CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem

Posted by jesse
on 2001-04-09 21:21:17 UTC
The urethane burning comment was just a warning to be careful out there.
There are materials that are a lot easier to investment cast than machine. For high value short runs or prototyping machining
multiple wax patterns may be the least evil.
Jesse

Ian Wright wrote:

> Ok, I give in, you've convinced me.
> On the subject of testing out machine moves, I saw a company a while back
> that was selling 'special' foam to use for testing. All they were doing was
> filling plastic beakers or cups with builders polyurethane foam, letting it
> set and then breaking off the beaker. They were charging many times the
> value of the foam and people were buying them!!
>
> Ian
> --
> Ian W. Wright
> Sheffield UK
> www.iw63.freeserve.co.uk
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jon Anderson" <janders@...>
> To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: 09 April 2001 14:41
> Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
>
> > Joe Vicars wrote:
> > >
> > > Just a fr' instance, I'm sure others have other reasons.
> >
> > Well, as a former hobby jeweler, I can add a couple.
> > The wax patterns require details not machinable.
> > The wax patterns are assembled to each other or a larger piece,
> > creating something not machinable. (by anything less than a full 5 axis
> > machine anyway)
> > Wax patterns machine a LOT faster than any metal and are easier on
> > tooling.
> >
> > And there's probably still more reasons...<G>
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the
> discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.
> >
> > Addresses:
> > Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> > Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
> > Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
> > URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> > bill,
> > List Manager
> >
> > FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
> Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.
>
> Addresses:
> Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
> URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> bill,
> List Manager
>
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Discussion Thread

William Reidsema 2001-04-08 03:25:30 UTC Machineable wax problem jvicars@c... 2001-04-08 07:36:24 UTC Re: Machineable wax problem Larry Goldberg 2001-04-08 08:05:53 UTC Re: Machineable wax problem Marcus & Eva 2001-04-08 08:11:55 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem dougrasmussen@c... 2001-04-08 08:47:37 UTC Re: Machineable wax problem Bill Darby 2001-04-08 09:17:27 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem Jon Anderson 2001-04-08 10:14:28 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem Jon Anderson 2001-04-08 10:17:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem wanliker@a... 2001-04-08 10:28:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Machineable wax problem JanRwl@A... 2001-04-08 13:46:20 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem jesse 2001-04-08 13:49:36 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem Jeff Demand 2001-04-08 14:39:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem Marcus & Eva 2001-04-08 18:54:53 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem Jerry Kimberlin 2001-04-08 19:02:24 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem jvicars@c... 2001-04-08 19:25:06 UTC Re: Machineable wax problem Jerry Kimberlin 2001-04-08 19:47:41 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Machineable wax problem jesse 2001-04-08 20:44:32 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Machineable wax problem Smoke 2001-04-08 20:52:57 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem Ian Wright 2001-04-09 05:10:02 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem Joe Vicars 2001-04-09 06:24:31 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem Jon Anderson 2001-04-09 06:42:16 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem Marcus & Eva 2001-04-09 07:16:58 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem Sven Peter, TAD S.A. 2001-04-09 07:42:49 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem Jon Elson 2001-04-09 11:36:44 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem Ian Wright 2001-04-09 11:55:48 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem Andrew Werby 2001-04-09 12:48:17 UTC Machineable wax problem Alan Marconett KM6VV 2001-04-09 12:50:00 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem stratton@m... 2001-04-09 12:57:17 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem jesse 2001-04-09 13:25:26 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem Dennis Cranston 2001-04-09 13:40:31 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem Ian Wright 2001-04-09 14:57:55 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem R. T. Robbins 2001-04-09 20:08:52 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem jesse 2001-04-09 21:16:46 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem jesse 2001-04-09 21:21:17 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem alenz@c... 2001-04-09 22:41:11 UTC Re: Machineable wax problem