Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Posted by
Mike Payson
on 2011-10-10 11:34:26 UTC
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Alan <KM6VV@...> wrote:
don't use them. CAD files are available for everything, however. Most
of the RepRap world uses OpenSCAD which is a free, Opensource CAD
program that should be able to export DXF's.
DRAMATICALLY in the last 6 months. 6 months ago, even the best reprap
could only produce really high quality prints with a fair amount of
luck. The software has improved so much since then that once you have
your machine properly calibrated and tuned, you can produce good
poarts quite consistently. Things still go wrong, but it is nothing
like it used to be. I would say that most people are still not getting
quite as good as a Stratasys, but some people are getting far better,
including printing .05mm layers compared to the .2mm layers the
Stratasys uses. The trade off is speed, most people don't have the
patience for that sort of print, so most people don't really push the
quality limits.
There are dozens of electronics variants (two of which I linked to
earlier and had prominent source file links), dozens of firmwares,
many printer designs, etc. ALL have source available, though in a few
cases the source locations are not as well linked as they should be.
But the GPL does not say you need to make the source easy to find,
only that you have to provide it, and it is all available.
> I too found that the mechanical drawings were woefully inadequate, andMechanical drawing may be scarce, but when you have a 3d printer you
> schematics to be missing.
don't use them. CAD files are available for everything, however. Most
of the RepRap world uses OpenSCAD which is a free, Opensource CAD
program that should be able to export DXF's.
> I was interested in machining up an extruder to be used on a CNC platformThis does not surprise me at all. The quality has improved
> (either my Sherline mill, or a PCB router I built).
>
> The RepRat parts I've seen hardly compare to those I've worked with made on
> a Dimension.
DRAMATICALLY in the last 6 months. 6 months ago, even the best reprap
could only produce really high quality prints with a fair amount of
luck. The software has improved so much since then that once you have
your machine properly calibrated and tuned, you can produce good
poarts quite consistently. Things still go wrong, but it is nothing
like it used to be. I would say that most people are still not getting
quite as good as a Stratasys, but some people are getting far better,
including printing .05mm layers compared to the .2mm layers the
Stratasys uses. The trade off is speed, most people don't have the
patience for that sort of print, so most people don't really push the
quality limits.
> I'm familiar with the Arduino, and would consider using it for an extruder.To what? Ask a specific question and I will happily attempt help you.
> Comments I've read are that only a very few (one?) EMC-ported RepRat is
> being run. Apparently there are several additional G-Codes that must be
> added to accommodate the extruder, and possibly other things (?) to run on
> CNC. I don't have all the information, and I'm in no way ready to start
> adding the necessary G-Codes to my own CNC controller program (Step4); but
> it's a thought. I'd like to understand the algorithm controlling the
> extrusion process first.
>
> Show me the source code!
There are dozens of electronics variants (two of which I linked to
earlier and had prominent source file links), dozens of firmwares,
many printer designs, etc. ALL have source available, though in a few
cases the source locations are not as well linked as they should be.
But the GPL does not say you need to make the source easy to find,
only that you have to provide it, and it is all available.
>
> Alan KM6VV
>
>> [mailto:CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Phil@Yahoo
>>
>> Thanks, but those URLs serve only to illustrate my point. For example, the
>> "schematic" on the extruder page is actually a picture of a schematic (a
>> .png file) which shows only the pinouts of the major components of the
>> board. It does not show how they are interconnected, nor is it complete.
> In
>> short it is useless, a pretense. Same thing for "source code." You can
> find
>> things like test programs to drive the extruder at a constant rate or to
>> read the thermocouple, but nothing non-trivial. By far the most space is
>> devoted to instructions on assembling the PCB. This "open source" project
> is
>> nothing more than a thinly disguised marketing program. Nothing wrong with
>> selling, but to do so under false premises is, in my opinion, despicable.
>> Technical aptitude or not, a liar is still a liar. (NOTE: I'm not calling
>> YOU a liar. I don't know who is behind the false claims. It's a matter of
>> principle. It's unethical.) These web pages look at first glance like a
>> trove of valuable information, but they are really little more than a
> sales
>> pitch. I'll withdraw my assertion when somebody shows me something
>> substantial that is useful without first buying something from the
>> promoters.
>>
>> --Phil M.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@..., timg@...
> Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... davemucha@... [Moderators]
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto: aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> bill
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
Discussion Thread
Ron Thompson
2011-10-06 16:51:50 UTC
Maybe OT, reprap build started
Phil@Y...
2011-10-07 09:31:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Ron Thompson
2011-10-07 09:45:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Dan Mauch
2011-10-07 10:23:33 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Ron Thompson
2011-10-07 11:04:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Danny Miller
2011-10-07 12:31:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Kevin Martin
2011-10-07 12:39:20 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Phil@Y...
