Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DeskNC Windows version
Posted by
Art Fenerty
on 2001-04-18 17:16:03 UTC
I must check this out further. 30000 steps/second from linux? Anyone know
how the linux knows to interrupt itseld 30000 times a second. I don't see
how its possible. I can't think of any way to instruct a motherboard to tell
linux to interrupt at that rate, no matter how fast the processor.
Interesting though. But I think that 10 motor turns per inch at 200 pulses
per turn is 2000 pulses per inch. This would make it 180 * 2000 / 60 = 6000
pulses per second in the example given. Encoders do not up the steps per
second. They simply give a higher resolution to the step decision.
My VXD can interrupt at 8192 and then time to the closest 2 nanosecond
granularity to ensure smoothness. Windows can still cause instability, but I
haven't seen this cause any lost steps or problems yet. I have users who
tell me that their speed is up to 3 times what they could get from DeskNC or
KellyCam. But there's no question that windoze will never be ideal.
Certainly ideal enough for a good 50% of home CNC users though. P6 onboard
ASIC's are only on the latest generation of processors, typically at 700MHz
and up.(the ones I've tested anyway).
I have no problem releasing the Controller section of Master5 for people
to write programs for themselves, I just have to get time to document the
OLE call to control the buffers.
Timing is hard to check for smoothness. Actual running is the easiest.
I have had several users report scoping my pulses, and seeing drop-outs ,
yet commenting that the motors were running surprisingly smooth. This is due
to an enertial averaging at the motor. Any stepper seems to have a certain
window of tolerance to irregularities in its pulse stream. Stay within this
window, and no problems seem to occur. I have my pulse engine try to correct
for these irregularities by subtimeing from interrupt to the closest
nanosecond possible with the hardware. Seems to work well, but like I said,
Windoze will never be EMC.
I'd like to hear from anyone actually getting more than 8000 pulses from
linux though.
(My head hurts)
Art
how the linux knows to interrupt itseld 30000 times a second. I don't see
how its possible. I can't think of any way to instruct a motherboard to tell
linux to interrupt at that rate, no matter how fast the processor.
Interesting though. But I think that 10 motor turns per inch at 200 pulses
per turn is 2000 pulses per inch. This would make it 180 * 2000 / 60 = 6000
pulses per second in the example given. Encoders do not up the steps per
second. They simply give a higher resolution to the step decision.
My VXD can interrupt at 8192 and then time to the closest 2 nanosecond
granularity to ensure smoothness. Windows can still cause instability, but I
haven't seen this cause any lost steps or problems yet. I have users who
tell me that their speed is up to 3 times what they could get from DeskNC or
KellyCam. But there's no question that windoze will never be ideal.
Certainly ideal enough for a good 50% of home CNC users though. P6 onboard
ASIC's are only on the latest generation of processors, typically at 700MHz
and up.(the ones I've tested anyway).
I have no problem releasing the Controller section of Master5 for people
to write programs for themselves, I just have to get time to document the
OLE call to control the buffers.
Timing is hard to check for smoothness. Actual running is the easiest.
I have had several users report scoping my pulses, and seeing drop-outs ,
yet commenting that the motors were running surprisingly smooth. This is due
to an enertial averaging at the motor. Any stepper seems to have a certain
window of tolerance to irregularities in its pulse stream. Stay within this
window, and no problems seem to occur. I have my pulse engine try to correct
for these irregularities by subtimeing from interrupt to the closest
nanosecond possible with the hardware. Seems to work well, but like I said,
Windoze will never be EMC.
I'd like to hear from anyone actually getting more than 8000 pulses from
linux though.
(My head hurts)
Art
Discussion Thread
The AntiYuppie
2001-04-16 22:08:51 UTC
FS: X-Y Table
mariss92705@y...
2001-04-17 15:16:20 UTC
Re: FS: X-Y Table
Tim Goldstein
2001-04-17 20:21:14 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: FS: X-Y Table
mariss92705@y...
