CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Vacuum Table

Posted by H & J Johnson
on 2007-02-15 08:19:31 UTC
Dave, What your saying is correct in the sense that the table must be able to carry the distributed weight [per sqr/ft] of the mat'l or it will deflect. This is correct. However if the table is designed to carry a 1000lb's and you load a 4 x 8 x 1" 6061 plate on it, the table will not deflect do to vacuum. Period. The table will deflect due to the weight of the material placed on it yes but it would deflect regardless whether there is a vacuum or not! Having a vacuum will distribute the pressure of the part more evenly and if you have a flimsy enough structure to not be able to support the weight of the part it will deflect. But just because you can pull 10psi of vacuum doesn't mean your table will have to support 46600lb's when you lock that 4x8 sheet of aluminum down to it!
You table must be able to support the weight in total and per sqr ft of the mat'l and thats it.

I've used a vacuum in making parts from a composite mold, the mold was fairly flimsy and would easily have deflected had there been any extra pressure, the part came out perfect w/ no twists or unplanned contours, therefore the mold did not deflect due to the vacuum placed on it.

Agreed?

Jarrett


----- Original Message -----
From: turbulatordude <dave_mucha@...>
Date: Thursday, February 15, 2007 9:16 am
Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Vacuum Table

> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, H & J Johnson <hjjohnson@...>
> wrote:
> >
> > No extra bracing will be required for a vacuum table [over a
> non-vacuum] as there is no 'atmoshereic pressure difference' between
> the two. As was mentioned the pressure is applied both to the top and
> bottom of the surface so no 'net change' occurs. The beauty of a
> vacuum is the immense pressure which can be obtained WITHOUT have to
> build the table extra heavy.
> >
> > FWIW
> > Jarrett
>
>
> yes and no.
>
> With a shop vac, about the best you can get is about 10 inches of
> WATER, or about 1/3 of a PSI. 1 psi = 27.72 inches of water.
> 1 atmosphere = 14.7 psi or 29.92 inches of mercury.
>
> with a tight seal, and a vac pump, theoretically you can get the
> pressure about 40 times stronger, or 14.7 PSI.
>
> If you are putting a sheet of plywood over your aluminum table, the
> ply will bend like a reed in the wind.
>
> however, if you are putting a 3/4" thick sheet of aluminum over your
> plywood table, your table will bend like a reed in the wind.
>
> considder the material, and the pressure and the supports. to hold
> paper or whatever the film is made of in a graphics shop, they only
> put in one tiny hole. the film would bend if the hole were too big.
>
> Just common sense.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com,
> wanliker@..., timg@...
> Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@...
> davemucha@... [Moderators]
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
> aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to
> reach it if you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to
> be a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members
> are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING
> THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> bill
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

Discussion Thread

William Scalione 2001-06-22 17:38:47 UTC Vacuum Table jesse 2001-06-22 17:58:21 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Vacuum Table Tim Goldstein 2001-06-22 18:35:14 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Vacuum Table Bob Campbell 2001-06-22 18:45:53 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Vacuum Table dougrasmussen@c... 2001-06-22 19:45:22 UTC Re: Vacuum Table Rich D. 2001-06-22 20:02:34 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Vacuum Table jesse 2001-06-23 09:59:17 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Vacuum Table William Scalione 2001-06-23 11:20:59 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Vacuum Table Jon Elson 2001-06-23 15:21:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Vacuum Table ballendo@y... 2001-06-23 16:45:53 UTC Re: Vacuum Table Doug Harrison 2001-06-23 17:36:53 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Vacuum Table jesse 2001-06-23 19:51:20 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Vacuum Table jesse 2001-06-23 19:51:42 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Vacuum Table Scott M. Thomas 2001-06-23 21:20:05 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Vacuum Table William Scalione 2001-06-23 21:23:54 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Vacuum Table Sven Peter, TAD S.A. 2001-06-23 21:34:54 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Vacuum Table Tim Goldstein 2001-06-23 21:41:00 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Vacuum Table Jon Elson 2001-06-23 22:57:43 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Vacuum Table jesse 2001-06-24 05:30:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Vacuum Table info.host@b... 2001-06-24 06:34:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Vacuum Table Sven Peter, TAD S.A. 2001-06-24 06:46:03 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Vacuum Table cadcamcenter@y... 2001-06-24 06:58:53 UTC Vacuum Table Sven Peter, TAD S.A. 2001-06-24 07:08:51 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Vacuum Table info.host@b... 2001-06-24 08:13:37 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Vacuum Table JanRwl@A... 2001-06-24 15:55:32 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Vacuum Table cadcamcenter@y... 2001-06-24 21:38:34 UTC Re: Vacuum Table Sven Peter, TAD S.A. 2001-06-24 22:21:07 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Vacuum Table Sven Peter, TAD S.A. 2001-06-24 22:24:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Vacuum Table cadcamcenter@y... 2001-06-25 02:41:45 UTC Re: Vacuum Table Sven Peter, TAD S.A. 2001-06-25 05:26:17 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Vacuum Table Kevin P. Martin 2001-06-25 08:16:21 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Vacuum Table Bob Campbell 2001-06-25 09:03:04 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Vacuum Table brian 2001-06-25 09:37:32 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Vacuum Table ballendo@y... 2001-06-26 04:07:23 UTC Re: Vacuum Table ballendo@y... 2001-06-26 04:21:01 UTC Re: Vacuum Table ballendo@y... 2001-06-26 04:44:19 UTC mdf for machines was Re: Vacuum Table ballendo@y... 2001-06-26 04:49:46 UTC Re: Vacuum Table Carol & Jerry Jankura 2001-06-26 04:51:01 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Vacuum Table ballendo@y... 2001-06-26 05:13:42 UTC Machine materials was Re: Vacuum Table ballendo@y... 2001-06-26 05:28:15 UTC Re: Vacuum Table Paul 2001-06-26 12:08:20 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Vacuum Table ballendo@y... 2001-06-26 17:51:10 UTC Re: Vacuum Table Sven Peter, TAD S.A. 2001-06-26 21:42:10 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machine materials was Re: Vacuum Table cncnovice 2007-02-12 06:42:26 UTC Vacuum Table turbulatordude 2007-02-12 17:30:18 UTC Re: Vacuum Table Sebastien Bailard 2007-02-14 23:26:23 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Vacuum Table JanRwl@A... 2007-02-14 23:37:04 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Vacuum Table H & J Johnson 2007-02-15 06:12:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Vacuum Table turbulatordude 2007-02-15 07:21:11 UTC Re: Vacuum Table Chris Brown 2007-02-15 07:45:48 UTC Re: Vacuum Table H & J Johnson 2007-02-15 08:19:31 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Vacuum Table David G. LeVine 2007-02-15 10:34:04 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Vacuum Table H & J Johnson 2007-02-15 11:49:43 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Vacuum Table roboticscnc 2007-02-16 03:45:02 UTC Re: Vacuum Table