Whither goest DOS?
Posted by
Carol & Jerry Jankura
on 2002-01-23 09:19:20 UTC
Marcus:
This reply is a little long winded, but I hope it helps you and others set
their Win based machines so they have the option to boot either Windows or
Plain DOS. The newer the version of Windows, the less "real DOS" you'll
encounter. My understanding of the situation is:
1. Anything built with NT as a kernel (Win 2000, Win XP, etc.) does not have
DOS, plain and simple. Every "DOS" program runs under an emulator.
2. Anything else from MicroSoft still has the "tried and true" DOS as a
base. Each "later" version of Windows 3.1->95->98->98SE->98ME makes it more
difficult to boot a plain DOS system, even though DOS is there.
3. With Windows 95, 98, 98SE (don't have 98ME, don't particularly want it)
you may edit both MSDOS.SYS and CONFIG.SYS to build a dual boot system - one
that boots either into a DOS only environment or one that boots into a
Windows environment.
4. Edit the MSDOS.SYS as follows:
[Options]
AutoScan=0 No ScanDISK if you simply turn the machine off
BootMulti=1 Allow multiple operating environments
BootGUI=0 Boot into DOS first
DoubleBuffer=1
LOGO=0 Don't display bitmap while booting.
5. One way to edit CONFIG.SYS is:
[Menu]
MenuItem=4DOS, MS-DOS 7.1 + 4DOS CLI
MenuItem=NORMAL, MS-DOS 7.1 + COMMAND CLI with EMM386 Driver
MenuItem=WIN98, Windows GUI
MenuItem=CD, MS-DOS 7.1 with CD Support
MenuItem=NOTHING, MS-DOS 7.1 Unadorned
MenuDefault=Win98, 10 <== Line sets default, set to 4DOS or NORMAL for
DOS
MenuColor 11, 1
[Common]
DOS=HIGH,UMB
Device=C:\Windows\HiMem.SYS /TestMem:OFF
[4DOS]
SHELL=C:\4DOS-700\4DOS.COM C:\4DOS-700 /E:3072 /P
Device=C:\Windows\EMM386.EXE NOEMS RAM HIGHSCAN
DeviceHigh=C:\Windows\Command\ANSI.SYS
rem Device=C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM\mouse.drv
[Normal]
Shell=C:\COMMAND.COM C:\ /E:3072 /P
Device=C:\Windows\EMM386.EXE NOEMS RAM HIGHSCAN
DeviceHigh=C:\Windows\Command\ANSI.SYS
[WIN98]
SHELL=C:\4DOS-700\4DOS.COM C:\4DOS-700 /E:3072 /P
Device=C:\Windows\EMM386.EXE NOEMS RAM HIGHSCAN
DeviceHigh=C:\Windows\Command\ANSI.SYS
[CD]
SHELL=C:\4DOS-700\4DOS.COM C:\4DOS-700 /E:3072 /P
Device=C:\Windows\EMM386.EXE NOEMS RAM HIGHSCAN
DeviceHigh=\sys\oakcdrom.sys /D:MSCD001
DeviceHigh=C:\Windows\Command\ANSI.SYS
[NOTHING]
SHELL=C:\4DOS-700\4DOS.COM C:\4DOS-700 /E:3072 /P
DeviceHIgh=C:\Windows\Command\ANSI.SYS
[Common]
Set OS=WIN98
Files=50
Note that I prefer to use 4DOS from JPSoftware as a command line interpreter
rather than Command.COM. I also prefer to have a means of booting into a
real mode environment without EMM386.EXE when I want to do some debug.
6. Set AutoEXEC to look something like:
CLS
IFF "%CONFIG%"=="WIN98" THEN
ECHO %COMPUTER% \\ MicroSoft Win-98 Release %VER%
ECHO Loading Windows '98 GUI, Please Wait
VERIFY OFF
C:\WINDOWS\WIN.COM
ENDIFF
IFF "%CONFIG%"=="%NORMAL%" THEN
ECHO %COMPUTER% \\MicroSoft Win-98 Release %VER%
ECHO MS Command Line Interface
ENDIFF
IFF "%CONFIG%"=="4DOS" THEN
ECHO %COMPUTER% \\ MicroSoft Win-98 Release %VER%
ECHO 4DOS Command Line Interface
VERIFY OFF
ENDIFF
Note that this code is for the 4DOS command interpreter, which allows for
if-then-else and if-endif blocks. You'll have to modify it to work properly
under Command.COM, but you get the idea of how it can work.
