Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Posted by
jesse
on 2001-04-09 21:21:17 UTC
The urethane burning comment was just a warning to be careful out there.
There are materials that are a lot easier to investment cast than machine. For high value short runs or prototyping machining
multiple wax patterns may be the least evil.
Jesse
Ian Wright wrote:
There are materials that are a lot easier to investment cast than machine. For high value short runs or prototyping machining
multiple wax patterns may be the least evil.
Jesse
Ian Wright wrote:
> Ok, I give in, you've convinced me.
> On the subject of testing out machine moves, I saw a company a while back
> that was selling 'special' foam to use for testing. All they were doing was
> filling plastic beakers or cups with builders polyurethane foam, letting it
> set and then breaking off the beaker. They were charging many times the
> value of the foam and people were buying them!!
>
> Ian
> --
> Ian W. Wright
> Sheffield UK
> www.iw63.freeserve.co.uk
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jon Anderson" <janders@...>
> To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: 09 April 2001 14:41
> Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
>
> > Joe Vicars wrote:
> > >
> > > Just a fr' instance, I'm sure others have other reasons.
> >
> > Well, as a former hobby jeweler, I can add a couple.
> > The wax patterns require details not machinable.
> > The wax patterns are assembled to each other or a larger piece,
> > creating something not machinable. (by anything less than a full 5 axis
> > machine anyway)
> > Wax patterns machine a LOT faster than any metal and are easier on
> > tooling.
> >
> > And there's probably still more reasons...<G>
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the
> discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.
> >
> > Addresses:
> > Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> > Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
> > Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
> > URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> > bill,
> > List Manager
> >
> > FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
> Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.
>
> Addresses:
> Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
> URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> bill,
> List Manager
>
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Discussion Thread
William Reidsema
2001-04-08 03:25:30 UTC
Machineable wax problem
jvicars@c...
2001-04-08 07:36:24 UTC
Re: Machineable wax problem
Larry Goldberg
2001-04-08 08:05:53 UTC
Re: Machineable wax problem
Marcus & Eva
2001-04-08 08:11:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
dougrasmussen@c...
2001-04-08 08:47:37 UTC
Re: Machineable wax problem
Bill Darby
2001-04-08 09:17:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Jon Anderson
2001-04-08 10:14:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Jon Anderson
2001-04-08 10:17:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
wanliker@a...
2001-04-08 10:28:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Machineable wax problem
JanRwl@A...
2001-04-08 13:46:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
jesse
2001-04-08 13:49:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Jeff Demand
2001-04-08 14:39:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Marcus & Eva
2001-04-08 18:54:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Jerry Kimberlin
2001-04-08 19:02:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
jvicars@c...
2001-04-08 19:25:06 UTC
Re: Machineable wax problem
Jerry Kimberlin
2001-04-08 19:47:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Machineable wax problem
jesse
2001-04-08 20:44:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Machineable wax problem
Smoke
2001-04-08 20:52:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Ian Wright
2001-04-09 05:10:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Joe Vicars
2001-04-09 06:24:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Jon Anderson
2001-04-09 06:42:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Marcus & Eva
2001-04-09 07:16:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Sven Peter, TAD S.A.
2001-04-09 07:42:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Jon Elson
2001-04-09 11:36:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Ian Wright
2001-04-09 11:55:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Andrew Werby
2001-04-09 12:48:17 UTC
Machineable wax problem
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-04-09 12:50:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
stratton@m...
2001-04-09 12:57:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
jesse
2001-04-09 13:25:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Dennis Cranston
2001-04-09 13:40:31 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Ian Wright
2001-04-09 14:57:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
R. T. Robbins
2001-04-09 20:08:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
jesse
2001-04-09 21:16:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
jesse
2001-04-09 21:21:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
alenz@c...
2001-04-09 22:41:11 UTC
Re: Machineable wax problem