CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: mini-mill and motors

on 2011-11-15 02:59:25 UTC
I can see that you would not recommend that supply. as far as I can tell, you have no understanding of the xylotex and shun them for any use whatsoever.






--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Danny Miller <dannym@...> wrote:
>
> If you get a Geckodrive, the 48V Sun 25A supply is not only much more
> appropriate, it's actually almost the same price!
>
> ~$35 on eBay with shipping INCLUDED. Versus $20 from Allelectronics +
> shipping isn't much less, and I wouldn't even recommend that supply in
> the first place.
>
> Danny
>
> On 11/14/2011 8:03 PM, turbulatordude wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > first off, the mini-mill has a horrible design flaw. you cannot easily lube the ways on the longitudinal travel.
> > if your machine is getting tight at the ends, then the center is worn and the ends are not. that is a mechanical problem that motors might or might not solve.
> >
> > if you are open to driving the motors harder, then you do need to ditch the xylotex and put on something more robust.
> >
> > the geckos will run the machine better.
> > what I would offer is that you get the $20 power supply from allelectroncis and keep the control panel. remove it from the mini-mill and put it on a small table top router type of unit.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Chuck Merja"<chuckm@> wrote:
> >>
> >> WOW –My initialtion of the Xylotex thread was 3 minutes into Sunday the
> >> 13th, then I went to bed. Dave replied at 12:19, 16 minutes later. Then
> >> later Sunday AM, I sent the thread below (sent at 08:23 on Nov 13) as a
> >> reply to Dave's initial reply about the Xylotex power supply. Somehow it
> >> took 18 hours to hit the listserv and there had already been a lot of
> >> advice, so the question about steppers looks really out of context. Am I
> >> doin something wrong with my posts?
> >>
> >> Anyway, the motors on the minimill that is run by Xylotex whose power supply
> >> just went south are the Automation Direct units described below – they are
> >> about 2.25" square so I am thinking they are NEMA 23. They seem too weak
> >> for the minimill, as if I tighten the gib enough to have the center of
> >> travel reasonably tight I miss steps at the endpoints of travel, so I really
> >> only have about 5" of the "monster" 7" travel on this minimill. I've had
> >> the table off several times, thinking that I needed to do something
> >> mechanical to the ways/gib to make the table drag more uniform, and with
> >> power off I can turn the table to the full "X" range by hand, so I really
> >> think a little stronger steppers is what I'd like. So I'm wondering if a
> >> different controller (than the Xylotex) on these steppers would help or if I
> >> need different steppers. The X and Y screws are ACME 5/8 x 8 thread and I
> >> built a plastic antibacklash nut for X, that seems to work pretty well, but
> >> needs slightly more torque to turn (but I can still get "X" to both ends by
> >> hand with power off).
> >>
> >> And for the router, I'm thinking it would be something like a 12"x12 or
> >> maybe18" gantry type router – maybe a Rockcliff or something similar. I
> >> thot I'd use something like ½"-20 allthread to run the X/Y. Would the
> >> Xylotex run something like that or have I outgrown the Xylotex? I was
> >> hoping to use it (Xylotex) to run both for a while, until there was more
> >> demand for the technology, then we could justify separate controllers, but
> >> maybe I just need to build a totally separate unit/control.
> >>
> >> So many projects – so little time. I was "showing off" to the kids and we
> >> were making our first ever real part for one of our competition robots when
> >> the Xylotex power supply went south. The wind went out of the sails on this
> >> CNC project with that one :o((
> >>
> >> C
> >> first, changed the subject line. not about xylotex anymore
> >>
> >> if you have a decent control box. great. get more cables. do not try to
> >> switch them. only adds a weak spot, one that could blow out the driver. very
> >> risky.
> >>
> >> I would keep that control box, and start a new project for a new box.
> >> and, yes, if you feel your motors are under powered, there are options. a
> >> Gecko would be my recomendation. but which one ?
> >>
> >> first nema 23 ? 34?
> >> what voltage is your power supply ?
> >> what type of machine ?
> >>
> >> before anyone can offer a potential solution, we need the basics.
> >>
> >> Dave
> >>
> >> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> >> <mailto:CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO%40yahoogroups.com> , "chuck"<chuckm@> wrote:
> >>> Thanks, a question about steppers... I have
> >>> Automation direct
> >>> Sure step
> >>> 1.8 deg/step
> >>> 276 ozin
> >>> 2.8amps
> >>> Would these fit your definition of "low voltage"? They seem too weak to
> >> me- I have to run pretty light gib pressure. If not, could u recommend
> >> steppers?
> >>> And one other question. I'm looking at making a wood, plastic, light metal
> >> router and am thinking that I'd like to use the same stepper drivers and
> >> computer - at least initially. So I might change motor cables between the
> >> two machines or even find a stack of db9 "AB" boxes. Any thots about that
> >> would be welcome.
> >>> Thx, C
> >>> Sent via my "ChuckBerry" by AT&T
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Addresses:
> > FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> > FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> > Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@..., timg@...
> > Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... davemucha@... [Moderators]
> > URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> >
> > OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> > If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto: aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if you have trouble.
> > http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
> >
> > NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> > bill
> > List Mom
> > List Owner
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Discussion Thread

