Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] teflon coatings was Re: machine ways
Posted by
Jesse Brennan
on 2002-01-07 11:39:02 UTC
There is a spray can and oven technique on the market but it does not work too
well. We used it as a quick fix anti gall on 316ss to 316ss - it works but
comes off easily.
Later we used a shop applied version both for anti gall and corrosion protection
for moist HCl in 316L. This will pinhole while you watch unprotected
.Particles still come off but it works. The manufacturers of the material
license the applicator for a fee and will only sell to license holders. This
keeps sloppy work and bad results off the market so don't complain about it. A
few years ago someone was repackaging material and selling it but they got
stopped. We used a lot of different filled polymers usually TFPE for compressor
rings and seals and cryogenic pumps non lubricated. Work fine when you get the
right stuff. Sucess requires expreience. There are a lot of srewups out there.
The polymers cold flow which is one reason for the filler. Cold flow and tramp
pickup will make the material unsuitable for machine tools as a bearing
material
The future will involve ceramic materials. Some of these are here in some use
now, But they will not be home workable or cheap.
Jesse
JanRwl@... wrote:
well. We used it as a quick fix anti gall on 316ss to 316ss - it works but
comes off easily.
Later we used a shop applied version both for anti gall and corrosion protection
for moist HCl in 316L. This will pinhole while you watch unprotected
.Particles still come off but it works. The manufacturers of the material
license the applicator for a fee and will only sell to license holders. This
keeps sloppy work and bad results off the market so don't complain about it. A
few years ago someone was repackaging material and selling it but they got
stopped. We used a lot of different filled polymers usually TFPE for compressor
rings and seals and cryogenic pumps non lubricated. Work fine when you get the
right stuff. Sucess requires expreience. There are a lot of srewups out there.
The polymers cold flow which is one reason for the filler. Cold flow and tramp
pickup will make the material unsuitable for machine tools as a bearing
material
The future will involve ceramic materials. Some of these are here in some use
now, But they will not be home workable or cheap.
Jesse
JanRwl@... wrote:
> In a message dated 06-Jan-02 03:41:39 Central Standard Time,
> ballendo@... writes:
>
> > I suspect the baking on entails more than a spray can and home oven...
> > But it can't hurt to try, right?
>
> I am no chemist, but I can tell you, it DEFINITELY does! it involves some
> NASTY tricks with nascent sodium particles, high-tech vessels and
> temperatures and all that "chemical engineering stuff", so the PTFE is
> "electroplated" onto the metal of the screw. It is certainly NOT "spray-can
> and oven"!
>
> "Can't hurt to try"??? If you aren't at least a BS is ChE not suffering from
> rectal-cranial inversion, you best not fiddle with this! You can at least
> asphixiate yourself, fume your dwelling with halide vapors, gas your
> sleeping family-members, and ruin a perfectly good manicure in the process!
> JRR
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
>
> Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
> URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> bill,
> List Manager
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Discussion Thread
jtfrimenko
2001-12-28 05:42:59 UTC
Motor vs. Servo
ballendo
2001-12-28 05:55:54 UTC
Re: Motor vs. Servo
Les Watts
2001-12-28 06:46:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motor vs. Servo
Ian Wright
2001-12-28 07:00:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motor vs. Servo
jtfrimenko
2001-12-28 07:37:47 UTC
Re: Motor vs. Servo
Bill Vance
2001-12-28 08:40:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motor vs. Servo
nielsenbe@a...
2001-12-28 09:34:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motor vs. Servo
Smoke
2001-12-28 10:24:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motor vs. Servo
Les Watts
2001-12-28 10:39:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motor vs. Servo
Jon Elson
2001-12-28 10:57:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motor vs. Servo
Jon Elson
2001-12-28 11:16:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motor vs. Servo
Jon Elson
2001-12-28 11:18:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motor vs. Servo
ballendo
2001-12-28 14:22:12 UTC
Re: Motor vs. Servo
Bill Vance
2001-12-28 20:47:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motor vs. Servo
Jon Elson
2001-12-28 23:00:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motor vs. Servo
ballendo
2001-12-29 01:47:55 UTC
machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
ka1bbg
2001-12-29 04:44:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motor vs. Servo
jtfrimenko
2001-12-29 06:43:21 UTC
Re: Motor vs. Servo
Bill Vance
2001-12-29 07:36:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
Gail & Bryan Harries
2001-12-29 07:47:09 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
Bill Vance
2001-12-29 09:15:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
Smoke
2001-12-29 12:53:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
Smoke
2001-12-29 12:55:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
netcom
2001-12-29 14:34:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
Smoke
2001-12-29 16:34:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
Sven Peter
2001-12-30 04:14:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
Bill Vance
2001-12-30 09:12:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
Smoke
2001-12-30 16:21:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
Sven Peter
2001-12-30 19:09:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
ballendo
2002-01-03 16:58:41 UTC
re: machine ways
ballendo
2002-01-03 17:32:06 UTC
OT machine ways was Re: Motor vs. Servo
Ted Walls
2002-01-04 13:50:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re: machine ways
ballendo
2002-01-05 03:51:25 UTC
Re: machine ways
doug98105
2002-01-05 07:57:52 UTC
Re: machine ways
Ted Walls
2002-01-05 08:54:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine ways
Smoke
2002-01-05 11:14:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine ways
Bill Vance
2002-01-05 12:39:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine ways
Smoke
2002-01-05 15:04:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine ways
Bill Vance
2002-01-05 18:18:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine ways
Jon Elson
2002-01-05 22:29:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine ways
Jon Elson
2002-01-05 22:52:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine ways
ballendo
2002-01-05 23:34:14 UTC
Re: machine ways (moglice)
ballendo
2002-01-06 01:40:57 UTC
teflon coatings was Re: machine ways
Ted Walls
2002-01-06 06:33:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine ways
hllrsr@c...
2002-01-06 10:42:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine ways
Doug Harrison
2002-01-06 14:47:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine ways (moglice)
Sven Peter
2002-01-06 17:35:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine ways
Jon Elson
2002-01-06 18:11:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine ways (moglice)
JanRwl@A...
2002-01-07 11:15:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] teflon coatings was Re: machine ways
Jesse Brennan
2002-01-07 11:39:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] teflon coatings was Re: machine ways