RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
Posted by
Gail & Bryan Harries
on 2001-12-29 07:47:09 UTC
Bill,
is this what you where thinking of?
http://www.turnomat.com/bearing.html
Bryan
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Vance [mailto:ccq@...]
Sent: Saturday, 29 December, 2001 10:36 AM
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
Yo Ballendo;
Has anyone ever combined both slide and roller type systems? If 'twere done
right, it seems like it could improve things in a number of, "ways", like
improved movement/friction, adjustment, (just crank it a little tighter),
load
bearing, and etc. :-)
Bill
is this what you where thinking of?
http://www.turnomat.com/bearing.html
Bryan
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Vance [mailto:ccq@...]
Sent: Saturday, 29 December, 2001 10:36 AM
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
Yo Ballendo;
Has anyone ever combined both slide and roller type systems? If 'twere done
right, it seems like it could improve things in a number of, "ways", like
improved movement/friction, adjustment, (just crank it a little tighter),
load
bearing, and etc. :-)
Bill
On Sat Dec 29 01:47:51 2001, ballendo, <ballendo@...> wrote:
>Hello,
>
>We'll try to clear it up :-)
>
>Ways are a surface that something else slides upon. The term can
>refer to both the "slider" and the "slid-upon". Not all "ways" are
>in machine tools. For example, when old ships (and even new ships)
>were launched they slid down greased wooden "tracks" (planks, logs,
>etc.) which were called ways. The ship was said to be sliding down
>the ways into the water.
>
>The part of our tools corresponding to the "ship" is a way also. The
>two parts together are called "ways".
>
>In the ship description the "way" supports the ship that is sliding
>upon it. Often one of the two "ways"(sliding surfaces) of a given
>axis will be shorter than the other(just as the ship is shorter than
>its track). The short one may slide on the long one (as in the ship
>example), or the other way (pun intended).
>
>In machine tools we have two general types of way, the dovetail and
>box. Here is a link to the box style:
> http://www.mfg.mtu.edu/marc/primers/machtool/gif/mt3.gif
>
>Any decent picture of a Sherline mill or lathe will show you its
>dovetail ways. Also bridgeports, machinist vises, etc. Even better,
>at the Sherline website there is an instruction sheet which describes
>adjusting the gibs of these tools. The description there should lead
>you out of any remaining confusion.
>
>Now the fact is that the two parts of the dovetail ways and box ways
>both intermesh so it's sometimes hard to tell which is "in", and
>which is "out". We usually just say something slides "ON" the ways...
>
>A final thought to confuse things<G>: The term way was created before
>we had roller and linear bearings for our machine tools. So a modern
>tool may have parts referred to as ways, that DON'T SLIDE. They roll.
>And they might not be "boxlike" or "dovetail" at all. Since they
>function the same as the sliding type we still call them ways.
>
>The term "rails" is sometimes used (in place of "ways") for some
>types of modern linear bearings, and I've heard an old-timer or two
>refer to even the old-style sliding ways as rails.
>
>Hope we're a ways from where we started, :-)
>
>Ballendo
>
>P.S. To answer your exact question, I would say that the table slides
>on the saddle(x axis), and not even mention the ways... (The ways are
>a PART of the table and saddle.) The Table/saddle assy. then slides
>on the Machine Base(if a bedmill), or knee(for a knee mill) to make
>up the Y axis.
>
>> > Bill Vance wrote:
>> >
>> > Now I'm getting confused again, (don't worry it isn't hard to
>do). :-)
>> >
>> > So a table would slide _on_ ways, or _in_ ways? <snip>
>
>
>
>
>Addresses:
>FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
>FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
>
>Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
>Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
>Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
>URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>bill,
>List Manager
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
RKBA! ***** Blessings On Thee, Oh Israel! ***** 4-19!
----------------+----------+--------------------------+---------------------
An _EFFECTIVE_ | Insured | All matter is vibration. | Let he who hath no
weapon in every | by COLT; | -- Max Plank | weapon sell his
hand = Freedom | DIAL | In the beginning was the | garment and buy a
on every side! | 1911-A1. | word. -- The Bible | sword.--Jesus Christ
----------------+----------+--------------------------+---------------------
Constitutional Government is dead, LONG LIVE THE CONSTITUTION!!!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Addresses:
FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
bill,
List Manager
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Discussion Thread
jtfrimenko
2001-12-28 05:42:59 UTC
Motor vs. Servo
ballendo
2001-12-28 05:55:54 UTC
Re: Motor vs. Servo
Les Watts
2001-12-28 06:46:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motor vs. Servo
Ian Wright
2001-12-28 07:00:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motor vs. Servo
jtfrimenko
2001-12-28 07:37:47 UTC
Re: Motor vs. Servo
Bill Vance
2001-12-28 08:40:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motor vs. Servo
nielsenbe@a...
2001-12-28 09:34:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motor vs. Servo
Smoke
2001-12-28 10:24:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motor vs. Servo
Les Watts
2001-12-28 10:39:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motor vs. Servo
Jon Elson
2001-12-28 10:57:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motor vs. Servo
Jon Elson
2001-12-28 11:16:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motor vs. Servo
Jon Elson
2001-12-28 11:18:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motor vs. Servo
ballendo
2001-12-28 14:22:12 UTC
Re: Motor vs. Servo
Bill Vance
2001-12-28 20:47:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motor vs. Servo
Jon Elson
2001-12-28 23:00:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motor vs. Servo
ballendo
2001-12-29 01:47:55 UTC
machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
ka1bbg
2001-12-29 04:44:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motor vs. Servo
jtfrimenko
2001-12-29 06:43:21 UTC
Re: Motor vs. Servo
Bill Vance
2001-12-29 07:36:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
Gail & Bryan Harries
2001-12-29 07:47:09 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
Bill Vance
2001-12-29 09:15:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
Smoke
2001-12-29 12:53:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
Smoke
2001-12-29 12:55:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
netcom
2001-12-29 14:34:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
Smoke
2001-12-29 16:34:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
Sven Peter
2001-12-30 04:14:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
Bill Vance
2001-12-30 09:12:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
Smoke
2001-12-30 16:21:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
Sven Peter
2001-12-30 19:09:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
ballendo
2002-01-03 16:58:41 UTC
re: machine ways
ballendo
2002-01-03 17:32:06 UTC
OT machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
Ted Walls
2002-01-04 13:50:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re: machine ways
ballendo
2002-01-05 03:51:25 UTC
Re: machine ways
doug98105
2002-01-05 07:57:52 UTC
Re: machine ways
Ted Walls
2002-01-05 08:54:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine ways
Smoke
2002-01-05 11:14:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine ways
Bill Vance
2002-01-05 12:39:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine ways
Smoke
2002-01-05 15:04:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine ways
Bill Vance
2002-01-05 18:18:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine ways
Jon Elson
2002-01-05 22:29:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine ways
Jon Elson
2002-01-05 22:52:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine ways
ballendo
2002-01-05 23:34:14 UTC
Re: machine ways (moglice)
ballendo
2002-01-06 01:40:57 UTC
teflon coatings was Re: machine ways
Ted Walls
2002-01-06 06:33:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine ways
hllrsr@c...
2002-01-06 10:42:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine ways
Doug Harrison
2002-01-06 14:47:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine ways (moglice)
Sven Peter
2002-01-06 17:35:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine ways
Jon Elson
2002-01-06 18:11:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine ways (moglice)
JanRwl@A...
2002-01-07 11:15:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] teflon coatings was Re: machine ways
Jesse Brennan
2002-01-07 11:39:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] teflon coatings was Re: machine ways