CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2

Posted by Jon Elson
on 2002-04-09 10:36:24 UTC
mariss92705 wrote:

> Jon,
>
> I appreciate your thougtful comments. I would hate to be the poor
> bastard that designed the HIP4080. Probably the most miserable half-
> bridge driver ever built. Probably looking for a job now somewhere.

Well, they push it as a class-D audio power amp, to run from 12 - 15 V
power supplies. It does pretty well at that. The design isn't so bad,
it was what the marketing folks claimed it was good for that was the
problem! Specsmanship is one thing, but this chip has specs that
are bald-faced lies!

> About IGBTs. You have to keep in mind what they are; essentialy a
> Darlignton transistor that uses a MOSFET as the "low current"
> Darlington driver into a bipolar pass transistor.
>
> Where they fit into the scheme of things is for circuits that operate
> at voltages above 440VDC. The advantage goes to bipolar transistors
> in that range due to their lower Vsat versus Rds for MOSFETs. Below
> those rarified voltages MOSFETs rule. Simply their losses are lower.

Using the largest FET die that you can get, mosfets can "rule". But, these
huge chunks of silicon cost a bundle! For your 80 V max drives, I think
you are right, mosfets are best. When you start talking about 160 V
drives, it is not so clear. You need to put 250 V (absolute minimum)
fets in a 160 V drive, and I think 400 V would be safer. Here, you start
to see where the IGBT starts to lead. It may not actually save POWER,
but it may be able to match the FETs on power, with a die HALF the
area! That will save money.

> Four layer boards versus two layer boards. Printed circuit board
> price matrices primarily are based on square inches of board size.
> The number of holes, the number of different hole sizes and to a
> great degree the number of layers are irrelevant. What matters is the
> size of the board.
>
> If you make a big board, it will be expensive; if you design a small
> board, it will be cheap. That's all there is to it. 4 layers or 2, it
> makes no difference.

Once you go past 2 layers, they have to laminate, so it is a jump to a
different process. With the off-shore prices you showed, it really doesn't
matter. I generally pay $100 per board, even ** 2 layer ** in the
quantities I do stuff in! I just got some 6 layer boards back, about
$240 each. But, I only ordered 10 pieces. You design things for MUCH
larger batches.

>
> The market that addresses the 440V range multi-HP motor drives is
> very small relative to sub 200V drives. That market requires IGBT
> devices. MOSFETs are the more efficient choice in the lattter.
>
> I have designed 440V IGBT dives on a contract baisis for major drive
> manufacturers. IGBTs are slow, lossy but rugged. They are not
> economical below 440V, not 100V.

OK, well, I've stated my point, and you've stated yours. I'm still not
convinced that they are only viable above 440 V in all cases.

