CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: safety - pcb dust hazard

Posted by dave_ace_me
on 2002-04-18 04:57:56 UTC
Hi Marriss,

I thought it was a good thread and not tedious.

and I hope you saw the compliement in the comment
about your brain cells. you are one of the
smartest people on this list and I think most
of us read your posts with interest.

now about hydrogen...
seems like machining hydrogen would be a
daunting task, everything under pressure
to get a solid to cut, and if someone
mistakenly opens the door wooosh ! all gone.

we probably will need a new list !


and to let our list mom know, I think this
thread has reached it's conclusion.


Dave




--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "mariss92705" <mariss92705@y...> wrote:
> Dave,
>
> I meant it all in fun. I have pretty much given up on worrying
about
> the catastrophy de jour. Life is way to short and should be enjoyed
> rather than feared. So much of the stuff that is out there sucks
the
> sheer pleasure out of existance, and frankly I feel it makes no
> difference in the long run except to make you fearful. Life is
fuller
> and lusher than that, it is meant to be enjoyed like a beautiful
> woman, with all your senses alive and alert.
>
> I was wrong about aluminum. The metal that is orders of magnitude
> more plentiful on the surface of the earth is hydrogen, primarily
> locked up in water and salts. Most probably people don't realize
> hydrogen is a metal. Hydrogen embrittles steel. It forms a metal
> alloy with it. Hydrogen takes the place of a metal ion in molecules
> like hydrogen nitrate (nitric acid), hydrogen cloride (hydrochloric
> acid), etc. Under sufficient pressure (enourmous by the way), it
> reveals its true nature by becoming metallic in every sense of the
> word. Interstingly Jupiter is metallic hydrogen for two thirds of
its
> radius according to the latest findings.
>
> Mariss
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "dave_ace_me" <davemucha@j...> wrote:
> > Hi Mariss,
> >
> > I guess I did over state that a little. Steel is more common to
us
> > and is not found in nature.
> >
> > Aluminum, as a pure substance is not found in nature as it
readily
> > reacts with both bases and acids. Aluminum salts are pleantiful
as
> > you pointed out, and are in many of the things around us.
> >
> > Aluminum, that atom, Element 13, AL, has 3 electrons in the 3rd
> ring
> > which makes it so reactive, and why it is bound in nature.
> >
> > When we refine it and make pure Aluminum, the outter surface
reacts
> > quickly with oxygen forming a protective coating. when we cut it
> or
> > grind it, then inhale it, it reacts with our body chemistry. dry
> > mouth is one sign of breathing alumunim dust or powder.
> >
> > Aluminum cooking utensils react with many foods and some of the
> > resultant chemical compounds released are toxic. You can find
this
> > data easily on the web.
> >
> > Although not proven to the FDA's level of requirements, aluminum
is
> > considdered one of the major factors in Alzheimers, not that any
of
> > use would remember though.
> >
> > As a general guideline, don't breath insdustrial fumes regarless
of
> > the quantity. Solder off gasses lead and although the effects
may
> > not be seen by you in your life, others with lesser active brain
> > cells may notice the effects more quickly.
> >
> > In my experiance, I get really dry and cracked skin when washing
my
> > hands is any good soap that cuts oils and removes dirt.
> >
> > Live in a bubble ? no
> > open a window when convienient ? certanly. but I think most of
us
> > take some measures when the stuff we work on stinks, is dusty or
in
> > some way annoys us.
> >
> > My earlier post was to illistrate how easy and innexpensive it is
> to
> > add those particulate/odor/dust and chip removal devices in a
> shop.
> > I was amazed at how elaborate people get when venting plasma
> cutting
> > machines. some of those guys spend real money!
> >
> > and just because someone is paranoid, doesn't mean someone isn't
> out
> > to get them !
> >
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "mariss92705" <mariss92705@y...>
wrote:
> > > Dave,
> > >
> > > Actually aluminum is the most common metal available on the
> surface
> > > of the earth. If I'm not mistaken, all clay is composed of
> aluminum
> > > salts and oxides, as are most soils and rocks.
> > >
> > > Mariss
> > >
> > > --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "dave_ace_me" <davemucha@j...>
wrote:
> > > > Hi Andrew,
> > > >
> > > >(snip)
> > > >
> > > > Seems aluminum is the ONLY common metal NOT common in
nature.
> > your
> > > > body uses iron, boron, zinc, copper.. you name it. but not
> > aluminum.
> > > >
> > > > Dave

