CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS?

Posted by CL
on 2002-01-25 11:18:26 UTC
ballendo wrote:

Look at flashcut, and you can see this. That is why you keep telling us that
when "they get there new 32 bit version out..." Will this require you to buy
a new hardware box?

Nope, not at first. You will need to swap a chip in the Black Box (in a dip
socket).

A new chip has already been tested and approved for use with the 16 bit
version. I posted my results a while back. This new chip in the existing box
will operate with the 32 bit version of software. As a side note, many have
found that swapping out the black box's on board opto's to transistors also
improves reliability depending on what drives you have.

The 32 bit Software is all new from ground up. The Base of this program will
then allow for another future release. THAT release, will be an entirely new
technique.

> As long as I'm software-only based, I can run as long as the s/w
> platform is available. And I'll bet that 20 years from now an old pc
> will be easier to find than an old (replacement) flashcut box! (for
> when mine wears out/breaks) And flashcut may not even be around, or
> may not feel like supporting that "old" control box. Anyone in cnc
> has seen this in machines from bridgeport to Camtech. Before anybody
> says the software may not be supported either, keep in mind that a
> hardware failure prevents me from working. Lack of software support
> in the future, after I have been using it for awhile (let's keep the
> apples with apples, and oranges with oranges) only means I can't do
> NEW things...

Very applicable points ! Things happen, Ideas and techniques are improved.
Eventually any hardware based answer will go by the wayside if it breaks.


> 2) Well, I can. Master5 runs very smoothly for me, and OpenCNC
> (whichis expensive, but still based on windows and s/w only) is just
> like dedicated controls in its operation. The ABILITY is there; only
> the price will need to come down, which WILL happen as others
> continue to discover how to do it with windows in s/w only.

Do you care to indicate what components (brands and model numbers) you have
in that computer ?
It might help those who want to try out Master5. I want to try it, But I
would like to build a comp. It will for certain run on right away, rather
than experiment or modify what I have laying around.