If you boot into the command line, simply type "Windows\WIN<EnterKey> to
start Windows.
I hope this helps.
-- Carol & Jerry Jankura
Strongsville, Ohio
So many toys, so little time....
|-----Original Message-----
|From: Marcus & Eva [mailto:implmex@...]
|Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 9:27 AM
|To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
|Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Whither goest DOS?
|
|
|Hi all:
| I was under the impression that the later versions of Windoze offered
|only an approximation of DOS when accessed as "MSDOS" from the main screen.
|I was also told that if you boot directly to DOS by editing your MSDOSsys
|file, you will get a clean version that will perform as DOS should.
|Have I been mis-led??
|It seems to be OK for my DOSSHELL application (DX32 Bridgeport control),
but
|if I try to run from "MSDOS" I get a screenful of Chinese noodles!!
|Cheers
This reply is a little long winded, but I hope it helps you and others set
their Win based machines so they have the option to boot either Windows or
Plain DOS. The newer the version of Windows, the less "real DOS" you'll
encounter. My understanding of the situation is:
1. Anything built with NT as a kernel (Win 2000, Win XP, etc.) does not have
DOS, plain and simple. Every "DOS" program runs under an emulator.
2. Anything else from MicroSoft still has the "tried and true" DOS as a
base. Each "later" version of Windows 3.1->95->98->98SE->98ME makes it more
difficult to boot a plain DOS system, even though DOS is there.
3. With Windows 95, 98, 98SE (don't have 98ME, don't particularly want it)
you may edit both MSDOS.SYS and CONFIG.SYS to build a dual boot system - one
that boots either into a DOS only environment or one that boots into a
Windows environment.
4. Edit the MSDOS.SYS as follows:
[Options]
AutoScan=0 No ScanDISK if you simply turn the machine off
BootMulti=1 Allow multiple operating environments
BootGUI=0 Boot into DOS first
DoubleBuffer=1
LOGO=0 Don't display bitmap while booting.
5. One way to edit CONFIG.SYS is:
[Menu]
MenuItem=4DOS, MS-DOS 7.1 + 4DOS CLI
MenuItem=NORMAL, MS-DOS 7.1 + COMMAND CLI with EMM386 Driver
MenuItem=WIN98, Windows GUI
MenuItem=CD, MS-DOS 7.1 with CD Support
MenuItem=NOTHING, MS-DOS 7.1 Unadorned
MenuDefault=Win98, 10 <== Line sets default, set to 4DOS or NORMAL for
DOS
MenuColor 11, 1
[Common]
DOS=HIGH,UMB
Device=C:\Windows\HiMem.SYS /TestMem:OFF
[4DOS]
SHELL=C:\4DOS-700\4DOS.COM C:\4DOS-700 /E:3072 /P
Device=C:\Windows\EMM386.EXE NOEMS RAM HIGHSCAN
DeviceHigh=C:\Windows\Command\ANSI.SYS
rem Device=C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM\mouse.drv
[Normal]
Shell=C:\COMMAND.COM C:\ /E:3072 /P
Device=C:\Windows\EMM386.EXE NOEMS RAM HIGHSCAN
DeviceHigh=C:\Windows\Command\ANSI.SYS
[WIN98]
SHELL=C:\4DOS-700\4DOS.COM C:\4DOS-700 /E:3072 /P
Device=C:\Windows\EMM386.EXE NOEMS RAM HIGHSCAN
DeviceHigh=C:\Windows\Command\ANSI.SYS
[CD]
SHELL=C:\4DOS-700\4DOS.COM C:\4DOS-700 /E:3072 /P
Device=C:\Windows\EMM386.EXE NOEMS RAM HIGHSCAN
DeviceHigh=\sys\oakcdrom.sys /D:MSCD001
DeviceHigh=C:\Windows\Command\ANSI.SYS
[NOTHING]
SHELL=C:\4DOS-700\4DOS.COM C:\4DOS-700 /E:3072 /P
DeviceHIgh=C:\Windows\Command\ANSI.SYS
[Common]
Set OS=WIN98
Files=50
Note that I prefer to use 4DOS from JPSoftware as a command line interpreter
rather than Command.COM. I also prefer to have a means of booting into a
real mode environment without EMM386.EXE when I want to do some debug.
