Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Posted by
Joe Vicars
on 2001-04-09 06:24:31 UTC
For jewlers I guess it's because gold and platinum swarf is pretty expensive.
For non jewlers it is a prototype thing. Several reasons:
1. Test and de-bug complicated programs without crashing a tool, or scrapping expensive blanks
2. Test how the part will pour and cool (sink, porisity etc.) before you build a tool
3. Experiemtent with gates and runners, same reason as above
4. You have a little bitty machine that cuts wax faster and easier than stainless steel
5. Po man's rapid prototype
Just a fr' instance, I'm sure others have other reasons.
Ian Wright wrote:
For non jewlers it is a prototype thing. Several reasons:
1. Test and de-bug complicated programs without crashing a tool, or scrapping expensive blanks
2. Test how the part will pour and cool (sink, porisity etc.) before you build a tool
3. Experiemtent with gates and runners, same reason as above
4. You have a little bitty machine that cuts wax faster and easier than stainless steel
5. Po man's rapid prototype
Just a fr' instance, I'm sure others have other reasons.
Ian Wright wrote:
> This may be a silly question but why would one want to cut individual wax
> patterns to cast rather than just machining the final metal?
>
> Ian
> --
> Ian W. Wright
> Sheffield UK
> www.iw63.freeserve.co.uk
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Smoke" <gordonr@...>
> To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: 09 April 2001 04:48
> Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
>
> > I'd recommend using a HARD machinable wax rather than the wax you normally
> > use for jewelry work. Another option (recommended) would be to carve in
> > some other material, make a mold from the carving and then cast a pattern
> > from low temp wax to use in your lost wax casting
>
> Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.
>
> Addresses:
> Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
> URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> bill,
> List Manager
>
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Discussion Thread
William Reidsema
2001-04-08 03:25:30 UTC
Machineable wax problem
jvicars@c...
2001-04-08 07:36:24 UTC
Re: Machineable wax problem
Larry Goldberg
2001-04-08 08:05:53 UTC
Re: Machineable wax problem
Marcus & Eva
2001-04-08 08:11:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
dougrasmussen@c...
2001-04-08 08:47:37 UTC
Re: Machineable wax problem
Bill Darby
2001-04-08 09:17:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Jon Anderson
2001-04-08 10:14:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Jon Anderson
2001-04-08 10:17:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
wanliker@a...
2001-04-08 10:28:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Machineable wax problem
JanRwl@A...
2001-04-08 13:46:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
jesse
2001-04-08 13:49:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Jeff Demand
2001-04-08 14:39:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Marcus & Eva
2001-04-08 18:54:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Jerry Kimberlin
2001-04-08 19:02:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
jvicars@c...
2001-04-08 19:25:06 UTC
Re: Machineable wax problem
Jerry Kimberlin
2001-04-08 19:47:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Machineable wax problem
jesse
2001-04-08 20:44:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Machineable wax problem
Smoke
2001-04-08 20:52:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Ian Wright
2001-04-09 05:10:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Joe Vicars
2001-04-09 06:24:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Jon Anderson
2001-04-09 06:42:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Marcus & Eva
2001-04-09 07:16:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Sven Peter, TAD S.A.
2001-04-09 07:42:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Jon Elson
2001-04-09 11:36:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Ian Wright
2001-04-09 11:55:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Andrew Werby
2001-04-09 12:48:17 UTC
Machineable wax problem
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-04-09 12:50:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
stratton@m...
2001-04-09 12:57:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
jesse
2001-04-09 13:25:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Dennis Cranston
2001-04-09 13:40:31 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Ian Wright
2001-04-09 14:57:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
R. T. Robbins
2001-04-09 20:08:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
jesse
2001-04-09 21:16:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
jesse
2001-04-09 21:21:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
alenz@c...
2001-04-09 22:41:11 UTC
Re: Machineable wax problem