Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine ways
Posted by
Bill Vance
on 2002-01-05 12:39:20 UTC
Bearing in mind that hardness/temper can be an issue. After Heat treating, most
steel parts up to a foot or two long can be minimally tempered by placing them
in an oven set at 3-4 hundred degrees for an hour or two. Minimally means that
the hardness will mostly remain while the brittleness is drawn down. Not quite
a true spring temper, but closer than full hard. Good for blades and most other
sharp stuff, in that it will retain an edge fairly well. Your mileage may vary
on machine tooling, however, as I haven't done anything like that. For
differential heat treating, you probably wouldn't want to do it at all, as it
might weaken the spring temper section, and soften the full hard section of
whatever you're working on.
Bill
steel parts up to a foot or two long can be minimally tempered by placing them
in an oven set at 3-4 hundred degrees for an hour or two. Minimally means that
the hardness will mostly remain while the brittleness is drawn down. Not quite
a true spring temper, but closer than full hard. Good for blades and most other
sharp stuff, in that it will retain an edge fairly well. Your mileage may vary
on machine tooling, however, as I haven't done anything like that. For
differential heat treating, you probably wouldn't want to do it at all, as it
might weaken the spring temper section, and soften the full hard section of
whatever you're working on.
Bill
On Sat Jan 5 11:13:36 2002, Smoke, <smoke@...> wrote:
>Speaking of plastics for use on ways:
>
>I was reading the other day how PTFE is put on ubiquitous pots and pans
>since it sticks to almost nothing. It is sprayed on and then baked.
>
>This lead me to wonder 'suppose (during manufacture of course) one were get
>a can of spray on PTFE and apply it to the sliding parts and bake them in
>an oven'. That, combined with normal lubing should make for some pretty low
>friction coefficients. An extra boon would be no extra machine work would
>be required.
>
>Sounds like a good experiment to try (with some small parts of course).
>
>Smoke
>
>> ubiquitous(means everywhere!).
>>
>> 2)PTFE- (PolyTetraFluoroEthylene) also called teflon, VERY soft, when
>> used for linear bearings it is backed up with a harder material and
>> used in very thin layers. The slippery-est (lowest friction co-
>> efficient) stuff we have so far in commercial quantities.
>
>> Ballendo
>
>
>Addresses:
>FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
>FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
>
>Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
>Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
>Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
>URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>bill,
>List Manager
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
RKBA! ***** Blessings On Thee, Oh Israel! ***** 4-19!
----------------+----------+--------------------------+---------------------
An _EFFECTIVE_ | Insured | All matter is vibration. | Let he who hath no
weapon in every | by COLT; | -- Max Plank | weapon sell his
hand = Freedom | DIAL | In the beginning was the | garment and buy a
on every side! | 1911-A1. | word. -- The Bible | sword.--Jesus Christ
----------------+----------+--------------------------+---------------------
Constitutional Government is dead, LONG LIVE THE CONSTITUTION!!!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discussion Thread
jtfrimenko
2001-12-28 05:42:59 UTC
Motor vs. Servo
ballendo
2001-12-28 05:55:54 UTC
Re: Motor vs. Servo
Les Watts
2001-12-28 06:46:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motor vs. Servo
Ian Wright
2001-12-28 07:00:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motor vs. Servo
jtfrimenko
2001-12-28 07:37:47 UTC
Re: Motor vs. Servo
Bill Vance
2001-12-28 08:40:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motor vs. Servo
nielsenbe@a...
2001-12-28 09:34:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motor vs. Servo
Smoke
2001-12-28 10:24:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motor vs. Servo
Les Watts
2001-12-28 10:39:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motor vs. Servo
Jon Elson
2001-12-28 10:57:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motor vs. Servo
Jon Elson
2001-12-28 11:16:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motor vs. Servo
Jon Elson
2001-12-28 11:18:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motor vs. Servo
ballendo
2001-12-28 14:22:12 UTC
Re: Motor vs. Servo
Bill Vance
2001-12-28 20:47:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motor vs. Servo
Jon Elson
2001-12-28 23:00:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motor vs. Servo
ballendo
2001-12-29 01:47:55 UTC
machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
ka1bbg
2001-12-29 04:44:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motor vs. Servo
jtfrimenko
2001-12-29 06:43:21 UTC
Re: Motor vs. Servo
Bill Vance
2001-12-29 07:36:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
Gail & Bryan Harries
2001-12-29 07:47:09 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
Bill Vance
2001-12-29 09:15:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
Smoke
2001-12-29 12:53:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
Smoke
2001-12-29 12:55:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
netcom
2001-12-29 14:34:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
Smoke
2001-12-29 16:34:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
Sven Peter
2001-12-30 04:14:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
Bill Vance
2001-12-30 09:12:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
Smoke
2001-12-30 16:21:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
Sven Peter
2001-12-30 19:09:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
ballendo
2002-01-03 16:58:41 UTC
re: machine ways
ballendo
2002-01-03 17:32:06 UTC
OT machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
Ted Walls
2002-01-04 13:50:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re: machine ways
ballendo
2002-01-05 03:51:25 UTC
Re: machine ways
doug98105
2002-01-05 07:57:52 UTC
Re: machine ways
Ted Walls
2002-01-05 08:54:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine ways
Smoke
2002-01-05 11:14:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine ways
Bill Vance
2002-01-05 12:39:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine ways
Smoke
2002-01-05 15:04:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine ways
Bill Vance
2002-01-05 18:18:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine ways
Jon Elson
2002-01-05 22:29:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine ways
Jon Elson
2002-01-05 22:52:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine ways
ballendo
2002-01-05 23:34:14 UTC
Re: machine ways (moglice)
ballendo
2002-01-06 01:40:57 UTC
teflon coatings was Re: machine ways
Ted Walls
2002-01-06 06:33:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine ways
hllrsr@c...
2002-01-06 10:42:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine ways
Doug Harrison
2002-01-06 14:47:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine ways (moglice)
Sven Peter
2002-01-06 17:35:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine ways
Jon Elson
2002-01-06 18:11:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine ways (moglice)
JanRwl@A...
2002-01-07 11:15:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] teflon coatings was Re: machine ways
Jesse Brennan
2002-01-07 11:39:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] teflon coatings was Re: machine ways