2011-10-07 17:07:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
wolfgang
2011-10-07 17:55:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Mike Payson
2011-10-07 18:09:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Johnny
2011-10-08 03:49:29 UTC
Re: Maybe OT, reprap build started
Ron Thompson
2011-10-08 08:53:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Maybe OT, reprap build started
Ron Thompson
2011-10-08 08:58:26 UTC
OT New Hackerspace announcement
Mike Payson
2011-10-08 16:37:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Maybe OT, reprap build started
556RECON
2011-10-09 05:42:10 UTC
REPRAP COST EFFECTIVE?
turbulatordude
2011-10-09 08:15:29 UTC
Re: REPRAP COST EFFECTIVE?
Michael Fagan
2011-10-09 08:18:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] REPRAP COST EFFECTIVE?
Ron Thompson
2011-10-09 08:22:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] REPRAP COST EFFECTIVE?
Kevin Martin
2011-10-09 08:24:50 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Jon Elson
2011-10-09 10:16:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] REPRAP COST EFFECTIVE?
Danny Miller
2011-10-09 10:49:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] REPRAP COST EFFECTIVE?
Mike Payson
2011-10-09 12:40:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] REPRAP COST EFFECTIVE?
Ron Thompson
2011-10-09 13:08:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] REPRAP COST EFFECTIVE?
Mike Payson
2011-10-09 13:09:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] REPRAP COST EFFECTIVE?
Mike Payson
2011-10-09 13:13:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] REPRAP COST EFFECTIVE?
Mike Payson
2011-10-09 13:55:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
556RECON
2011-10-09 14:17:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] REPRAP COST EFFECTIVE?
Mike Rehmus
2011-10-09 14:55:34 UTC
Re: Maybe OT, reprap build started
Kevin Martin
2011-10-09 15:46:14 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Maybe OT, reprap build started
Jon Elson
2011-10-09 17:26:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] REPRAP COST EFFECTIVE?
Jon Elson
2011-10-09 17:43:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] REPRAP COST EFFECTIVE?
Mike Payson
2011-10-09 18:38:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] REPRAP COST EFFECTIVE?
Low Compression
2011-10-09 19:50:13 UTC
Re: Maybe OT, reprap build started
Danny Miller
2011-10-09 20:55:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Maybe OT, reprap build started
Mike Payson
2011-10-09 20:59:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Maybe OT, reprap build started
Phil@Y...
2011-10-09 21:42:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Mike Payson
2011-10-09 21:56:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Phil@Y...
2011-10-09 22:13:10 UTC
Re: Maybe OT, reprap build started
Danny Miller
2011-10-09 22:34:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Maybe OT, reprap build started
Phil@Y...
2011-10-09 23:11:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Mike Payson
2011-10-09 23:16:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Maybe OT, reprap build started
Mike Payson
2011-10-09 23:46:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Danny Miller
2011-10-10 01:02:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Kevin Martin
2011-10-10 07:23:47 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Kevin Martin
2011-10-10 07:24:21 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Kevin Martin
2011-10-10 07:31:56 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Phil@Y...
2011-10-10 10:28:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Phil@Y...
2011-10-10 10:31:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Alan
2011-10-10 10:35:37 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Mike Payson
2011-10-10 11:21:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Mike Payson
2011-10-10 11:34:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Alan
2011-10-10 12:08:57 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Phil@Y...
2011-10-10 12:09:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Danny Miller
2011-10-10 12:52:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Phil@Y...
2011-10-10 15:03:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Mike Payson
2011-10-10 17:47:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Jon Elson
2011-10-10 19:28:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Phil@Y...
2011-10-10 22:01:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Mike Payson
2011-10-10 22:19:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
David G. LeVine
2011-10-11 10:32:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Danny Miller
2011-10-11 10:37:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
xoethosox
2011-10-11 14:39:15 UTC
Re: Maybe OT, reprap build started
Tom
2011-10-11 15:17:40 UTC
Re: Maybe OT, reprap build started [moderator is not asleep}
Mike Payson
2011-10-11 19:07:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Maybe OT, reprap build started
Danny Miller
2011-10-12 00:20:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Maybe OT, reprap build started
Phil@Y...
2011-10-12 16:25:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Phil@Y...
2011-10-13 08:18:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Les Newell
2011-10-13 08:47:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Lester Caine
2011-10-13 09:03:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Jon Elson
2011-10-13 09:52:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Dave Halliday
2011-10-13 16:06:11 UTC
OT - open source licencing
imserv1
2011-10-14 06:47:32 UTC
Re: OT - open source licencing
"hanermo" - CNC 6-axis Designs
2011-10-14 07:02:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: OT - open source licencing
David G. LeVine
2011-10-16 12:10:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Danny Miller
2011-10-16 12:30:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
robin
2011-10-16 17:17:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: OT - open source licencing