Couplings
rhaag71
2009-12-30 15:59:44 UTC
Re: Couplings
Randall Wink
2009-12-31 12:41:56 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Couplings