Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2002-04-09 10:36:24 UTC
mariss92705 wrote:
power supplies. It does pretty well at that. The design isn't so bad,
it was what the marketing folks claimed it was good for that was the
problem! Specsmanship is one thing, but this chip has specs that
are bald-faced lies!
huge chunks of silicon cost a bundle! For your 80 V max drives, I think
you are right, mosfets are best. When you start talking about 160 V
drives, it is not so clear. You need to put 250 V (absolute minimum)
fets in a 160 V drive, and I think 400 V would be safer. Here, you start
to see where the IGBT starts to lead. It may not actually save POWER,
but it may be able to match the FETs on power, with a die HALF the
area! That will save money.
different process. With the off-shore prices you showed, it really doesn't
matter. I generally pay $100 per board, even ** 2 layer ** in the
quantities I do stuff in! I just got some 6 layer boards back, about
$240 each. But, I only ordered 10 pieces. You design things for MUCH
larger batches.
convinced that they are only viable above 440 V in all cases.
Jon
> Jon,Well, they push it as a class-D audio power amp, to run from 12 - 15 V
>
> I appreciate your thougtful comments. I would hate to be the poor
> bastard that designed the HIP4080. Probably the most miserable half-
> bridge driver ever built. Probably looking for a job now somewhere.
power supplies. It does pretty well at that. The design isn't so bad,
it was what the marketing folks claimed it was good for that was the
problem! Specsmanship is one thing, but this chip has specs that
are bald-faced lies!
> About IGBTs. You have to keep in mind what they are; essentialy aUsing the largest FET die that you can get, mosfets can "rule". But, these
> Darlignton transistor that uses a MOSFET as the "low current"
> Darlington driver into a bipolar pass transistor.
>
> Where they fit into the scheme of things is for circuits that operate
> at voltages above 440VDC. The advantage goes to bipolar transistors
> in that range due to their lower Vsat versus Rds for MOSFETs. Below
> those rarified voltages MOSFETs rule. Simply their losses are lower.
huge chunks of silicon cost a bundle! For your 80 V max drives, I think
you are right, mosfets are best. When you start talking about 160 V
drives, it is not so clear. You need to put 250 V (absolute minimum)
fets in a 160 V drive, and I think 400 V would be safer. Here, you start
to see where the IGBT starts to lead. It may not actually save POWER,
but it may be able to match the FETs on power, with a die HALF the
area! That will save money.
> Four layer boards versus two layer boards. Printed circuit boardOnce you go past 2 layers, they have to laminate, so it is a jump to a
> price matrices primarily are based on square inches of board size.
> The number of holes, the number of different hole sizes and to a
> great degree the number of layers are irrelevant. What matters is the
> size of the board.
>
> If you make a big board, it will be expensive; if you design a small
> board, it will be cheap. That's all there is to it. 4 layers or 2, it
> makes no difference.
different process. With the off-shore prices you showed, it really doesn't
matter. I generally pay $100 per board, even ** 2 layer ** in the
quantities I do stuff in! I just got some 6 layer boards back, about
$240 each. But, I only ordered 10 pieces. You design things for MUCH
larger batches.
>OK, well, I've stated my point, and you've stated yours. I'm still not
> The market that addresses the 440V range multi-HP motor drives is
> very small relative to sub 200V drives. That market requires IGBT
> devices. MOSFETs are the more efficient choice in the lattter.
>
> I have designed 440V IGBT dives on a contract baisis for major drive
> manufacturers. IGBTs are slow, lossy but rugged. They are not
> economical below 440V, not 100V.
convinced that they are only viable above 440 V in all cases.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Steve Blackmore
2002-03-27 16:57:25 UTC
Chopper circuit
pfrederick1
2002-03-28 05:41:01 UTC
Re: Chopper circuit
Vajk Fekete
2002-03-28 06:19:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Chopper circuit
stephen_stallings
2002-03-28 12:05:30 UTC
Re: Chopper circuit
pfrederick1
2002-03-28 12:25:46 UTC
Re: Chopper circuit
Tony Jeffree
2002-03-28 13:46:18 UTC
Re: Chopper circuit
Steve Blackmore
2002-03-28 20:38:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Chopper circuit
RichD.