2001-04-17 21:07:04 UTC
Re: FS: X-Y Table
Tim Goldstein
2001-04-17 21:28:32 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: FS: X-Y Table
Tim Goldstein
2001-04-17 21:55:50 UTC
DeskNC Windows version
Dan Mauch
2001-04-18 06:49:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DeskNC Windows version
Tom Eldredge
2001-04-18 06:59:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DeskNC Windows version
Tim Goldstein
2001-04-18 07:02:30 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DeskNC Windows version
Dan Mauch
2001-04-18 08:05:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DeskNC Windows version
Dan Mauch
2001-04-18 08:07:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DeskNC Windows version
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-04-18 10:23:59 UTC
Re: DeskNC Windows version
Tim Goldstein
2001-04-18 10:42:30 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DeskNC Windows version
afogassa@y...
2001-04-18 10:55:52 UTC
Re: DeskNC Windows version
Tim Goldstein
2001-04-18 11:05:37 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DeskNC Windows version
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-04-18 11:22:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DeskNC Windows version
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-04-18 11:37:16 UTC
Re: DeskNC Windows version
Art Fenerty
2001-04-18 12:25:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DeskNC Windows version
Tim Goldstein
2001-04-18 12:51:18 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DeskNC Windows version
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-04-18 14:50:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DeskNC Windows version
Art Fenerty
2001-04-18 15:09:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DeskNC Windows version
Larry Edington
2001-04-18 15:12:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DeskNC Windows version
Tim Goldstein
2001-04-18 15:35:23 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DeskNC Windows version
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-04-18 15:48:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DeskNC Windows version
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-04-18 16:07:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DeskNC Windows version
Tim Goldstein
2001-04-18 16:20:02 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DeskNC Windows version
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-04-18 16:24:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DeskNC Windows version
Tim Goldstein
2001-04-18 17:00:31 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DeskNC Windows version
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-04-18 17:10:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DeskNC Windows version
Art Fenerty
2001-04-18 17:16:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DeskNC Windows version
Tim Goldstein
2001-04-18 17:37:16 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DeskNC Windows version
Art Fenerty
2001-04-18 17:44:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DeskNC Windows version
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2001-04-18 17:58:45 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DeskNC Windows version
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-04-18 18:26:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DeskNC Windows version
Larry Edington
2001-04-18 18:27:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DeskNC Windows version
Larry Edington
2001-04-18 18:43:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DeskNC Windows version
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-04-18 18:49:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DeskNC Windows version
Tom Murray
2001-04-18 20:54:30 UTC
Re: DeskNC - CNC Pro 3x as fast as EMC???
Ray
2001-04-18 21:36:52 UTC
RE: DeskNC Windows version
Matt Shaver
2001-04-18 23:45:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DeskNC Windows version
kleinbauer@j...
2001-04-19 04:32:39 UTC
Re: DeskNC Windows version
kleinbauer@j...
2001-04-19 05:11:29 UTC
Re: DeskNC - CNC Pro 3x as fast as EMC???
Tom Murray
2001-04-19 06:27:27 UTC
Re: DeskNC - CNC Pro 3x as fast as EMC???
Fred Smith
2001-04-19 06:28:12 UTC
Re: DeskNC - CNC Pro 3x as fast as EMC???
Joe Vicars
2001-04-19 06:36:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DeskNC - CNC Pro 3x as fast as EMC???
Carlos Guillermo
2001-04-19 06:38:10 UTC
OT Re: DeskNC - CNC Pro 3x as fast as EMC???
Joe Vicars
2001-04-19 06:52:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] OT Re: DeskNC - CNC Pro 3x as fast as EMC???
kleinbauer@j...
2001-04-19 07:06:24 UTC
Re: DeskNC - CNC Pro 3x as fast as EMC???
kleinbauer@j...
2001-04-19 07:22:17 UTC
Re: DeskNC - CNC Pro 3x as fast as EMC???
kleinbauer@j...
2001-04-19 07:24:53 UTC
OT Re: DeskNC - CNC Pro 3x as fast as EMC???
stratton@m...