ebiz_59 2011-11-12 23:02:30 UTC Xylotex Pwr Sup replacement Danny Miller 2011-11-12 23:18:51 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Xylotex Pwr Sup replacement Michael Fagan 2011-11-13 06:52:07 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Xylotex Pwr Sup replacement "hanermo" - CNC 6-axis Designs 2011-11-13 07:16:19 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Xylotex Pwr Sup replacement Michael Fagan 2011-11-13 07:19:26 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Xylotex Pwr Sup replacement turbulatordude 2011-11-13 09:08:22 UTC Re: Xylotex Pwr Sup replacement Chuck Merja 2011-11-13 10:22:59 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Xylotex Pwr Sup replacement Danny Miller 2011-11-13 14:11:02 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Xylotex Pwr Sup replacement Dave Halliday 2011-11-13 14:36:15 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Xylotex Pwr Sup replacement Danny Miller 2011-11-13 14:58:32 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Xylotex Pwr Sup replacement turbulatordude 2011-11-13 16:01:52 UTC Re: Xylotex Pwr Sup replacement Danny Miller 2011-11-13 16:27:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Xylotex Pwr Sup replacement turbulatordude 2011-11-13 17:34:38 UTC Re: Xylotex Pwr Sup replacement turbulatordude 2011-11-13 17:38:18 UTC Re: Xylotex Pwr Sup replacement turbulatordude 2011-11-13 17:46:21 UTC Re: Xylotex Pwr Sup replacement Danny Miller 2011-11-13 18:15:45 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Xylotex Pwr Sup replacement Andy Wander 2011-11-13 18:37:30 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Xylotex Pwr Sup replacement Dave Halliday 2011-11-13 21:07:46 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Xylotex Pwr Sup replacement Dave Halliday 2011-11-13 21:07:47 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Xylotex Pwr Sup replacement Danny Miller 2011-11-13 23:48:03 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Xylotex Pwr Sup replacement turbulatordude 2011-11-14 01:02:04 UTC Re: Xylotex Pwr Sup replacement chuck 2011-11-14 01:10:50 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Xylotex Pwr Sup replacement turbulatordude 2011-11-14 01:16:21 UTC automation direct sure step "hanermo" - CNC 6-axis Designs 2011-11-14 01:35:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Xylotex Pwr Sup replacement Andy Wander 2011-11-14 06:15:09 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Xylotex Pwr Sup replacement Chuck Merja 2011-11-14 07:24:15 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] automation direct sure step David G. LeVine 2011-11-14 10:37:30 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Xylotex Pwr Sup replacement "hanermo" - CNC 6-axis Designs 2011-11-14 11:43:34 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Xylotex Pwr Sup replacement Danny Miller 2011-11-14 11:52:59 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Xylotex Pwr Sup replacement turbulatordude 2011-11-14 18:04:01 UTC mini-mill and motors Danny Miller 2011-11-14 22:31:51 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mini-mill and motors turbulatordude 2011-11-15 02:59:25 UTC Re: mini-mill and motors Chuck Merja 2011-11-15 22:14:44 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Xylotex Pwr Sup replacement "hanermo" - CNC 6-axis Designs 2011-11-16 00:59:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mini-mill and motors turbulatordude 2011-11-16 04:27:07 UTC Re: Xylotex Pwr Sup replacement Ron Thompson 2011-11-16 05:19:26 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Xylotex Pwr Sup replacement Chuck Merja 2011-11-17 08:02:40 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko G540 Ron Thompson 2011-11-17 08:43:34 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko G540 Michael Fagan 2011-11-17 11:24:43 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko G540 Peter Homann 2011-11-17 12:54:52 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko G540 robin 2012-01-16 11:03:22 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Xylotex Pwr Sup replacement