Chris L

Discussion Thread

ballendo 2002-01-23 04:42:43 UTC Whither goest DOS? Tony Jeffree 2002-01-23 06:31:07 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Whither goest DOS? Marcus & Eva 2002-01-23 08:21:41 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Whither goest DOS? studleylee 2002-01-23 08:27:58 UTC Re: Whither goest DOS? Randy Gordon-Gilmore 2002-01-23 08:45:28 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? David Goodfellow 2002-01-23 08:48:19 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? Carol & Jerry Jankura 2002-01-23 09:19:20 UTC Whither goest DOS? pfrederick1 2002-01-23 09:50:41 UTC Re: Whither goest DOS? Fitch R. Williams 2002-01-23 10:22:41 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? CL 2002-01-23 10:38:32 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? CL 2002-01-23 10:47:29 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? dlantz@a... 2002-01-23 10:51:14 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? Jon Elson 2002-01-23 10:58:07 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Whither goest DOS? Carol & Jerry Jankura 2002-01-23 11:02:45 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? Jon Elson 2002-01-23 11:14:20 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? Drew Rogge 2002-01-23 11:17:00 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? Kevin P. Martin 2002-01-23 11:21:51 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? ccstratton 2002-01-23 11:50:52 UTC Re: Whither goest DOS? Tim 2002-01-23 14:19:22 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? ccs@m... 2002-01-23 14:31:16 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? Hugh Currin 2002-01-23 14:37:02 UTC Re: Whither goest DOS? Smoke 2002-01-23 15:28:08 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? Ray 2002-01-23 15:38:38 UTC Re: Re: Re: Whither goest DOS? Randy Gordon-Gilmore 2002-01-23 15:41:07 UTC DOS is dead; long live DOS :-) Chris L 2002-01-23 15:42:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Whither goest DOS? Russell Shaw 2002-01-23 16:03:25 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? wanliker@a... 2002-01-23 17:21:13 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? Bill Vance 2002-01-23 17:59:53 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? pfrederick1 2002-01-23 18:10:01 UTC Re: Whither goest DOS? Russell Shaw 2002-01-23 18:30:49 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? Mr. sausage 2002-01-23 20:16:28 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? waynegramlich 2002-01-23 20:53:03 UTC Open source CNC buffer [Was: Whither goest DOS?] ballendo 2002-01-23 20:56:09 UTC Re: Whither goest DOS? Chris L 2002-01-23 21:22:04 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? ballendo 2002-01-23 21:35:17 UTC Re: Whither goest DOS? Bill Vance 2002-01-23 21:40:43 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? Carol & Jerry Jankura 2002-01-23 21:48:13 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? ccs@m... 2002-01-23 22:00:11 UTC Re: USB or Ethernet machine control Jon Elson 2002-01-23 22:11:30 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? ballendo 2002-01-23 22:36:41 UTC Re: Whither goest DOS? ballendo 2002-01-23 23:02:09 UTC Re: Re: Whither goest DOS? ballendo 2002-01-23 23:06:15 UTC microcontrollers for cnc was Re: Whither goest DOS? ballendo 2002-01-23 23:18:21 UTC Re: Whither goest DOS? ballendo 2002-01-24 00:50:52 UTC Re: USB or Ethernet machine control Ian Wright 2002-01-24 02:18:35 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? pfrederick1 2002-01-24 05:02:06 UTC Re: Whither goest DOS? dlantz@a... 2002-01-24 05:22:28 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? pfrederick1 2002-01-24 05:25:09 UTC Re: Whither goest DOS? Carol & Jerry Jankura 2002-01-24 05:54:58 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: USB or Ethernet machine control pfrederick1 2002-01-24 08:11:09 UTC Re: Whither goest DOS? JanRwl@A... 2002-01-24 10:22:41 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: USB or Ethernet machine control Jon Elson 2002-01-24 10:54:27 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? CL 2002-01-24 11:02:25 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? ccs@m... 2002-01-24 11:10:34 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? CL 2002-01-24 12:11:09 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? ccs@m... 2002-01-24 12:24:01 UTC Re: glitchy step signals wanliker@a... 2002-01-24 12:44:21 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? Luc Vercruysse 2002-01-24 13:57:00 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Open source CNC buffer [Was: Whither goest DOS?] Russell Shaw 2002-01-24 14:48:07 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? Carol & Jerry Jankura 2002-01-24 19:05:21 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? ballendo 2002-01-25 00:38:01 UTC Re: Whither goest DOS? ballendo 2002-01-25 00:47:16 UTC Subject headings vs. OT was Re: Whither goest DOS? ballendo 2002-01-25 02:07:05 UTC Linux cnc OTHER than EMC was Re: Whither goest DOS? Ian Wright 2002-01-25 02:41:16 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? ballendo 2002-01-25 05:55:18 UTC Re: Whither goest DOS? Dennis Dunn 2002-01-25 06:31:26 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? Russell Shaw 2002-01-25 06:39:34 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? ballendo 2002-01-25 07:04:06 UTC fpga's for b-box was Re: Whither goest DOS? ballendo 2002-01-25 07:10:06 UTC Re: Whither goest DOS? Dennis Dunn 2002-01-25 07:37:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? CL 2002-01-25 11:18:26 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? ballendo 2002-01-25 12:29:51 UTC windows controllers master5 was Re: Whither goest DOS? ballendo 2002-01-25 12:43:33 UTC Re: Whither goest DOS? dkowalcz2000 2002-01-25 13:09:00 UTC Re: USB or Ethernet machine control ballendo 2002-01-25 13:21:02 UTC Black boxes was Re: USB or Ethernet machine control j.guenther 2002-01-25 13:45:47 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? Paul 2002-01-25 17:24:31 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Black boxes Russell Shaw 2002-01-25 17:38:28 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? Jon Elson 2002-01-25 22:24:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Black boxes was Re: USB or Ethernet machine control Jon Elson 2002-01-25 22:42:11 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Black boxes ballendo 2002-01-27 04:50:03 UTC "gutting" black boxes was Re: Whither goest DOS? ballendo 2002-01-27 05:20:55 UTC All those in favor of simple interfaces, say "I" was Re: Whither goest DOS? ballendo 2002-01-27 06:41:41 UTC Re: Black boxes ballendo 2002-01-27 18:33:01 UTC master 5 group for computer info was Re: Whither goest DOS? Chris L 2002-01-27 18:48:57 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] master 5 group for computer info was Re: Whither goest DOS? Raymond Heckert 2002-01-27 21:09:36 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Black boxes Tony Jeffree 2002-01-27 22:15:52 UTC Re: Patent searches (was Black boxes) Scot Rogers 2002-01-27 22:58:49 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Whither goest DOS? ballendo 2002-01-28 05:09:36 UTC Us Govt. patent site was Re: Black boxes Tony Jeffree 2002-01-28 05:24:30 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Us Govt. patent site was Re: Black boxes ballendo 2002-01-28 05:50:11 UTC Us Govt. patent site was Re: Black boxes Tony Jeffree 2002-01-28 07:03:07 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Us Govt. patent site was Re: Black boxes ron ginger 2002-01-28 18:39:05 UTC Black boxes wanliker@a... 2002-01-28 18:48:09 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Black boxes ballendo 2002-01-29 02:19:50 UTC Re: Black boxes Fitch R. Williams 2002-01-29 04:40:14 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Black boxes