6. Set AutoEXEC to look something like:
CLS
IFF "%CONFIG%"=="WIN98" THEN
ECHO %COMPUTER% \\ MicroSoft Win-98 Release %VER%
ECHO Loading Windows '98 GUI, Please Wait
VERIFY OFF
C:\WINDOWS\WIN.COM
ENDIFF
IFF "%CONFIG%"=="%NORMAL%" THEN
ECHO %COMPUTER% \\MicroSoft Win-98 Release %VER%
ECHO MS Command Line Interface
ENDIFF
IFF "%CONFIG%"=="4DOS" THEN
ECHO %COMPUTER% \\ MicroSoft Win-98 Release %VER%
ECHO 4DOS Command Line Interface
VERIFY OFF
ENDIFF
Note that this code is for the 4DOS command interpreter, which allows for
if-then-else and if-endif blocks. You'll have to modify it to work properly
under Command.COM, but you get the idea of how it can work.
If you boot into the command line, simply type "Windows\WIN<EnterKey> to
start Windows.
I hope this helps.
-- Carol & Jerry Jankura
Strongsville, Ohio
So many toys, so little time....
|-----Original Message-----
|From: Marcus & Eva [mailto:implmex@...]
|Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 9:27 AM
|To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
|Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Whither goest DOS?
|
|
|Hi all:
| I was under the impression that the later versions of Windoze offered
|only an approximation of DOS when accessed as "MSDOS" from the main screen.
|I was also told that if you boot directly to DOS by editing your MSDOSsys
|file, you will get a clean version that will perform as DOS should.
|Have I been mis-led??
|It seems to be OK for my DOSSHELL application (DX32 Bridgeport control),
but
|if I try to run from "MSDOS" I get a screenful of Chinese noodles!!
|Cheers
Discussion Thread
ballendo
2002-01-23 04:42:43 UTC
Whither goest DOS?
Tony Jeffree
2002-01-23 06:31:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Whither goest DOS?
Marcus & Eva
2002-01-23 08:21:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Whither goest DOS?
studleylee
2002-01-23 08:27:58 UTC
Re: Whither goest DOS?
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2002-01-23 08:45:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
David Goodfellow
2002-01-23 08:48:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2002-01-23 09:19:20 UTC
Whither goest DOS?
pfrederick1
2002-01-23 09:50:41 UTC
Re: Whither goest DOS?
Fitch R. Williams
2002-01-23 10:22:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
CL
2002-01-23 10:38:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
CL
2002-01-23 10:47:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
dlantz@a...
2002-01-23 10:51:14 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
Jon Elson
2002-01-23 10:58:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Whither goest DOS?
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2002-01-23 11:02:45 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
Jon Elson
2002-01-23 11:14:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
Drew Rogge
2002-01-23 11:17:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
Kevin P. Martin
2002-01-23 11:21:51 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
ccstratton
2002-01-23 11:50:52 UTC
Re: Whither goest DOS?
Tim
2002-01-23 14:19:22 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
ccs@m...
2002-01-23 14:31:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
Hugh Currin
2002-01-23 14:37:02 UTC
Re: Whither goest DOS?
Smoke
2002-01-23 15:28:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
Ray
2002-01-23 15:38:38 UTC
Re: Re: Re: Whither goest DOS?
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2002-01-23 15:41:07 UTC
DOS is dead; long live DOS :-)
Chris L
2002-01-23 15:42:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Whither goest DOS?
Russell Shaw
2002-01-23 16:03:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
wanliker@a...
2002-01-23 17:21:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
Bill Vance
2002-01-23 17:59:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
pfrederick1
2002-01-23 18:10:01 UTC
Re: Whither goest DOS?
Russell Shaw
2002-01-23 18:30:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
Mr. sausage
2002-01-23 20:16:28 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
waynegramlich
2002-01-23 20:53:03 UTC
Open source CNC buffer [Was: Whither goest DOS?]
ballendo
2002-01-23 20:56:09 UTC
Re: Whither goest DOS?
Chris L
2002-01-23 21:22:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
ballendo
2002-01-23 21:35:17 UTC
Re: Whither goest DOS?
Bill Vance
2002-01-23 21:40:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2002-01-23 21:48:13 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
ccs@m...
