Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Encoder Indexer Option
Posted by
Stephen Wille Padnos
on 2005-01-31 12:44:28 UTC
Polaraligned wrote:
have no means of communicating any PID parameters or overshoot
information to the PC.
The Rutxes use a PIC chip to do the PID control loop (and encoder
feedback, I think), whereas the Geckos have a hardware PID loop.
achieve. Mach2 can do 45k pulses per second. If you have a resolution
of 20k steps/inch (assuming direct or 1:1 drive with a 5TPI screw and
4000PPR encoder), then Mach2 will have a maximum traverse rate of about
135 IPM. If you want it to go any faster, then you either need lower
resolution encoders, or a step multiplier. Note that the pulse train
from Mach2 will probably not look too good at the maximum rate (this
isn't unique to Mach2 - it would happen with any PC based software step
generator), so if you do want to have 120+ IPM rapids, then a step
multiplier or an external step generator is pretty much required.
I don't know how their PIC code deals with step multiplication and the
PID loop.
I did notice one other thing about the Rutexes - they require a separate
power supply (17-36 VDC) for the controls, whereas the Geckos power the
control circuitry (and encoder) off the motor supply.
- Steve
>I am also favoring the Rutex because of the tuning software andTheir tuning software can't work with the Geckos, because the Geckos
>the better information available at their website. On the otherhand,
>if tuning is not an issue, there is a lot to be said about the
>Gecko's in light of the fact that the owner of the company will
>talk to you!! Their tuning software may also be usable with the
>Gecko's. I don't know.
>
>
have no means of communicating any PID parameters or overshoot
information to the PC.
The Rutxes use a PIC chip to do the PID control loop (and encoder
feedback, I think), whereas the Geckos have a hardware PID loop.
>I am using 1000 CPR (4000 pulse) encoders and *think* I need the stepMach2 can keep up - it's just a matter of the maximum speed you'll
>multiplying. I don't know if Mach2 can keep up with these encoders.
>I wonder if the fault count is effected by the step multiplying
>setting? I guess an adjustable fault count would be best so that
>your options are open especially if you make changes in the future.
>It's like I said with getting the differential encoders, if it doesn't
>cost you, then why not? An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of
>cure.
>
>Scott
>
>
achieve. Mach2 can do 45k pulses per second. If you have a resolution
of 20k steps/inch (assuming direct or 1:1 drive with a 5TPI screw and
4000PPR encoder), then Mach2 will have a maximum traverse rate of about
135 IPM. If you want it to go any faster, then you either need lower
resolution encoders, or a step multiplier. Note that the pulse train
from Mach2 will probably not look too good at the maximum rate (this
isn't unique to Mach2 - it would happen with any PC based software step
generator), so if you do want to have 120+ IPM rapids, then a step
multiplier or an external step generator is pretty much required.
I don't know how their PIC code deals with step multiplication and the
PID loop.
I did notice one other thing about the Rutexes - they require a separate
power supply (17-36 VDC) for the controls, whereas the Geckos power the
control circuitry (and encoder) off the motor supply.
- Steve
Discussion Thread
braidmeister
2005-01-30 18:38:54 UTC
Encoder Indexer Option
Stephen Wille Padnos
2005-01-30 18:53:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoder Indexer Option
R Rogers
2005-01-30 18:53:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoder Indexer Option
R Rogers
2005-01-30 19:08:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoder Indexer Option
Stephen Wille Padnos
2005-01-30 19:15:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoder Indexer Option
braidmeister
2005-01-30 19:15:59 UTC
Re: Encoder Indexer Option
R Rogers
2005-01-30 19:20:56 UTC
Automobile starter motor as servo??
R Rogers
2005-01-30 19:27:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoder Indexer Option
Luke1027
2005-01-30 19:29:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Automobile starter motor as servo??
R Rogers
2005-01-30 19:30:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Encoder Indexer Option
Luke1027
2005-01-30 19:33:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoder Indexer Option
Stephen Wille Padnos
2005-01-30 19:50:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoder Indexer Option
R Rogers
2005-01-30 19:59:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoder Indexer Option
turbulatordude
2005-01-30 20:20:01 UTC
Re: Encoder Indexer Option --- opening up steppers.......and modfying shafts...
Scott Ellis
2005-01-30 21:33:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Automobile starter motor as servo??
braidmeister
2005-01-30 21:37:44 UTC
Re: Encoder Indexer Option --- opening up steppers.......and modfying shafts...
Jon Elson
2005-01-30 21:48:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Automobile starter motor as servo??
Marv Frankel
2005-01-31 03:21:34 UTC
Re: Encoder Indexer Option --- opening up steppers.......and modfying shafts...
Andy Wander
2005-01-31 04:43:25 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoder Indexer Option
Polaraligned
2005-01-31 04:49:52 UTC
Re: Encoder Indexer Option
turbulatordude
2005-01-31 06:52:59 UTC
Re: Encoder Indexer Option --- opening up steppers.......and modfying shafts...
R Rogers
2005-01-31 07:25:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Automobile starter motor as servo??
braidmeister
2005-01-31 07:30:19 UTC
Re: Encoder Indexer Option
R Rogers
2005-01-31 07:32:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Encoder Indexer Option --- opening up steppers.......and modfying shafts...
Andy Wander
2005-01-31 07:47:49 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Encoder Indexer Option --- opening up steppers.......and modfying shafts...
Polaraligned
2005-01-31 08:23:26 UTC
Re: Encoder Indexer Option
Stephen Wille Padnos
2005-01-31 08:30:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Encoder Indexer Option
Stephen Wille Padnos
2005-01-31 08:31:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Encoder Indexer Option
braidmeister
2005-01-31 08:32:51 UTC
Re: Encoder Indexer Option
braidmeister
2005-01-31 08:42:23 UTC
Re: Encoder Indexer Option
Stephen Wille Padnos
2005-01-31 08:49:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Encoder Indexer Option
John Rouche
2005-01-31 08:51:15 UTC
Re: Encoder Indexer Option
braidmeister
2005-01-31 09:01:09 UTC
Re: Encoder Indexer Option
Polaraligned
2005-01-31 11:04:09 UTC
Re: Encoder Indexer Option
braidmeister
2005-01-31 11:16:08 UTC
Re: Encoder Indexer Option
Polaraligned
2005-01-31 11:36:30 UTC
Re: Encoder Indexer Option
braidmeister
2005-01-31 11:45:53 UTC
Re: Encoder Indexer Option
Stephen Wille Padnos
2005-01-31 12:44:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Encoder Indexer Option
Terrenoire, Adrien L
2005-01-31 13:00:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Encoder Indexer Option
David A. Frantz
2005-01-31 14:10:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Encoder Indexer Option
braidmeister
2005-01-31 14:43:34 UTC
Re: Encoder Indexer Option
cnc_4_me
2005-01-31 17:33:36 UTC
Re: Encoder Indexer Option
braidmeister
2005-01-31 18:07:28 UTC
Re: Encoder Indexer Option
cnc_4_me
2005-01-31 19:10:35 UTC
Re: Encoder Indexer Option
Stephan Kotze
2005-02-01 00:36:14 UTC
Re: Automobile starter motor as servo??
R Rogers
2005-02-01 06:13:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Automobile starter motor as servo??
Jon Elson
2005-02-01 09:59:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Automobile starter motor as servo??
Brian
2005-02-01 16:40:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Automobile starter motor as servo??