Jon

Discussion Thread

Steve Blackmore 2002-03-27 16:57:25 UTC Chopper circuit pfrederick1 2002-03-28 05:41:01 UTC Re: Chopper circuit Vajk Fekete 2002-03-28 06:19:45 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Chopper circuit stephen_stallings 2002-03-28 12:05:30 UTC Re: Chopper circuit pfrederick1 2002-03-28 12:25:46 UTC Re: Chopper circuit Tony Jeffree 2002-03-28 13:46:18 UTC Re: Chopper circuit Steve Blackmore 2002-03-28 20:38:28 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Chopper circuit RichD. 2002-03-28 21:12:41 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Chopper circuit Steve Blackmore 2002-03-29 03:34:08 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Chopper circuit Steve Blackmore 2002-04-02 12:07:07 UTC Chopper circuit waynegramlich 2002-04-02 20:02:49 UTC Re: Chopper circuit Steve Blackmore 2002-04-03 11:16:21 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Chopper circuit paul_alz 2002-04-03 15:46:51 UTC Re: Chopper circuit andrewyslee 2002-04-03 15:54:29 UTC safety Chris L 2002-04-03 16:28:58 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] safety waynegramlich 2002-04-03 16:36:57 UTC Re: Chopper circuit waynegramlich 2002-04-03 16:41:50 UTC Re: Chopper circuit JanRwl@A... 2002-04-03 16:46:35 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] safety andrewyslee 2002-04-03 17:45:36 UTC Re: safety JanRwl@A... 2002-04-03 18:31:59 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety mariss92705 2002-04-03 19:01:55 UTC Re: Chopper circuit Raymond Heckert 2002-04-03 23:16:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] safety waynegramlich 2002-04-04 09:37:54 UTC L298 Commutation Diodes (was Re: Chopper circuit) paul_alz 2002-04-04 15:55:03 UTC Re: Chopper circuit mariss92705 2002-04-04 16:51:05 UTC L298 Commutation Diodes (was Re: Chopper circuit) Raymond Heckert 2002-04-04 19:35:10 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Chopper circuit dave_ace_me 2002-04-04 19:50:29 UTC Re: Chopper circuit dave_ace_me 2002-04-04 19:55:25 UTC OT irfranview ( was Re: Chopper circuit waynegramlich 2002-04-04 21:18:39 UTC Re: Chopper circuit waynegramlich 2002-04-04 21:36:16 UTC L298 Commutation Diodes (was Re: Chopper circuit) paul_alz 2002-04-04 23:49:13 UTC Re: Chopper circuit dave_ace_me 2002-04-05 05:39:10 UTC Re: Chopper circuit paul_alz 2002-04-06 01:04:04 UTC Re: Chopper circuit ballendo 2002-04-06 06:47:08 UTC Re: Chopper circuit JanRwl@A... 2002-04-06 13:21:47 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Chopper circuit mariss92705 2002-04-06 14:06:59 UTC Re: Chopper circuit Steve Blackmore 2002-04-06 16:50:32 UTC [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 paul_alz 2002-04-07 03:19:03 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Steve Blackmore 2002-04-07 05:00:04 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 paul_alz 2002-04-07 09:47:58 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 n4onl 2002-04-07 10:20:22 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 paul_alz 2002-04-07 12:31:11 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Larry Edington 2002-04-07 13:26:08 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 n4onl 2002-04-07 15:53:03 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 waynegramlich 2002-04-07 17:21:57 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Steve Blackmore 2002-04-07 18:05:36 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 mariss92705 2002-04-07 18:07:59 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Tim Goldstein 2002-04-07 19:04:37 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 mariss92705 2002-04-07 19:43:07 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 mariss92705 2002-04-07 20:00:17 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 RichD 2002-04-07 20:08:58 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 marble here 2002-04-07 20:40:37 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Tim Goldstein 2002-04-07 20:54:18 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 marble here 2002-04-07 21:05:47 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 marble here 2002-04-07 21:09:10 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Jon Elson 2002-04-07 22:13:44 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Doug Fortune 2002-04-07 22:33:53 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Paul Weber 2002-04-07 23:28:57 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Tony Jeffree 2002-04-07 23:42:39 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Steve Blackmore 2002-04-08 00:45:16 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 mariss92705 2002-04-08 00:49:48 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 mariss92705 2002-04-08 01:01:35 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 paul_alz 2002-04-08 01:13:38 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Steve Blackmore 2002-04-08 01:17:45 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 