2002-01-23 22:00:11 UTC
Re: USB or Ethernet machine control
Jon Elson
2002-01-23 22:11:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
ballendo
2002-01-23 22:36:41 UTC
Re: Whither goest DOS?
ballendo
2002-01-23 23:02:09 UTC
Re: Re: Whither goest DOS?
ballendo
2002-01-23 23:06:15 UTC
microcontrollers for cnc was Re: Whither goest DOS?
ballendo
2002-01-23 23:18:21 UTC
Re: Whither goest DOS?
ballendo
2002-01-24 00:50:52 UTC
Re: USB or Ethernet machine control
Ian Wright
2002-01-24 02:18:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
pfrederick1
2002-01-24 05:02:06 UTC
Re: Whither goest DOS?
dlantz@a...
2002-01-24 05:22:28 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
pfrederick1
2002-01-24 05:25:09 UTC
Re: Whither goest DOS?
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2002-01-24 05:54:58 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: USB or Ethernet machine control
pfrederick1
2002-01-24 08:11:09 UTC
Re: Whither goest DOS?
JanRwl@A...
2002-01-24 10:22:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: USB or Ethernet machine control
Jon Elson
2002-01-24 10:54:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
CL
2002-01-24 11:02:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
ccs@m...
2002-01-24 11:10:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
CL
2002-01-24 12:11:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
ccs@m...
2002-01-24 12:24:01 UTC
Re: glitchy step signals
wanliker@a...
2002-01-24 12:44:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
Luc Vercruysse
2002-01-24 13:57:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Open source CNC buffer [Was: Whither goest DOS?]
Russell Shaw
2002-01-24 14:48:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2002-01-24 19:05:21 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
ballendo
2002-01-25 00:38:01 UTC
Re: Whither goest DOS?
ballendo
2002-01-25 00:47:16 UTC
Subject headings vs. OT was Re: Whither goest DOS?
ballendo
2002-01-25 02:07:05 UTC
Linux cnc OTHER than EMC was Re: Whither goest DOS?
Ian Wright
2002-01-25 02:41:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
ballendo
2002-01-25 05:55:18 UTC
Re: Whither goest DOS?
Dennis Dunn
2002-01-25 06:31:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
Russell Shaw
2002-01-25 06:39:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
ballendo
2002-01-25 07:04:06 UTC
fpga's for b-box was Re: Whither goest DOS?
ballendo
2002-01-25 07:10:06 UTC
Re: Whither goest DOS?
Dennis Dunn
2002-01-25 07:37:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
CL
2002-01-25 11:18:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
ballendo
2002-01-25 12:29:51 UTC
windows controllers master5 was Re: Whither goest DOS?
ballendo
2002-01-25 12:43:33 UTC
Re: Whither goest DOS?
dkowalcz2000
2002-01-25 13:09:00 UTC
Re: USB or Ethernet machine control
ballendo
2002-01-25 13:21:02 UTC
Black boxes was Re: USB or Ethernet machine control
j.guenther
2002-01-25 13:45:47 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
Paul
2002-01-25 17:24:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Black boxes
Russell Shaw
2002-01-25 17:38:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
Jon Elson
2002-01-25 22:24:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Black boxes was Re: USB or Ethernet machine control
Jon Elson
2002-01-25 22:42:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Black boxes
ballendo
2002-01-27 04:50:03 UTC
"gutting" black boxes was Re: Whither goest DOS?
ballendo
2002-01-27 05:20:55 UTC
All those in favor of simple interfaces, say "I" was Re: Whither goest DOS?
ballendo
2002-01-27 06:41:41 UTC
Re: Black boxes
ballendo
2002-01-27 18:33:01 UTC
master 5 group for computer info was Re: Whither goest DOS?
Chris L
2002-01-27 18:48:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] master 5 group for computer info was Re: Whither goest DOS?
Raymond Heckert
2002-01-27 21:09:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Black boxes
Tony Jeffree
2002-01-27 22:15:52 UTC
Re: Patent searches (was Black boxes)
Scot Rogers
2002-01-27 22:58:49 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
ballendo
2002-01-28 05:09:36 UTC
Us Govt. patent site was Re: Black boxes
Tony Jeffree
2002-01-28 05:24:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Us Govt. patent site was Re: Black boxes
ballendo
2002-01-28 05:50:11 UTC
Us Govt. patent site was Re: Black boxes
Tony Jeffree
2002-01-28 07:03:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Us Govt. patent site was Re: Black boxes
ron ginger
2002-01-28 18:39:05 UTC
Black boxes
wanliker@a...
2002-01-28 18:48:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Black boxes
ballendo
2002-01-29 02:19:50 UTC
Re: Black boxes
Fitch R. Williams
2002-01-29 04:40:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Black boxes