2002-03-28 21:12:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Chopper circuit
Steve Blackmore
2002-03-29 03:34:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Chopper circuit
Steve Blackmore
2002-04-02 12:07:07 UTC
Chopper circuit
waynegramlich
2002-04-02 20:02:49 UTC
Re: Chopper circuit
Steve Blackmore
2002-04-03 11:16:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Chopper circuit
paul_alz
2002-04-03 15:46:51 UTC
Re: Chopper circuit
andrewyslee
2002-04-03 15:54:29 UTC
safety
Chris L
2002-04-03 16:28:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] safety
waynegramlich
2002-04-03 16:36:57 UTC
Re: Chopper circuit
waynegramlich
2002-04-03 16:41:50 UTC
Re: Chopper circuit
JanRwl@A...
2002-04-03 16:46:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] safety
andrewyslee
2002-04-03 17:45:36 UTC
Re: safety
JanRwl@A...
2002-04-03 18:31:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety
mariss92705
2002-04-03 19:01:55 UTC
Re: Chopper circuit
Raymond Heckert
2002-04-03 23:16:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] safety
waynegramlich
2002-04-04 09:37:54 UTC
L298 Commutation Diodes (was Re: Chopper circuit)
paul_alz
2002-04-04 15:55:03 UTC
Re: Chopper circuit
mariss92705
2002-04-04 16:51:05 UTC
L298 Commutation Diodes (was Re: Chopper circuit)
Raymond Heckert
2002-04-04 19:35:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Chopper circuit
dave_ace_me
2002-04-04 19:50:29 UTC
Re: Chopper circuit
dave_ace_me
2002-04-04 19:55:25 UTC
OT irfranview ( was Re: Chopper circuit
waynegramlich
2002-04-04 21:18:39 UTC
Re: Chopper circuit
waynegramlich
2002-04-04 21:36:16 UTC
L298 Commutation Diodes (was Re: Chopper circuit)
paul_alz
2002-04-04 23:49:13 UTC
Re: Chopper circuit
dave_ace_me
2002-04-05 05:39:10 UTC
Re: Chopper circuit
paul_alz
2002-04-06 01:04:04 UTC
Re: Chopper circuit
ballendo
2002-04-06 06:47:08 UTC
Re: Chopper circuit
JanRwl@A...
2002-04-06 13:21:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Chopper circuit
mariss92705
2002-04-06 14:06:59 UTC
Re: Chopper circuit
Steve Blackmore
2002-04-06 16:50:32 UTC
[CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
paul_alz
2002-04-07 03:19:03 UTC
Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
Steve Blackmore
2002-04-07 05:00:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
paul_alz
2002-04-07 09:47:58 UTC
Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
n4onl
2002-04-07 10:20:22 UTC
Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
paul_alz
2002-04-07 12:31:11 UTC
Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
Larry Edington
2002-04-07 13:26:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
n4onl
2002-04-07 15:53:03 UTC
Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
waynegramlich
2002-04-07 17:21:57 UTC
Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
Steve Blackmore
2002-04-07 18:05:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
mariss92705
2002-04-07 18:07:59 UTC
Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
Tim Goldstein
2002-04-07 19:04:37 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
mariss92705
2002-04-07 19:43:07 UTC
Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
mariss92705
2002-04-07 20:00:17 UTC
Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
RichD
2002-04-07 20:08:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
marble here
2002-04-07 20:40:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
Tim Goldstein
2002-04-07 20:54:18 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
marble here
2002-04-07 21:05:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
marble here
2002-04-07 21:09:10 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
Jon Elson
2002-04-07 22:13:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
Doug Fortune
2002-04-07 22:33:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
Paul Weber
2002-04-07 23:28:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
Tony Jeffree
2002-04-07 23:42:39 UTC
Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
Steve Blackmore
2002-04-08 00:45:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
mariss92705
2002-04-08 00:49:48 UTC
Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
mariss92705
2002-04-08 01:01:35 UTC
Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
paul_alz
2002-04-08 01:13:38 UTC
Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
Steve Blackmore
2002-04-08 01:17:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
paul_alz
2002-04-08 02:05:30 UTC
Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
Tony Jeffree
2002-04-08 02:14:33 UTC
Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
paul_alz
2002-04-08 02:29:31 UTC
Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
paul_alz
2002-04-08 02:40:50 UTC
Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
Paul R. Hvidston
2002-04-08 07:41:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
cadcamcenter
2002-04-08 08:40:22 UTC
Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
mariss92705
2002-04-08 21:37:12 UTC
Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
Jon Elson
2002-04-08 21:57:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
Larry Edington
2002-04-08 22:17:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
Larry Edington
2002-04-08 22:28:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
Larry Edington
2002-04-08 22:36:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
RichD
2002-04-08 22:51:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
mariss92705
2002-04-09 00:08:36 UTC
Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
paul_alz
2002-04-09 01:01:27 UTC
Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
Jon Elson
2002-04-09 10:14:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
Jon Elson
2002-04-09 10:36:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
mariss92705
2002-04-09 11:54:39 UTC
Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
Jon Elson
2002-04-09 22:44:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
Steve Blackmore
2002-04-10 04:01:07 UTC
Re: Was Chopper circuit - Ver 3.2 Web page up
ballendo
2002-04-13 05:31:51 UTC
Re: safety
andrewyslee
2002-04-13 16:01:35 UTC
Re: safety
wanliker@a...
