Re: Whither goest DOS?
Posted by
ballendo
on 2002-01-23 21:35:17 UTC
Jerry,
Hey! Yahoo gave some "downstream" posts to the thread. I do
read "ahead" when they're available; otherwise it's strictly
sequential, which I'll be going back to now :-(
Thank you. This is useful info.
So do you (or any other list members) have an opinion about the
viability of offering a DOS based controller to home hobbiest
cnc'ers? and I'm asking for thoughts of viability "beyond" our group
members here (who would likely just put dos on a box if that's what
it took<G>).
Put another way, how long do you think a dos based controller could
be successfully offered "out there" in the real world beyond CCED?
Thank you in advance.
Ballendo
P.S. I'm hoping answers to this will let me see beyond MY small slice
of what *I think* is happening out there in the cnc world... Towards
what is REALLY happening...
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "Carol & Jerry Jankura"
<jerry.jankura@s...> wrote:
Hey! Yahoo gave some "downstream" posts to the thread. I do
read "ahead" when they're available; otherwise it's strictly
sequential, which I'll be going back to now :-(
Thank you. This is useful info.
So do you (or any other list members) have an opinion about the
viability of offering a DOS based controller to home hobbiest
cnc'ers? and I'm asking for thoughts of viability "beyond" our group
members here (who would likely just put dos on a box if that's what
it took<G>).
Put another way, how long do you think a dos based controller could
be successfully offered "out there" in the real world beyond CCED?
Thank you in advance.
Ballendo
P.S. I'm hoping answers to this will let me see beyond MY small slice
of what *I think* is happening out there in the cnc world... Towards
what is REALLY happening...
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "Carol & Jerry Jankura"
<jerry.jankura@s...> wrote:
> Marcus:others set
>
> This reply is a little long winded, but I hope it helps you and
> their Win based machines so they have the option to boot eitherWindows or
> Plain DOS. The newer the version of Windows, the less "real DOS"you'll
> encounter. My understanding of the situation is:not have
>
> 1. Anything built with NT as a kernel (Win 2000, Win XP, etc.) does
> DOS, plain and simple. Every "DOS" program runs under an emulator.as a
>
> 2. Anything else from MicroSoft still has the "tried and true" DOS
> base. Each "later" version of Windows 3.1->95->98->98SE->98ME makesit more
> difficult to boot a plain DOS system, even though DOS is there.want it)
>
> 3. With Windows 95, 98, 98SE (don't have 98ME, don't particularly
> you may edit both MSDOS.SYS and CONFIG.SYS to build a dual bootsystem - one
> that boots either into a DOS only environment or one that bootsinto a
> Windows environment.default, set to 4DOS or NORMAL for
>
> 4. Edit the MSDOS.SYS as follows:
>
> [Options]
> AutoScan=0 No ScanDISK if you simply turn the machine off
> BootMulti=1 Allow multiple operating environments
> BootGUI=0 Boot into DOS first
> DoubleBuffer=1
> LOGO=0 Don't display bitmap while booting.
>
> 5. One way to edit CONFIG.SYS is:
>
> [Menu]
> MenuItem=4DOS, MS-DOS 7.1 + 4DOS CLI
> MenuItem=NORMAL, MS-DOS 7.1 + COMMAND CLI with EMM386 Driver
> MenuItem=WIN98, Windows GUI
> MenuItem=CD, MS-DOS 7.1 with CD Support
> MenuItem=NOTHING, MS-DOS 7.1 Unadorned
> MenuDefault=Win98, 10 <== Line sets
> DOSinterpreter
> MenuColor 11, 1
>
> [Common]
> DOS=HIGH,UMB
> Device=C:\Windows\HiMem.SYS /TestMem:OFF
>
> [4DOS]
> SHELL=C:\4DOS-700\4DOS.COM C:\4DOS-700 /E:3072 /P
> Device=C:\Windows\EMM386.EXE NOEMS RAM HIGHSCAN
> DeviceHigh=C:\Windows\Command\ANSI.SYS
> rem Device=C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM\mouse.drv
>
> [Normal]
> Shell=C:\COMMAND.COM C:\ /E:3072 /P
> Device=C:\Windows\EMM386.EXE NOEMS RAM HIGHSCAN
> DeviceHigh=C:\Windows\Command\ANSI.SYS
>
> [WIN98]
> SHELL=C:\4DOS-700\4DOS.COM C:\4DOS-700 /E:3072 /P
> Device=C:\Windows\EMM386.EXE NOEMS RAM HIGHSCAN
> DeviceHigh=C:\Windows\Command\ANSI.SYS
>
> [CD]
> SHELL=C:\4DOS-700\4DOS.COM C:\4DOS-700 /E:3072 /P
> Device=C:\Windows\EMM386.EXE NOEMS RAM HIGHSCAN
> DeviceHigh=\sys\oakcdrom.sys /D:MSCD001
> DeviceHigh=C:\Windows\Command\ANSI.SYS
>
> [NOTHING]
> SHELL=C:\4DOS-700\4DOS.COM C:\4DOS-700 /E:3072 /P
> DeviceHIgh=C:\Windows\Command\ANSI.SYS
>
> [Common]
> Set OS=WIN98
> Files=50
>
> Note that I prefer to use 4DOS from JPSoftware as a command line
> rather than Command.COM. I also prefer to have a means of bootinginto a
> real mode environment without EMM386.EXE when I want to do somedebug.