Discussion Thread

Steve Blackmore 2002-03-27 16:57:25 UTC Chopper circuit pfrederick1 2002-03-28 05:41:01 UTC Re: Chopper circuit Vajk Fekete 2002-03-28 06:19:45 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Chopper circuit stephen_stallings 2002-03-28 12:05:30 UTC Re: Chopper circuit pfrederick1 2002-03-28 12:25:46 UTC Re: Chopper circuit Tony Jeffree 2002-03-28 13:46:18 UTC Re: Chopper circuit Steve Blackmore 2002-03-28 20:38:28 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Chopper circuit RichD. 2002-03-28 21:12:41 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Chopper circuit Steve Blackmore 2002-03-29 03:34:08 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Chopper circuit Steve Blackmore 2002-04-02 12:07:07 UTC Chopper circuit waynegramlich 2002-04-02 20:02:49 UTC Re: Chopper circuit Steve Blackmore 2002-04-03 11:16:21 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Chopper circuit paul_alz 2002-04-03 15:46:51 UTC Re: Chopper circuit andrewyslee 2002-04-03 15:54:29 UTC safety Chris L 2002-04-03 16:28:58 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] safety waynegramlich 2002-04-03 16:36:57 UTC Re: Chopper circuit waynegramlich 2002-04-03 16:41:50 UTC Re: Chopper circuit JanRwl@A... 2002-04-03 16:46:35 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] safety andrewyslee 2002-04-03 17:45:36 UTC Re: safety JanRwl@A... 2002-04-03 18:31:59 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety mariss92705 2002-04-03 19:01:55 UTC Re: Chopper circuit Raymond Heckert 2002-04-03 23:16:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] safety waynegramlich 2002-04-04 09:37:54 UTC L298 Commutation Diodes (was Re: Chopper circuit) paul_alz 2002-04-04 15:55:03 UTC Re: Chopper circuit mariss92705 2002-04-04 16:51:05 UTC L298 Commutation Diodes (was Re: Chopper circuit) Raymond Heckert 2002-04-04 19:35:10 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Chopper circuit dave_ace_me 2002-04-04 19:50:29 UTC Re: Chopper circuit dave_ace_me 2002-04-04 19:55:25 UTC OT irfranview ( was Re: Chopper circuit waynegramlich 2002-04-04 21:18:39 UTC Re: Chopper circuit waynegramlich 2002-04-04 21:36:16 UTC L298 Commutation Diodes (was Re: Chopper circuit) paul_alz 2002-04-04 23:49:13 UTC Re: Chopper circuit dave_ace_me 2002-04-05 05:39:10 UTC Re: Chopper circuit paul_alz 2002-04-06 01:04:04 UTC Re: Chopper circuit ballendo 2002-04-06 06:47:08 UTC Re: Chopper circuit JanRwl@A... 2002-04-06 13:21:47 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Chopper circuit mariss92705 2002-04-06 14:06:59 UTC Re: Chopper circuit Steve Blackmore 2002-04-06 16:50:32 UTC [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 paul_alz 2002-04-07 03:19:03 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Steve Blackmore 2002-04-07 05:00:04 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 paul_alz 2002-04-07 09:47:58 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 n4onl 2002-04-07 10:20:22 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 paul_alz 2002-04-07 12:31:11 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Larry Edington 2002-04-07 13:26:08 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 n4onl 2002-04-07 15:53:03 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 waynegramlich 2002-04-07 17:21:57 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Steve Blackmore 2002-04-07 18:05:36 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 mariss92705 2002-04-07 18:07:59 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Tim Goldstein 2002-04-07 19:04:37 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 mariss92705 2002-04-07 19:43:07 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 mariss92705 2002-04-07 20:00:17 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 RichD 2002-04-07 20:08:58 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 marble here 2002-04-07 20:40:37 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Tim Goldstein 2002-04-07 20:54:18 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 marble here 2002-04-07 21:05:47 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 marble here 2002-04-07 21:09:10 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Jon Elson 2002-04-07 22:13:44 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Doug Fortune 2002-04-07 22:33:53 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Paul Weber 2002-04-07 23:28:57 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Tony Jeffree 2002-04-07 23:42:39 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Steve Blackmore 2002-04-08 00:45:16 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 mariss92705 2002-04-08 00:49:48 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 mariss92705 2002-04-08 01:01:35 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 paul_alz 2002-04-08 01:13:38 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Steve Blackmore 2002-04-08 01:17:45 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 