paul_alz 2002-04-08 02:05:30 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Tony Jeffree 2002-04-08 02:14:33 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 paul_alz 2002-04-08 02:29:31 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 paul_alz 2002-04-08 02:40:50 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Paul R. Hvidston 2002-04-08 07:41:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 cadcamcenter 2002-04-08 08:40:22 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 mariss92705 2002-04-08 21:37:12 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Jon Elson 2002-04-08 21:57:48 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Larry Edington 2002-04-08 22:17:11 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Larry Edington 2002-04-08 22:28:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Larry Edington 2002-04-08 22:36:50 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 RichD 2002-04-08 22:51:44 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 mariss92705 2002-04-09 00:08:36 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 paul_alz 2002-04-09 01:01:27 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Jon Elson 2002-04-09 10:14:11 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Jon Elson 2002-04-09 10:36:24 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 mariss92705 2002-04-09 11:54:39 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Jon Elson 2002-04-09 22:44:20 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Steve Blackmore 2002-04-10 04:01:07 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Ver 3.2 Web page up ballendo 2002-04-13 05:31:51 UTC Re: safety andrewyslee 2002-04-13 16:01:35 UTC Re: safety wanliker@a... 2002-04-13 23:27:38 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety ballendo 2002-04-14 01:06:45 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 ballendo 2002-04-14 03:44:04 UTC pcb sources was Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 dave_ace_me 2002-04-14 06:31:41 UTC pcb sources was Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 JanRwl@A... 2002-04-14 16:51:19 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety andrewyslee 2002-04-14 17:52:15 UTC safety - pcb dust hazard mariss92705 2002-04-14 18:06:00 UTC Re: safety - pcb dust hazard mariss92705 2002-04-14 18:10:08 UTC Re: safety andrewyslee 2002-04-14 18:39:49 UTC Re: safety - pcb dust hazard Sven Peter 2002-04-14 18:53:27 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] safety - pcb dust hazard marble_h 2002-04-14 19:27:38 UTC Re: safety - pcb dust hazard J.Critchfield 2002-04-14 20:09:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety - pcb dust hazard JanRwl@A... 2002-04-15 00:01:23 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety JanRwl@A... 2002-04-15 00:05:02 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety dave_ace_me 2002-04-15 04:05:04 UTC Re: safety - pcb dust hazard andrewyslee 2002-04-15 17:45:42 UTC Re: safety - pcb dust hazard andrewyslee 2002-04-15 18:17:13 UTC Re: safety - pcb dust hazard ballendo 2002-04-16 13:58:59 UTC Re: safety - pcb dust hazard Raymond Heckert 2002-04-16 16:01:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety ballendo 2002-04-16 16:44:40 UTC Re: safety - pcb dust hazard ballendo 2002-04-17 01:23:05 UTC What to do in an estop ?!? was Re: safety mariss92705 2002-04-17 03:03:29 UTC Re: safety Sven Peter 2002-04-17 06:49:42 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety mariss92705 2002-04-17 07:23:55 UTC Re: safety - pcb dust hazard dave_ace_me 2002-04-17 10:02:12 UTC Re: safety - pcb dust hazard mariss92705 2002-04-17 10:53:38 UTC Re: safety - pcb dust hazard dave_ace_me 2002-04-17 20:07:33 UTC Re: safety - pcb dust hazard askforum 2002-04-17 20:07:55 UTC Re: safety - pcb dust hazard JanRwl@A... 2002-04-17 20:30:05 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety mariss92705 2002-04-17 22:23:42 UTC Re: safety - pcb dust hazard Ward 2002-04-18 01:14:10 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety - pcb dust hazard batwings@i... 2002-04-18 04:30:08 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety - pcb dust hazard dave_ace_me 2002-04-18 04:57:56 UTC Re: safety - pcb dust hazard steveggca 2002-04-18 05:00:12 UTC What to do in an estop ?!? was Re: safety Jon Elson 2002-04-18 05:42:20 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety Raymond Heckert 2002-04-18 09:51:38 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] What to do in an estop ?!? was Re: safety Jon Elson 2002-04-18 10:59:03 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] What to do in an estop ?!? was Re: safety mariss92705 2002-04-18 11:45:34 UTC Re: safety Jon Elson 2002-04-18 23:06:48 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety Hugh Prescott 2002-04-19 01:28:37 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety - pcb dust hazard ballendo 2002-04-19 06:16:34 UTC OT Re: safety - pcb dust hazard