2001-04-19 07:34:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DeskNC - CNC Pro 3x as fast as EMC???
Joe Vicars
2001-04-19 07:39:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] OT Re: DeskNC - CNC Pro 3x as fast as EMC???
kleinbauer@j...
2001-04-19 08:53:30 UTC
Re: DeskNC - CNC Pro 3x as fast as EMC???
kleinbauer@j...
2001-04-19 08:57:21 UTC
OT Re: DeskNC - CNC Pro 3x as fast as EMC???
Tim Goldstein
2001-04-19 08:58:59 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DeskNC - CNC Pro 3x as fast as EMC???
kleinbauer@j...
2001-04-19 09:30:14 UTC
Re: DeskNC - CNC Pro 3x as fast as EMC???
Art Fenerty
2001-04-19 10:38:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DeskNC - CNC Pro 3x as fast as EMC???
Paul
2001-04-19 12:32:30 UTC
All quiet on the EMC front ???
Jon Elson
2001-04-19 13:11:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DeskNC Windows version
Jon Elson
2001-04-19 13:18:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DeskNC Windows version
Tim Goldstein
2001-04-19 13:44:38 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DeskNC - CNC Pro 3x as fast as EMC???
Doug Harrison
2001-04-19 14:26:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DeskNC Windows version
beer@s...
2001-04-19 15:19:34 UTC
Re: DeskNC Windows version
IMService
2001-04-19 15:21:30 UTC
Re: All quiet on the EMC front ???
wanliker@a...
2001-04-19 15:41:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DeskNC - CNC Pro 3x as fast as EMC???
ballendo@y...
2001-04-19 20:45:12 UTC
Re: DeskNC Windows version
mariss92705@y...
2001-04-19 21:14:59 UTC
Re: DeskNC Windows version
wanliker@a...
2001-04-19 23:26:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DeskNC Windows version
Matt Shaver
2001-04-20 00:02:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DeskNC Windows version
Tom Eldredge
2001-04-20 04:08:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DeskNC - CNC Pro 3x as fast as EMC???
kleinbauer@j...
2001-04-20 04:21:47 UTC
Re: DeskNC Windows version
Ray
2001-04-20 06:17:58 UTC
Re: DeskNC Windows version
Tom Eldredge
2001-04-20 07:41:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DeskNC - CNC Pro 3x as fast as EMC???
stratton@m...
2001-04-20 07:52:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DeskNC Windows version
wanliker@a...
2001-04-20 08:58:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DeskNC Windows version
kleinbauer@j...
2001-04-20 09:44:18 UTC
Re: DeskNC Windows version
wanliker@a...
2001-04-20 10:34:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DeskNC Windows version
wanliker@a...
2001-04-20 10:36:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DeskNC Windows version
kleinbauer@j...
2001-04-20 11:04:06 UTC
Re: DeskNC Windows version
wanliker@a...
2001-04-20 11:11:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DeskNC Windows version
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-04-20 12:18:38 UTC
Re: DeskNC - CNC Pro 3x as fast as EMC???
wanliker@a...
2001-04-20 12:35:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DeskNC - CNC Pro 3x as fast as EMC???
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2001-04-20 12:54:57 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DeskNC - CNC Pro 3x as fast as EMC???
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-04-20 15:54:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DeskNC Windows version
Larry Edington
2001-04-20 17:53:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DeskNC Windows version
ballendo@y...
2001-04-21 02:14:24 UTC
Re: DeskNC Windows version
kleinbauer@j...
2001-04-21 04:51:11 UTC
Re: DeskNC Windows version
wanliker@a...
2001-04-21 07:09:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DeskNC Windows version
Tom Eldredge
2001-04-22 08:58:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DeskNC Windows version
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-04-22 20:57:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DeskNC Windows version
Larry Edington
2001-04-22 23:15:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DeskNC Windows version
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2001-04-23 05:39:37 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DeskNC Windows version
Tom Eldredge
2001-04-24 06:23:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DeskNC Windows version