>allows for
> 6. Set AutoEXEC to look something like:
>
> CLS
> IFF "%CONFIG%"=="WIN98" THEN
> ECHO %COMPUTER% \\ MicroSoft Win-98 Release %VER%
> ECHO Loading Windows '98 GUI, Please Wait
> VERIFY OFF
> C:\WINDOWS\WIN.COM
> ENDIFF
> IFF "%CONFIG%"=="%NORMAL%" THEN
> ECHO %COMPUTER% \\MicroSoft Win-98 Release %VER%
> ECHO MS Command Line Interface
> ENDIFF
> IFF "%CONFIG%"=="4DOS" THEN
> ECHO %COMPUTER% \\ MicroSoft Win-98 Release %VER%
> ECHO 4DOS Command Line Interface
> VERIFY OFF
> ENDIFF
>
> Note that this code is for the 4DOS command interpreter, which
> if-then-else and if-endif blocks. You'll have to modify it to workproperly
> under Command.COM, but you get the idea of how it can work.type "Windows\WIN<EnterKey> to
>
> If you boot into the command line, simply
> start Windows.offered
>
> I hope this helps.
>
> -- Carol & Jerry Jankura
> Strongsville, Ohio
> So many toys, so little time....
>
>
> |-----Original Message-----
> |From: Marcus & Eva [mailto:implmex@a...]
> |Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 9:27 AM
> |To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y...
> |Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Whither goest DOS?
> |
> |
> |Hi all:
> | I was under the impression that the later versions of Windoze
> |only an approximation of DOS when accessed as "MSDOS" from themain screen.
> |I was also told that if you boot directly to DOS by editing yourMSDOSsys
> |file, you will get a clean version that will perform as DOS should.control),
> |Have I been mis-led??
> |It seems to be OK for my DOSSHELL application (DX32 Bridgeport
> but
> |if I try to run from "MSDOS" I get a screenful of Chinese noodles!!
> |Cheers
Discussion Thread
ballendo
2002-01-23 04:42:43 UTC
Whither goest DOS?
Tony Jeffree
2002-01-23 06:31:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Whither goest DOS?
Marcus & Eva
2002-01-23 08:21:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Whither goest DOS?
studleylee
2002-01-23 08:27:58 UTC
Re: Whither goest DOS?
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2002-01-23 08:45:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
David Goodfellow
2002-01-23 08:48:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2002-01-23 09:19:20 UTC
Whither goest DOS?
pfrederick1
2002-01-23 09:50:41 UTC
Re: Whither goest DOS?
Fitch R. Williams
2002-01-23 10:22:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
CL
2002-01-23 10:38:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
CL
2002-01-23 10:47:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
dlantz@a...
2002-01-23 10:51:14 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
Jon Elson
2002-01-23 10:58:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Whither goest DOS?
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2002-01-23 11:02:45 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
Jon Elson
2002-01-23 11:14:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
Drew Rogge
2002-01-23 11:17:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
Kevin P. Martin
2002-01-23 11:21:51 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
ccstratton
2002-01-23 11:50:52 UTC
Re: Whither goest DOS?
Tim
2002-01-23 14:19:22 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
ccs@m...
2002-01-23 14:31:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
Hugh Currin
2002-01-23 14:37:02 UTC
Re: Whither goest DOS?
Smoke
2002-01-23 15:28:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
Ray
2002-01-23 15:38:38 UTC
Re: Re: Re: Whither goest DOS?
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2002-01-23 15:41:07 UTC
DOS is dead; long live DOS :-)
Chris L
2002-01-23 15:42:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Whither goest DOS?
Russell Shaw
2002-01-23 16:03:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
wanliker@a...
2002-01-23 17:21:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
Bill Vance
2002-01-23 17:59:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
pfrederick1
2002-01-23 18:10:01 UTC
Re: Whither goest DOS?
Russell Shaw
2002-01-23 18:30:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
Mr. sausage
2002-01-23 20:16:28 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
waynegramlich
2002-01-23 20:53:03 UTC
Open source CNC buffer [Was: Whither goest DOS?]
ballendo
2002-01-23 20:56:09 UTC
Re: Whither goest DOS?
Chris L
2002-01-23 21:22:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
ballendo
2002-01-23 21:35:17 UTC
Re: Whither goest DOS?
