Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Machineable wax problem
Posted by
jesse
on 2001-04-08 20:44:32 UTC
"Non Toxic" in the case of acrylic would only mean that the ultimate products of combustion are water and CO2. Burn out is not
totally a combustion process. First the material melts and breaks down some of it gets burned the rest boils out into the
atmosphere as organic volatiles. Residual carbon from the breakdown burns out to CO2 at the upper temperatures as enough oxygen
gets in to burn it. A well ventilated area is a good idea toxic or not.
Jesse
Jerry Kimberlin wrote:
totally a combustion process. First the material melts and breaks down some of it gets burned the rest boils out into the
atmosphere as organic volatiles. Residual carbon from the breakdown burns out to CO2 at the upper temperatures as enough oxygen
gets in to burn it. A well ventilated area is a good idea toxic or not.
Jesse
Jerry Kimberlin wrote:
> jvicars@... wrote:
> >
> > Odor has nothing to do with toxicity. If you guys are trying out new
> > materials for burning out then spend a few minutes and pick up the
> > MSDS. You guys mentioned Delrin. Delrin releases formaldyhyde when
> > burned.
>
> MSDS doesn't mean a thing since they are written by the maker of
> the product. I have contributed to MSDS work and know that the
> stuff in there about toxicity can be misleading to casual readers
> who don't know much about the jargon.
>
> No, odor doesn't necessarily indicate toxicity, but to say that
> it has nothing to do with it is a bit cavalier. Out of the
> Formaldyhyde is toxic. Don't breathe its vapors. Most burning
> plastics are toxic. We had a local fire at a plastics recycler
> some weeks ago that send a couple thousand people to the
> hospital. Some of the people were actually genuine, others went
> to establish a precident for a law suit.
>
> JerryK
>
> Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.
>
> Addresses:
> Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
> URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> bill,
> List Manager
>
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Discussion Thread
William Reidsema
2001-04-08 03:25:30 UTC
Machineable wax problem
jvicars@c...
2001-04-08 07:36:24 UTC
Re: Machineable wax problem
Larry Goldberg
2001-04-08 08:05:53 UTC
Re: Machineable wax problem
Marcus & Eva
2001-04-08 08:11:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
dougrasmussen@c...
2001-04-08 08:47:37 UTC
Re: Machineable wax problem
Bill Darby
2001-04-08 09:17:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Jon Anderson
2001-04-08 10:14:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Jon Anderson
2001-04-08 10:17:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
wanliker@a...
2001-04-08 10:28:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Machineable wax problem
JanRwl@A...
2001-04-08 13:46:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
jesse
2001-04-08 13:49:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Jeff Demand
2001-04-08 14:39:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Marcus & Eva
2001-04-08 18:54:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Jerry Kimberlin
2001-04-08 19:02:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
jvicars@c...
2001-04-08 19:25:06 UTC
Re: Machineable wax problem
Jerry Kimberlin
2001-04-08 19:47:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Machineable wax problem
jesse
2001-04-08 20:44:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Machineable wax problem
Smoke
2001-04-08 20:52:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Ian Wright
2001-04-09 05:10:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Joe Vicars
2001-04-09 06:24:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Jon Anderson
2001-04-09 06:42:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Marcus & Eva
2001-04-09 07:16:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Sven Peter, TAD S.A.
2001-04-09 07:42:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Jon Elson
2001-04-09 11:36:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Ian Wright
2001-04-09 11:55:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Andrew Werby
2001-04-09 12:48:17 UTC
Machineable wax problem
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-04-09 12:50:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
stratton@m...
2001-04-09 12:57:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
jesse
2001-04-09 13:25:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Dennis Cranston
2001-04-09 13:40:31 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
Ian Wright
2001-04-09 14:57:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
R. T. Robbins
2001-04-09 20:08:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
jesse
2001-04-09 21:16:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
jesse
2001-04-09 21:21:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machineable wax problem
alenz@c...
2001-04-09 22:41:11 UTC
Re: Machineable wax problem