paul_alz 2002-04-08 02:05:30 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Tony Jeffree 2002-04-08 02:14:33 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 paul_alz 2002-04-08 02:29:31 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 paul_alz 2002-04-08 02:40:50 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Paul R. Hvidston 2002-04-08 07:41:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 cadcamcenter 2002-04-08 08:40:22 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 mariss92705 2002-04-08 21:37:12 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Jon Elson 2002-04-08 21:57:48 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Larry Edington 2002-04-08 22:17:11 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Larry Edington 2002-04-08 22:28:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Larry Edington 2002-04-08 22:36:50 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 RichD 2002-04-08 22:51:44 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 mariss92705 2002-04-09 00:08:36 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 paul_alz 2002-04-09 01:01:27 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Jon Elson 2002-04-09 10:14:11 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Jon Elson 2002-04-09 10:36:24 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 mariss92705 2002-04-09 11:54:39 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Jon Elson 2002-04-09 22:44:20 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 Steve Blackmore 2002-04-10 04:01:07 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Ver 3.2 Web page up ballendo 2002-04-13 05:31:51 UTC Re: safety andrewyslee 2002-04-13 16:01:35 UTC Re: safety wanliker@a... 2002-04-13 23:27:38 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety ballendo 2002-04-14 01:06:45 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 ballendo 2002-04-14 03:44:04 UTC pcb sources was Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 dave_ace_me 2002-04-14 06:31:41 UTC pcb sources was Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2 JanRwl@A... 2002-04-14 16:51:19 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety andrewyslee 2002-04-14 17:52:15 UTC safety - pcb dust hazard mariss92705 2002-04-14 18:06:00 UTC Re: safety - pcb dust hazard mariss92705 2002-04-14 18:10:08 UTC Re: safety andrewyslee 2002-04-14 18:39:49 UTC Re: safety - pcb dust hazard Sven Peter 2002-04-14 18:53:27 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] safety - pcb dust hazard marble_h 2002-04-14 19:27:38 UTC Re: safety - pcb dust hazard J.Critchfield 2002-04-14 20:09:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety - pcb dust hazard JanRwl@A... 2002-04-15 00:01:23 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety JanRwl@A... 2002-04-15 00:05:02 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety dave_ace_me 2002-04-15 04:05:04 UTC Re: safety - pcb dust hazard andrewyslee 2002-04-15 17:45:42 UTC Re: safety - pcb dust hazard andrewyslee 2002-04-15 18:17:13 UTC Re: safety - pcb dust hazard ballendo 2002-04-16 13:58:59 UTC Re: safety - pcb dust hazard Raymond Heckert 2002-04-16 16:01:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety ballendo 2002-04-16 16:44:40 UTC Re: safety - pcb dust hazard ballendo 2002-04-17 01:23:05 UTC What to do in an estop ?!? was Re: safety mariss92705 2002-04-17 03:03:29 UTC Re: safety Sven Peter 2002-04-17 06:49:42 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety mariss92705 2002-04-17 07:23:55 UTC Re: safety - pcb dust hazard dave_ace_me 2002-04-17 10:02:12 UTC Re: safety - pcb dust hazard mariss92705 2002-04-17 10:53:38 UTC Re: safety - pcb dust hazard dave_ace_me 2002-04-17 20:07:33 UTC Re: safety - pcb dust hazard askforum 2002-04-17 20:07:55 UTC Re: safety - pcb dust hazard JanRwl@A... 2002-04-17 20:30:05 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety mariss92705 2002-04-17 22:23:42 UTC Re: safety - pcb dust hazard Ward 2002-04-18 01:14:10 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety - pcb dust hazard batwings@i... 2002-04-18 04:30:08 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety - pcb dust hazard dave_ace_me 2002-04-18 04:57:56 UTC Re: safety - pcb dust hazard steveggca 2002-04-18 05:00:12 UTC What to do in an estop ?!? was Re: safety Jon Elson 2002-04-18 05:42:20 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety Raymond Heckert 2002-04-18 09:51:38 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] What to do in an estop ?!? was Re: safety Jon Elson 2002-04-18 10:59:03 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] What to do in an estop ?!? was Re: safety mariss92705 2002-04-18 11:45:34 UTC Re: safety Jon Elson 2002-04-18 23:06:48 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety Hugh Prescott 2002-04-19 01:28:37 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: safety - pcb dust hazard ballendo 2002-04-19 06:16:34 UTC OT Re: safety - pcb dust hazard