Bill Vance
2002-01-23 21:40:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2002-01-23 21:48:13 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
ccs@m...
2002-01-23 22:00:11 UTC
Re: USB or Ethernet machine control
Jon Elson
2002-01-23 22:11:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
ballendo
2002-01-23 22:36:41 UTC
Re: Whither goest DOS?
ballendo
2002-01-23 23:02:09 UTC
Re: Re: Whither goest DOS?
ballendo
2002-01-23 23:06:15 UTC
microcontrollers for cnc was Re: Whither goest DOS?
ballendo
2002-01-23 23:18:21 UTC
Re: Whither goest DOS?
ballendo
2002-01-24 00:50:52 UTC
Re: USB or Ethernet machine control
Ian Wright
2002-01-24 02:18:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
pfrederick1
2002-01-24 05:02:06 UTC
Re: Whither goest DOS?
dlantz@a...
2002-01-24 05:22:28 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
pfrederick1
2002-01-24 05:25:09 UTC
Re: Whither goest DOS?
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2002-01-24 05:54:58 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: USB or Ethernet machine control
pfrederick1
2002-01-24 08:11:09 UTC
Re: Whither goest DOS?
JanRwl@A...
2002-01-24 10:22:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: USB or Ethernet machine control
Jon Elson
2002-01-24 10:54:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
CL
2002-01-24 11:02:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
ccs@m...
2002-01-24 11:10:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
CL
2002-01-24 12:11:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
ccs@m...
2002-01-24 12:24:01 UTC
Re: glitchy step signals
wanliker@a...
2002-01-24 12:44:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
Luc Vercruysse
2002-01-24 13:57:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Open source CNC buffer [Was: Whither goest DOS?]
Russell Shaw
2002-01-24 14:48:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2002-01-24 19:05:21 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
ballendo
2002-01-25 00:38:01 UTC
Re: Whither goest DOS?
ballendo
2002-01-25 00:47:16 UTC
Subject headings vs. OT was Re: Whither goest DOS?
ballendo
2002-01-25 02:07:05 UTC
Linux cnc OTHER than EMC was Re: Whither goest DOS?
Ian Wright
2002-01-25 02:41:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
ballendo
2002-01-25 05:55:18 UTC
Re: Whither goest DOS?
Dennis Dunn
2002-01-25 06:31:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
Russell Shaw
2002-01-25 06:39:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
ballendo
2002-01-25 07:04:06 UTC
fpga's for b-box was Re: Whither goest DOS?
ballendo
2002-01-25 07:10:06 UTC
Re: Whither goest DOS?
Dennis Dunn
2002-01-25 07:37:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
CL
2002-01-25 11:18:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
ballendo
2002-01-25 12:29:51 UTC
windows controllers master5 was Re: Whither goest DOS?
ballendo
2002-01-25 12:43:33 UTC
Re: Whither goest DOS?
dkowalcz2000
2002-01-25 13:09:00 UTC
Re: USB or Ethernet machine control
ballendo
2002-01-25 13:21:02 UTC
Black boxes was Re: USB or Ethernet machine control
j.guenther
2002-01-25 13:45:47 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
Paul
2002-01-25 17:24:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Black boxes
Russell Shaw
2002-01-25 17:38:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
Jon Elson
2002-01-25 22:24:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Black boxes was Re: USB or Ethernet machine control
Jon Elson
2002-01-25 22:42:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Black boxes
ballendo
2002-01-27 04:50:03 UTC
"gutting" black boxes was Re: Whither goest DOS?
ballendo
2002-01-27 05:20:55 UTC
All those in favor of simple interfaces, say "I" was Re: Whither goest DOS?
ballendo
2002-01-27 06:41:41 UTC
Re: Black boxes
ballendo
2002-01-27 18:33:01 UTC
master 5 group for computer info was Re: Whither goest DOS?
Chris L
2002-01-27 18:48:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] master 5 group for computer info was Re: Whither goest DOS?
Raymond Heckert
2002-01-27 21:09:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Black boxes
Tony Jeffree
2002-01-27 22:15:52 UTC
Re: Patent searches (was Black boxes)
Scot Rogers
2002-01-27 22:58:49 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?
ballendo
2002-01-28 05:09:36 UTC
Us Govt. patent site was Re: Black boxes
Tony Jeffree
2002-01-28 05:24:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Us Govt. patent site was Re: Black boxes
ballendo
2002-01-28 05:50:11 UTC
Us Govt. patent site was Re: Black boxes
Tony Jeffree
2002-01-28 07:03:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Us Govt. patent site was Re: Black boxes
ron ginger
2002-01-28 18:39:05 UTC
Black boxes
wanliker@a...
2002-01-28 18:48:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Black boxes
ballendo
2002-01-29 02:19:50 UTC
Re: Black boxes
Fitch R. Williams
2002-01-29 04:40:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Black boxes