Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Posted by
Mike Payson
on 2011-10-10 22:19:49 UTC
Lol, sorry, you are right, my consistent offers to help you in spite of your
overt hostility and accusations were obviously uncalled for. Please forgive
me, I will be certain to not try to help you in the future. Good luck
getting your printer working. ;-)
overt hostility and accusations were obviously uncalled for. Please forgive
me, I will be certain to not try to help you in the future. Good luck
getting your printer working. ;-)
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Phil@Yahoo <yahoo@...> wrote:
> I think these repeated personal attacks speak volumes. Obviously the truth
> hurts. Must have hit a nerve. Etc. Considering the source, I'll stop
> banging
> on the bars of the cage now before you fling any more dung. I'm surprised
> you've been allowed to continue this long. The moderator must be asleep at
> the wheel. In any event I won't be opening any more posts from you, so if
> you feel compelled to convince yourself that you had the last word, feel
> free to spew whatever further invective continues to eat at you. No doubt
> some find it entertaining. Show's over folks, he'll calm down shortly.
>
> --Phil M.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Payson" <mike@...>
> To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 5:46 PM
> Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
>
>
> > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Phil@Yahoo <yahoo@...>
> > wrote:
> >> Chill. Try the decaf.
> >>
> >> I stand by every word.
> >
> > LOL "Nothing I say is correct, but I stand by every word". And you
> > accuse the RepRap community of using the tactics of politicians? ;-)
> >
> >> The fact that the guys selling stuff don't call
> >> themselves "RepRap" doesn't change a thing. Somebody is claiming a
> motive
> >> I
> >> do not believe. To assert that I chose not to build one of these
> machines
> >> at
> >> this time because I can't understand them is just plain stupid. You know
> >> nothing of my abilities. To pass one's self off as a great humanitarian
> >> while obfuscating the facts is a favorite tactic of politicians and, now
> >> apparently, some engineers too.
> >
> > No one would argue that the RepRap documentation doesn't suck. It
> > does. In fact in many areas it sucks badly. But it is quite a big jump
> > from "the documentation sucks" to "there is a global conspiracy to
> > make sure that Phil M. does not get a RepRap without buying one".
> >
> > It seems to me that you made a big fallacy in the reasoning that lead
> > you to your conclusion. You seem to assume that because YOU cannot
> > understand the documentation, NO ONE can understand it. I am sure you
> > are correct and that you have many varied skills, but unless you are
> > claiming that you are a super-genius of some sort, it seems reasonable
> > that there are things in the world that you do not understand yet are
> > quite understandable to others. I am sure even Albert Einstein had to
> > ask for help now and then. Judging from the many thousands of RepRaps
> > in the world today, a significant percentage of which were
> > self-sourced (my own included), it is clear that it is possible to
> > build a reprap, and it is even possible to do so without spending a
> > dime at one of the normal RepRap suppliers (though you are asking for
> > trouble if you do not at least source your hot end from one of the
> > known suppliers).
> >
> > The simple reality is that the reprap is a RAPIDLY changing open
> > source project. Few open source projects have good documentation to
> > begin with, and almost no open source projects change even half as
> > quickly as the stuff in the reprap world does. I follow it VERY
> > closely, and even I don't know half of what is going on at any given
> > time. It is almost impossible to keep the documentation current, let
> > alone keeping it organized.
> >
> >> One has to wonder where your interests are vested. Methinks thou doth
> >> protest too much.
> >
> > Lol again. You are a very funny man. Too bad you are not trying to be.
> > You need to stop, take a deep breath, and realize that the world is
> > not conspiring against you. I have no "interests" here except the
> > interest in a fun, useful hobby and, if possible, helping others to
> > get started in the hobby.
> >
> > As I have said, I make no money from the reprap, in spite of being a
> > significant contributor to two of the available electronics designs
> > (including one of the two most popular), a minor contributor to the
> > other popular design, and the lead architect of what I hope to be the
> > next generation electronics system (I don't make a dime from any of
> > those). I am also about to release what I fully expect to be the new
> > standard RepRap design, and while I will probably sell a few part sets
> > on eBay to recoup some the costs of the development, I do not expect
> > to make any significant amount of money from this design, either. I do
> > not receive any monetary compensation from any of the suppliers for
> > giving advice. I have gotten samples from a couple suppliers, but I
> > assure you those do not effect who I recommend in any way. I do all
> > this because I enjoy it, there is no other "interest" involved.
> >
> > If you are willing to put aside your conspiracy theories, I am HAPPY
> > to help you understand what you need. For example it seems like one
> > question you should have asked, but didn't was "If you do not
> > recommend EMC or Mach3, and I don't want to buy pre-made electronics,
> > are there other options available to me?" If you had asked that
> > question (or something similar) I would have pointed you to the Gen7
> > design, which is completely DIY, designed for home etching or cnc
> > routing. I would provide you a link, but the reprap wiki is down right
> > now (Though it is possible that is just people conspiring to keep you
> > from finding this valuable piece of information). But if you go to the
> > reprap Wiki later and search for "Gen 7" or possibly "Gen7" I am sure
> > you can find it.
> >
> > If you have other questions, feel free to ask. If you just want to
> > rant some more about how evil we all are, feel free to do that also,
> > just do it somewhere else.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Addresses:
> > FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> > FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> > Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...,
> > timg@...
> > Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... davemucha@...
> > [Moderators]
> > URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> >
> > OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> > If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
> > aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it
> > if you have trouble.
> > http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a
> > sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for
> > OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
> >
> > NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM.
> > DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> > bill
> > List Mom
> > List Owner
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...,
> timg@...
> Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... davemucha@... [Moderators]
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
> aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if
> you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a
> sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT
> subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM.
> DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> bill
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
Ron Thompson
2011-10-06 16:51:50 UTC
Maybe OT, reprap build started
Phil@Y...
2011-10-07 09:31:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Ron Thompson
2011-10-07 09:45:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Dan Mauch
2011-10-07 10:23:33 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Ron Thompson
2011-10-07 11:04:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Danny Miller
2011-10-07 12:31:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Kevin Martin
2011-10-07 12:39:20 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Phil@Y...
2011-10-07 17:07:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
wolfgang
2011-10-07 17:55:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Mike Payson
2011-10-07 18:09:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Johnny
2011-10-08 03:49:29 UTC
Re: Maybe OT, reprap build started
Ron Thompson
2011-10-08 08:53:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Maybe OT, reprap build started
Ron Thompson
2011-10-08 08:58:26 UTC
OT New Hackerspace announcement
Mike Payson
2011-10-08 16:37:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Maybe OT, reprap build started
556RECON
2011-10-09 05:42:10 UTC
REPRAP COST EFFECTIVE?
turbulatordude
2011-10-09 08:15:29 UTC
Re: REPRAP COST EFFECTIVE?
Michael Fagan
2011-10-09 08:18:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] REPRAP COST EFFECTIVE?
Ron Thompson
2011-10-09 08:22:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] REPRAP COST EFFECTIVE?
Kevin Martin
2011-10-09 08:24:50 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Jon Elson
2011-10-09 10:16:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] REPRAP COST EFFECTIVE?
Danny Miller
2011-10-09 10:49:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] REPRAP COST EFFECTIVE?
Mike Payson
2011-10-09 12:40:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] REPRAP COST EFFECTIVE?
Ron Thompson
2011-10-09 13:08:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] REPRAP COST EFFECTIVE?
Mike Payson
2011-10-09 13:09:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] REPRAP COST EFFECTIVE?
Mike Payson
2011-10-09 13:13:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] REPRAP COST EFFECTIVE?
Mike Payson
2011-10-09 13:55:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
556RECON
2011-10-09 14:17:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] REPRAP COST EFFECTIVE?
Mike Rehmus
2011-10-09 14:55:34 UTC
Re: Maybe OT, reprap build started
Kevin Martin
2011-10-09 15:46:14 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Maybe OT, reprap build started
Jon Elson
2011-10-09 17:26:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] REPRAP COST EFFECTIVE?
Jon Elson
2011-10-09 17:43:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] REPRAP COST EFFECTIVE?
Mike Payson
2011-10-09 18:38:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] REPRAP COST EFFECTIVE?
Low Compression
2011-10-09 19:50:13 UTC
Re: Maybe OT, reprap build started
Danny Miller
2011-10-09 20:55:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Maybe OT, reprap build started
Mike Payson
2011-10-09 20:59:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Maybe OT, reprap build started
Phil@Y...
2011-10-09 21:42:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Mike Payson
2011-10-09 21:56:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Phil@Y...
2011-10-09 22:13:10 UTC
Re: Maybe OT, reprap build started
Danny Miller
2011-10-09 22:34:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Maybe OT, reprap build started
Phil@Y...
2011-10-09 23:11:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Mike Payson
2011-10-09 23:16:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Maybe OT, reprap build started
Mike Payson
2011-10-09 23:46:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Danny Miller
2011-10-10 01:02:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Kevin Martin
2011-10-10 07:23:47 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Kevin Martin
2011-10-10 07:24:21 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Kevin Martin
2011-10-10 07:31:56 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Phil@Y...
2011-10-10 10:28:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Phil@Y...
2011-10-10 10:31:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Alan
2011-10-10 10:35:37 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Mike Payson
2011-10-10 11:21:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Mike Payson
2011-10-10 11:34:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Alan
2011-10-10 12:08:57 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Phil@Y...
2011-10-10 12:09:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Danny Miller
2011-10-10 12:52:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Phil@Y...
2011-10-10 15:03:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Mike Payson
2011-10-10 17:47:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Jon Elson
2011-10-10 19:28:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Phil@Y...
2011-10-10 22:01:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Mike Payson
2011-10-10 22:19:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
David G. LeVine
2011-10-11 10:32:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Danny Miller
2011-10-11 10:37:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
xoethosox
2011-10-11 14:39:15 UTC
Re: Maybe OT, reprap build started
Tom
2011-10-11 15:17:40 UTC
Re: Maybe OT, reprap build started [moderator is not asleep}
Mike Payson
2011-10-11 19:07:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Maybe OT, reprap build started
Danny Miller
2011-10-12 00:20:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Maybe OT, reprap build started
Phil@Y...
2011-10-12 16:25:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Phil@Y...
2011-10-13 08:18:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Les Newell
2011-10-13 08:47:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Lester Caine
2011-10-13 09:03:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Jon Elson
2011-10-13 09:52:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Dave Halliday
2011-10-13 16:06:11 UTC
OT - open source licencing
imserv1
2011-10-14 06:47:32 UTC
Re: OT - open source licencing
"hanermo" - CNC 6-axis Designs
2011-10-14 07:02:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: OT - open source licencing
David G. LeVine
2011-10-16 12:10:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
Danny Miller
2011-10-16 12:30:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Maybe OT, reprap build started
robin
2011-10-16 17:17:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: OT - open source licencing