2002-04-13 23:27:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety
ballendo
2002-04-14 01:06:45 UTC
Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
ballendo
2002-04-14 03:44:04 UTC
pcb sources was Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
dave_ace_me
2002-04-14 06:31:41 UTC
pcb sources was Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2
JanRwl@A...
2002-04-14 16:51:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety
andrewyslee
2002-04-14 17:52:15 UTC
safety - pcb dust hazard
mariss92705
2002-04-14 18:06:00 UTC
Re: safety - pcb dust hazard
mariss92705
2002-04-14 18:10:08 UTC
Re: safety
andrewyslee
2002-04-14 18:39:49 UTC
Re: safety - pcb dust hazard
Sven Peter
2002-04-14 18:53:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] safety - pcb dust hazard
marble_h
2002-04-14 19:27:38 UTC
Re: safety - pcb dust hazard
J.Critchfield
2002-04-14 20:09:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety - pcb dust hazard
JanRwl@A...
2002-04-15 00:01:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety
JanRwl@A...
2002-04-15 00:05:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety
dave_ace_me
2002-04-15 04:05:04 UTC
Re: safety - pcb dust hazard
andrewyslee
2002-04-15 17:45:42 UTC
Re: safety - pcb dust hazard
andrewyslee
2002-04-15 18:17:13 UTC
Re: safety - pcb dust hazard
ballendo
2002-04-16 13:58:59 UTC
Re: safety - pcb dust hazard
Raymond Heckert
2002-04-16 16:01:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety
ballendo
2002-04-16 16:44:40 UTC
Re: safety - pcb dust hazard
ballendo
2002-04-17 01:23:05 UTC
What to do in an estop ?!? was Re: safety
mariss92705
2002-04-17 03:03:29 UTC
Re: safety
Sven Peter
2002-04-17 06:49:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety
mariss92705
2002-04-17 07:23:55 UTC
Re: safety - pcb dust hazard
dave_ace_me
2002-04-17 10:02:12 UTC
Re: safety - pcb dust hazard
mariss92705
2002-04-17 10:53:38 UTC
Re: safety - pcb dust hazard
dave_ace_me
2002-04-17 20:07:33 UTC
Re: safety - pcb dust hazard
askforum
2002-04-17 20:07:55 UTC
Re: safety - pcb dust hazard
JanRwl@A...
2002-04-17 20:30:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety
mariss92705
2002-04-17 22:23:42 UTC
Re: safety - pcb dust hazard
Ward
2002-04-18 01:14:10 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety - pcb dust hazard
batwings@i...
2002-04-18 04:30:08 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety - pcb dust hazard
dave_ace_me
2002-04-18 04:57:56 UTC
Re: safety - pcb dust hazard
steveggca
2002-04-18 05:00:12 UTC
What to do in an estop ?!? was Re: safety
Jon Elson
2002-04-18 05:42:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety
Raymond Heckert
2002-04-18 09:51:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] What to do in an estop ?!? was Re: safety
Jon Elson
2002-04-18 10:59:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] What to do in an estop ?!? was Re: safety
mariss92705
2002-04-18 11:45:34 UTC
Re: safety
Jon Elson
2002-04-18 23:06:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety
Hugh Prescott
2002-04-19 01:28:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety - pcb dust hazard
ballendo
2002-04-19 06:16:34 UTC
OT Re: safety - pcb dust hazard